- 9
- 1
Seems good to me tiktok scalers will be so happy about this hhh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They're the ones who remain the problem.Seems good to me tiktok scalers will be so happy about this hhh
I'm not saying it's not AP, but a lot of Anos's Durability stuff is blank, so it would be cool if it was used for both or something, idk.The source increases magic power when in danger of elimination. Magic power is a UES in the verse, so it would be a matter of AP too.
I actually agree for this, I never knew why this wasn't put down as any sort of durability for him either. It works for both.I'm not saying it's not AP, but a lot of Anos's Durability stuff is blank, so it would be cool if it was used for both or something, idk.
Oh yeah, this actually a good idea, because he seems to lack a good durability feat (and feats in general for durability).I'm not saying it's not AP, but a lot of Anos's Durability stuff is blank, so it would be cool if it was used for both or something, idk.
Oh yeah, this actually a good idea, because he seems to lack a good durability feat (and feats in general for durability).
He doesn't, our assess were just too lazy to find someOh yeah, this actually a good idea, because he seems to lack a good durability feat (and feats in general for durability).
Is there a way to note his durability covers both internal and external?I always wondered why in the past it wasn't a durability feat as much it was AP, considering he wasn't instantly evaporated. Not only that, he brought the flames INTO HIMSELF. So not only does it work for external, but internal like with how Jio Graze is able to be tanked even if casted inside the opponent, yeah?
Well, it already covers the fact attacks like Jio Graze don't really affect mythical era demons even when it explodes inside of them in his resistances sectionIs there a way to note his durability covers both internal and external?
Sort of unrelated buuut, 'Lilith Asami supremacy', nice.i agree
That's what I asked. World's traces or world's past was contained by LoT, I just wanna confirm that why world's past and LoT are separate things? Because timeline LoT is the world's past itself, which means, both are unity of space-time continuum, both not separate and world's past only not equivalent to L2C structure. (CMIIW)Still confused but going from what I understood your question to be...
Traces are the mortal universe past. That past is contained in the land of traces, both are separate things. In the first place, how will they be a unity?
They are not the same. A single universe in Maou is split into the World of the Gods (Azure sky) and the world of mortals (normal universe). The Azure sky hosts multiple dimensions and holds the domains of different gods.That's what I asked. World's traces or world's past was contained by LoT, I just wanna confirm that why world's past and LoT are separate things? Because timeline LoT is the world's past itself, which means, both are unity of space-time continuum, both not separate and world's past only not equivalent to L2C structure. (CMIIW)
And If i wrong, why world's past and LoT are separate things? And why world's past was equivalent to mortal universe or L2C structure? Is not that just "timeline"?
Sort of unrelated buuut, 'Lilith Asami supremacy', nice.
Actually yes, that's why I thought 2-B, possibly 2-A would be better. But it's okay I guess.i think he wants proof that there are an infinite number of universes
we just know that there are a lot, but we don't know if there are an infinite number of them
I think you need to reply in english-.
내 생각엔 영어로 대답해야 할 것 같아-.
While it doesn't exactly say infinite it's still a descriptor for something infinite or of that extent is it not?The Land of Traces is not a world of infinite size.
I looked at the original text, and it doesn't say infinite.
Please refer to the link for more details.
While it doesn't exactly say infinite it's still a descriptor for something infinite or of that extent is it not?
Don't see how that makes it not infinite. The word is still a descriptor for something that's endless in other words, infinite.
So, World's past or timeline only is 3A Structure?They are not the same. A single universe in Maou is split into the World of the Gods (Azure sky) and the world of mortals (normal universe). The Azure sky hosts multiple dimensions and holds the domains of different gods.
The mortal world is your standard universal model (3-A), the timeline (past) of this universe is contained inside the Land of Traces.
The land of traces isn't the past, it's the order that govern, records, the past of the world (mortal world)
No physical limits or boundaries in relation to a space is just another way of saying endless, boundless, infinite etc無邊 implies no physical limits or boundaries.
無限 implies no limits at all, in any sense.
No, both are the same especially in relation to size.Infinite and Endless
Just wanted to ask, What is the difference between infinite and Endless on this wiki.vsbattles.com
As I understand it, endless and infinite are treated differently. Is this correct?
So, World's past or timeline only is 3A Structure?
No physical limits or boundaries in relation to a space is just another way of saying endless, boundless, infinite etc
No, both are the same especially in relation to size.
Show the scan where the size was stated to be finite?What I'm talking about is the following
For example, it could be empty space. Let's think of all space as a flat surface, extending infinitely in all directions. No matter how far we go, if we cannot reach a limit of this space, it will be both infinite and unlimited. On the other hand, let's think of space as the surface of a ball. We cannot reach the border of space by walking in this space. What we will do is continually return to where we were before. Therefore, this space has no boundaries, but we can say that it is finite because its size is finite, that is, this space is not infinite.
What you're doing is semantics not to mention it's stated nowhere that the space is looped considering there is such a thing already but doesn't apply to the LoT.What I'm talking about is the following
For example, it could be empty space. Let's think of all space as a flat surface, extending infinitely in all directions. No matter how far we go, if we cannot reach a limit of this space, it will be both infinite and unlimited. On the other hand, let's think of space as the surface of a ball. We cannot reach the border of space by walking in this space. What we will do is continually return to where we were before. Therefore, this space has no boundaries, but we can say that it is finite because its size is finite, that is, this space is not infinite.
This comment is just an example of how boundaryless might not be interpreted as infinite.Show the scan where the size was stated to be finite?
That bit is for the black sky/firmament, isn't it?What you're doing is semantics not to mention it's stated nowhere that the space is looped considering there is such a thing already but doesn't apply to the LoT.
So it's your assumptions with nothing to back it up?This comment is just an example of how boundaryless might not be interpreted as infinite.
The example doesn't really fit anything else nor does the L.O.T really imply less though..This comment is just an example of how boundaryless might not be interpreted as infinite.
Yeah but even the black sky expands infinitely and rather than being looped it's more like space distorts when you try to exceed the speed of it's expansion.That bit is for the black sky/firmament, isn't it?
Still world is stated to be infinite. Even from outside POV.That bit is for the black sky/firmament, isn't it?
What you're doing is semantics not to mention it's stated nowhere that the space is looped considering there is such a thing already but doesn't apply to the LoT.