• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Persona General Revisions Part 3: Low 1-C, Immeasurable, and Cognition

Status
Not open for further replies.
Milly is busy with school from what I recall, and I think we've added a slew of explicit evidence that back up the overarching point of the Cosmology blog. At this point touching on those things is probably what needs to happen to efficiently resolve the thread.

The relevant posts for reference
 
Not to derail, but there are a ton of profiles in Persona that are still Low 2-C despite scaling directly to 2-B characters (Mitsuru and Yosuke for example). I bumped Erebus up to 2-B myself because it said it scaled to late game Makoto Yuki, who was already 2-B.
 
Not to derail, but there are a ton of profiles in Persona that are still Low 2-C despite scaling directly to 2-B characters (Mitsuru and Yosuke for example). I bumped Erebus up to 2-B myself because it said it scaled to late game Makoto Yuki, who was already 2-B.
Noticed, thanks for all the work, could use some adjustments but it's appreciated.
 
@Matthew_Schroeder In the interest of time, and since you are the main opposition, I'd appreciate if you would respond to the post I put together showing relevant posts. I feel this had dragged on for quite some time and the thread is being buried outside of random bumps.
 
Okay. Thank you for the information. Ultima is usually very reliable.
 
I'm very sorry to have forgotten to respond to this thread for so long. I'm normally very active with Persona revisions, but beyond having taken a glance at the justification blog prior to this CRT being released, I haven't said anything on here.

I'll need to take a proper look through all the prior posts in the thread to come to a fully knowledgeable conclusion on all the arguments and counter-arguments. However, if it's any help, I've expressed support for the original blog post in the past (as mentioned in the OP), so I'm obviously currently leaning on supporting the upgrades.
 
So can we give it till Friday and if Matt doesn't respond, take votes/give concluding statements? Thread hasn't had any real progress since Jan 14th, maybe even earlier.
 
We'd aught to be patient. It's easy to get a bit antsy when an important revision is put on hold due to the lack of activity of a single member, but chances are, they're not responding because they have something more important they're attending to.
 
We'd aught to be patient. It's easy to get a bit antsy when an important revision is put on hold due to the lack of activity of a single member, but chances are, they're not responding because they have something more important they're attending to.
I get that, but again.

January 14th. It's almost February. We've all been patient. I think giving it till Friday or next week has been plenty of time.
 
No problem. I suppose that we can wait for a while longer, and hope that you will feel better soon.

As usual, I recommend nature walks, upbeat well-made cartoons and music, meeting pets (preferably dogs), exercise, meditation, proper sleep, and possibly reliable self-help books and friendly therapy forums. Also, mind detoxification from overly depressing unnecessary input is probably a good idea.
 
@Antvasima
I think it is fair to call it here. Been about a week with solid chances for replies. Thread is stalling pretty hard. I think we have a pretty strong case here and no one has argued for why the Low 1-C feat would be invalid. Majority of voters here are for the pro position and most mods are neutral leaning for or in agreeance. Can we move on to scaling now?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top