- 32,835
- 38,104
Request to close this thread. Stomp in favor of Touhou.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I forgot to say... Handled.As accepted in this CRT, Magneto's profile should be renamed to "Magneto (FOX: Pre-Retcon)"
ThanksI forgot to say... Handled.
@Expectro2000xxxJust to make sure, the Striking Strength section list the tiers with class instead of level right? Because Promezwein have changed various profiles (below are some of them) from class to level so I want to confirm if that is fine or not.
Already saw the thread.@Expectro2000xxx
Please see our highlighted thread regarding this issue. You can find it via a popup message or our forum's front page.
I have asked about it:Can Someone close this thread.
Thanks for closing
Thanks.I handled it.
Equipment is more of a generalization, it's seemingly more of a term for something that you can just use in battle, whether it hurts your opponent or not.I think that we should probably remove the following category, as it is too similar to a company category spanning characters from many different verses, which we do not allow.
Disney Villains
vsbattles.fandom.com
The character pages in the Image Comics category need to get categories for their own verses that act as sub-categories for the Image Comics category instead.
Image Comics
vsbattles.fandom.com
Should the name of this very important category be changed to "Equipment" instead? It seems more accurate.
Weapons
vsbattles.fandom.com
That probably depends on what the purpose of the category itself is and how the category is being used. If the intent of the "Weapons" category is in line with what MonkeMan stated, then it's probably more appropriate to use "Equipment" as a category term instead. I guess it helps that the term is more broad than the term "weapons".Should the name of this very important category be changed to "Equipment" instead? It seems more accurate.
Weapons
vsbattles.fandom.com
Yes, that is my intended point. A large part of the nonsentient items in our Weapons category are not actually weapons, and it would be much more convenient for indexing purposes to use something more inclusive.Equipment is more of a generalization, it's seemingly more of a term for something that you can just use in battle, whether it hurts your opponent or not.
Like the Dials from One Piece, for example. Or a Jetpack. Weapons are usually used to be a detriment to your opponent while Equipment can have many uses.
No. Sorry, but your claim was ridiculous. KingTempest was right to close your thread. We cannot waste time on absolutely anything, no matter how outlandish.reopen this thread https://vsbattles.com/threads/one-piece-planet-size-upgrade.146217/#post-5302922
The mod that closed this thread
1. Did not give significant evidence that proves my claim is invalid
2. Did not give me the opportunity of rebuttal
That is correct, yes.That probably depends on what the purpose of the category itself is and how the category is being used. If the intent of the "Weapons" category is in line with what MonkeMan stated, then it's probably more appropriate to use "Equipment" as a category term instead. I guess it helps that the term is more broad than the term "weapons".
@DarkDragonMedeus @SomebodyData @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Andytrenom @Ultima_Reality @Mr._Bambu @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @LordGriffin1000 @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutzI think that we should probably remove the following category, as it is too similar to a company category spanning characters from many different verses, which we do not allow.
Disney Villains
vsbattles.fandom.com
The character pages in the Image Comics category need to get categories for their own verses that act as sub-categories for the Image Comics category instead.
Image Comics
vsbattles.fandom.com
Should the name of this very important category be changed to "Equipment" instead? It seems more accurate.
Weapons
vsbattles.fandom.com
kuma's repulsion was already accepted at sol, iirc, theres no headcanon or anything on my partNo. Sorry, but your claim was ridiculous. KingTempest was right to close your thread. We cannot waste time on absolutely anything, no matter how outlandish.
Is it possible to know more about what is specifically "not allowed" when it comes to handling categories or simply just situations similar to this one?I think that we should probably remove the following category, as it is too similar to a company category spanning characters from many different verses, which we do not allow.
Disney Villains
vsbattles.fandom.com
Alright, I wont press on the topic any furtherIt was just a planning glitch on the author's part. It doesn't make any coherent sense with a One Piece planet that is the size of several solar systems.
Alright, I wont press on the topic any further
Well, for organisation purposes, company categories are over-categories for indexing verse pages and verse categories, not individual characters.Is it possible to know more about what is specifically "not allowed" when it comes to handling categories or simply just situations similar to this one?
Oh, okay. If it's not allowed, then I agree with its removal. The "Villains" category does the job for that anyways, the Disney one is just more specific. Also, I think we should also be more transparent about the quoted text, though I don't know where or on what page that should be stated on.Well, for organisation purposes, company categories are over-categories for indexing verse pages and verse categories, not individual characters.
I am fine with this decision.@DarkDragonMedeus @SomebodyData @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Andytrenom @Ultima_Reality @Mr._Bambu @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @LordGriffin1000 @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz
Since the last case is a major change, we likely need some highly qualified input here.
Apologies, but re-asking this.A Versus Thread that I made. Part of the match conditions (at the time of my posting this here & now.) include this:
""Nen Crush" is restricted. (Knuckle cannot & will not cause Knuckles to lose as a result of exposure to Knuckle's aura's match-loss-causing Death Manipulation, Fear Manipulation, &/or Paralysis Inducement.) Other uses of Nen are stil allowed."
Seemingly per Versus Thread Rules, @StrymULTRA argued that abilities that don't affect tier cannot be restricted.
- It is not fine to restrict abilities in a versus matchup, implicitly or expressly. Matches that are arranged this way should not be added to the character profiles, as they don't involve their full potential, and are only intended for casual entertainment. An exception would be if the restricted ability/technique has a separate tier from the main one, and is one the character can consciously restrict themselves from using. In this case, the match can be added. The match can also be added if Optional Equipments such as optional power-ups and items are restricted, or if the ability being restricted is indexed after a "Likely" or "Possibly" conditional.
My own response was: "I thought you could, it just meant that the match wouldn't be able to be added to profiles.".
Thus, StrymUltra proposed to me:
The thread should be moved to Fun & Games.
However, I wonder if some alternatives would be viable:
A. Can the match be fair with Nen unrestricted? Is it likely that an in-character Knuckle's Nen "Nen Crushes" someone? Does IDW Knuckles have anything analogous to Nen to not be as vulnerable to Nen Crush as a regular person? I know IDW Knuckles has Extrasensory Perception, at least.
B. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Versus_Thread_Rules
I could just specify the method of victory to be KO (Knock-Out), since, IIRC, "Nen Crush", causes Death, Paralysis, &/or Fear, but may not necessarily knock the victim out, right?
- It is strongly suggested to detail the scenario of the battle, by giving details such as a location, the method of victory (e.g. KO, death), whether the combatants have preparation time, are blood-lusted or in character, which version of the characters are being used, and so on.
I'd like to know which options would be viable & reasonable options. I'd prefer to have the thread not be a "Nen Crush" stomp, be on the Versus Threads board (As opposed to being moved to F&G if a viable alternative is available.), & if possible, be valid to be added to profiles.
After hearing Butler's thoughts on the matter, I'm fine with changing Weapons to Equipment.I think that we should probably remove the following category, as it is too similar to a company category spanning characters from many different verses, which we do not allow.
Disney Villains
vsbattles.fandom.com
The character pages in the Image Comics category need to get categories for their own verses that act as sub-categories for the Image Comics category instead.
Image Comics
vsbattles.fandom.com
Should the name of this very important category be changed to "Equipment" instead? It seems more accurate.
Weapons
vsbattles.fandom.com