Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,455
Except... both of those responses were about the Graham feat. So opening a new thread isn't going to mean anything if you do not pick a side on whether or not him rewriting events is a valid argument.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Plot Manipulation Re-Introduction for the Maoh verse
- Thread starter EldemadeDityjon
- Start date
- Status
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 17,026
- 12,713
- Thread starter
- #162
Him Rewriting a event is valid argument but you are misunderstanding it into destroying something or changing past both are completely wrong. So i would prefer to redo the thread with better explanation. Anyway do you know which thread i should ask to close this CRT?
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,455
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 17,026
- 12,713
- Thread starter
- #164
Okay thank
AnotherWay22
She/Her- 23
- 7
It's not a Fate Manipulation.
You don't need to comment. This topic has been rejected. And we are waiting for someone to close the thread.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 17,026
- 12,713
- Thread starter
- #167
Whatever you think stop derailing the topic is closed.
You are acting like other verses don't do that? Also funny how you are acting like different people wouldn't have different POV. ?
- 18,393
- 14,323
I guess this is his point, some other verses have plot manipulation because they have “books” that contains or is equivalent to reality, and they simply manipulate it and got “plot manipulation”. This is his literally point, why those get the plot manipulation and Garham does not. And don't confuse Eques, we are talking about Garham, so you basically did not read the OP once again.
You did not even read my comments because I obviously disagreed and disallowed anyone to use Eques statement.
- 1,802
- 5,311
- 18,393
- 14,323
@EldemadeDityjon the thread can be closed and create a separate thread since many people (and they are going to mention Eques) to ignore most of the thread. Also, we need to prepare downgrading some plot manipulation characters for having nigh-same similarity to Garham one.
As it is only text manipulation
As it is only text manipulation
Pekarchan
He/Him- 55
- 17
So, whats a conclusion for this thread, i abstained from voting cuz its so ambiguous crt for me
- 3,702
- 2,066
Bruh......
- 18,393
- 14,323
Just give it up. It is not plot manipulation.
- 3,702
- 2,066
Every feats is coresponding one after one. Flowery language but author still write the same
- 3,702
- 2,066
Yeah i dont agree with this. But if you guys like to get plot or text manip in different way (graham) i think i will argue for that now
- 18,393
- 14,323
Which we are doing in the next separate CRT but Eques/Dilfred statement just don't qualify. They are not even plot hax to begin with and I actually explained it deeply.
- 3,702
- 2,066
Bruh i will drop that for now, because i dont want make this 8 page
- 168,537
- 77,323
I was asked to close this thread:
Should I do so?
Should I do so?
- 5,645
- 3,677
Op said he will make a new thread focusing on the other argument since this thread already created so much misunderstanding. So best to close
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
