- 5
- 0
Seems good to me tiktok scalers will be so happy about this hhh
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Maou Gakuin: Anos and Cosmology Additions
- Thread starter Tatsumi504
- Start date
- Status
- 219
- 130
They're the ones who remain the problem.
- 4,647
- 3,251
I'm not saying it's not AP, but a lot of Anos's Durability stuff is blank, so it would be cool if it was used for both or something, idk.
- 219
- 130
I actually agree for this, I never knew why this wasn't put down as any sort of durability for him either. It works for both.
- 11,121
- 19,375
Oh yeah, this actually a good idea, because he seems to lack a good durability feat (and feats in general for durability).
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 15,435
- 11,260
- 219
- 130
I always wondered why in the past it wasn't a durability feat as much it was AP, considering he wasn't instantly evaporated. Not only that, he brought the flames INTO HIMSELF. So not only does it work for external, but internal like with how Jio Graze is able to be tanked even if casted inside the opponent, yeah?
- 4,933
- 2,796
- Thread starter
- #48
He doesn't, our assess were just too lazy to find some
Is there a way to note his durability covers both internal and external?
- 219
- 130
Well, it already covers the fact attacks like Jio Graze don't really affect mythical era demons even when it explodes inside of them in his resistances section
' (Can resist being burned by fire and electricity by shielding himself with magic power. Demons from the Mythical Era like Anos are remain unaffected from having fire based attacks explode within them) '
So less you want it to be stated somewhere like those notes at the bottom of some profiles, can just be put next to whatever ability EGA is listed as in the same resistance section. That, or the durability section.
- 1,795
- 5,301
i agree
- 219
- 130
Sort of unrelated buuut, 'Lilith Asami supremacy', nice.
- 219
- 130
However, feat for both AP and Durability aside, I can say I agree.
- 42
- 33
That's what I asked. World's traces or world's past was contained by LoT, I just wanna confirm that why world's past and LoT are separate things? Because timeline LoT is the world's past itself, which means, both are unity of space-time continuum, both not separate and world's past only not equivalent to L2C structure. (CMIIW)
And If i wrong, why world's past and LoT are separate things? And why world's past was equivalent to mortal universe or L2C structure? Is not that just "timeline"?
- 4,933
- 2,796
- Thread starter
- #54
They are not the same. A single universe in Maou is split into the World of the Gods (Azure sky) and the world of mortals (normal universe). The Azure sky hosts multiple dimensions and holds the domains of different gods.
The mortal world is your standard universal model (3-A), the timeline (past) of this universe is contained inside the Land of Traces.
The land of traces isn't the past, it's the order that govern, records, the past of the world (mortal world)
- 1,795
- 5,301
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,414
- 2,858
Actually yes, that's why I thought 2-B, possibly 2-A would be better. But it's okay I guess.
- 36
- 1
The Land of Traces is not a world of infinite size.
I looked at the original text, and it doesn't say infinite.
Please refer to the link for more details.
- 219
- 130
I think you need to reply in english-.
- 36
- 1
- 4,489
- 5,252
While it doesn't exactly say infinite it's still a descriptor for something infinite or of that extent is it not?
- 4,933
- 2,796
- Thread starter
- #61
Don't see how that makes it not infinite. The word is still a descriptor for something that's endless in other words, infinite.
- 36
- 1
無辺 implies no physical limits or boundaries.
無限 implies no limits at all, in any sense.
Last edited:
- 219
- 130
No physical boundary, with countless bookshelves that never filled it completely-.
Sounds fine to me
Sounds fine to me
- 36
- 1
Infinite and Endless
Just wanted to ask, What is the difference between infinite and Endless on this wiki.
As I understand it, endless and infinite are treated differently. Is this correct?
- 10,917
- 4,018
endless is treated as infinite here unless its a hyperbole
its not a hyperbole in this case
its not a hyperbole in this case
- 219
- 130
The context here fits more for infinity really
- 42
- 33
So, World's past or timeline only is 3A Structure?
- 4,933
- 2,796
- Thread starter
- #68
No physical limits or boundaries in relation to a space is just another way of saying endless, boundless, infinite etc
No, both are the same especially in relation to size.Infinite and Endless
Just wanted to ask, What is the difference between infinite and Endless on this wiki.vsbattles.com
As I understand it, endless and infinite are treated differently. Is this correct?
- 4,933
- 2,796
- Thread starter
- #69
I said the mortal universe is 3-A, adding a timeline to a universe (3-A) sized model makes it Low 2-C.
- 36
- 1
What I'm talking about is the following
For example, it could be empty space. Let's think of all space as a flat surface, extending infinitely in all directions. No matter how far we go, if we cannot reach a limit of this space, it will be both infinite and unlimited. On the other hand, let's think of space as the surface of a ball. We cannot reach the border of space by walking in this space. What we will do is continually return to where we were before. Therefore, this space has no boundaries, but we can say that it is finite because its size is finite, that is, this space is not infinite.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 15,435
- 11,260
Show the scan where the size was stated to be finite?
- 4,933
- 2,796
- Thread starter
- #72
What you're doing is semantics not to mention it's stated nowhere that the space is looped considering there is such a thing already but doesn't apply to the LoT.
- 36
- 1
This comment is just an example of how boundaryless might not be interpreted as infinite.
- 219
- 130
That bit is for the black sky/firmament, isn't it?
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 15,435
- 11,260
So it's your assumptions with nothing to back it up?
- 219
- 130
The example doesn't really fit anything else nor does the L.O.T really imply less though..
- 4,933
- 2,796
- Thread starter
- #77
Yeah but even the black sky expands infinitely and rather than being looped it's more like space distorts when you try to exceed the speed of it's expansion.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 15,435
- 11,260
Still world is stated to be infinite. Even from outside POV.
- 36
- 1
If Battlewiki's rule is to interpret anything without physical boundaries as infinite unless it's explicitly stated that space repeats, I can't help it.
Vietthai96
He/Him- 9,356
- 12,537
Translation war again really, where can i escapes from this shit??
- Status
