Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The new "Non-dualism" type sucks ass. It practically dosen't explain anything. All that's explained is how you can get rid of non dualism on characters that have it.I once again reiterate, read the new page. The standards on Transduality aren't the same as before.
Also, predating dualities by that very definition would mean they don't bind you, since you exist independently of them.
Essentially, like conceptual transfer, conceptual sealing, conceptual sealing (etc.) can negate this.Shrugs
That's the new standard, whether we like it or not. My point is that here isn't the place to debate the change itself.
Also, it's at its core just "I exist independent to X duality so using X duality to attack me won't work". High level metaphysical powers like Law Manipulation, Conceptual Manipulation etc. can get around that.
That's what happens when a thread gets accepted without input from knowledgeable staffexisting before dualities give you nonduality???
anyway put me as neutral
So, how can you call creation of this a "transduality"?In-Betweener is literally embodiment of all opposite forces and dualities.
Dude, you didn't even know how many staff there were in that thread. So don't talk too much and change the standards if you don't like it, I didn't agree either but that's the way it isThat's what happens when a thread gets accepted without input from knowledgeable staff
A 6 page thread with every relevant staff member in regards to the page and the upper levels of the tiering system participating in it... was accepted without input from "knowledgeable staff"? Is that just a term being thrown around or do you genuinely believe some hidden Transduality staff weren't consulted? What a baffling comment.That's what happens when a thread gets accepted without input from knowledgeable staff
I'm not arguing for R>F here at all. I just seriously can not see how that makes Primordials non dual, like at all.So, how can you call creation of this a "transduality"?
If the dualities are here, there is no problem in that regard, the problem is transcendence
Well, the main argument is that the primordials are outside and independent of them, but also exist before them (existing before them is just an additional supporting element).I'm not arguing for R>F here at all. I just seriously can not see how that makes Primordials non dual, like at all.
But how though? They are the concepts themselves (in this case dualities) not outside these concepts.Well, the main argument is that the primordials are outside and independent of them, but also exist before them (existing before them is just an additional supporting element).
Uhhhh.... what?That's what happens when a thread gets accepted without input from knowledgeable staff
They are just the concepts themselves, not the dualities. There may be concepts that are outside of dualities or transcendentBut how though? They are the concepts themselves (in this case dualities) not outside these concepts.
Did the Gow devs ever imply this?Also, it's at its core just "I exist independent to X duality so using X duality to attack me won't work".
We index what we can observe from series according to our standards so this comment doesn't even make sense. Like, this is the second time you've implied that we need WoG for tiering purposes, which is silly as all hell.Did the Gow devs ever imply this?
Or the standards are doing the heavy lifting
Dualities are just opposite concepts.They are just the concepts themselves, not the dualities. There may be concepts that are outside of dualities or transcendent
Good luck with that.So there's no proof of it. Because not even the fictional work imply any resistances, let alone immunity.
I might have to create a profile for "The Standards". That has got to be the most overpowered character on the wiki
.... Yeah... So?Dualities are just opposite concepts.
You didn't address my argument.... Yeah... So?
But how though? They are the concepts themselves (in this case dualities) not outside these concepts.
I've already touched on it. This is not a counter-argument, the concept itself, which can exist outside the duality system. Lol it's simple.You didn't address my argument
I don't see how Primordials are above this concepts/dualities. They ARE the very concepts that make up really, not something outside or independent of them.I've already touched on it. This is not a counter-argument, the concept itself, which can exist outside the duality system. Lol it's simple.
And yes, please don't make this a page-long discussion. Thank you!
I did.I think some people dont read what i write entirely and not read the current standard of nonduality
Ok, so? He merged two realities together, 2-C AP.Morpheus is literally said can merge the duality system, the all of creation, make he him self a nonduality of oneness. A one indivisible reality it self for long ago is already accepted as nonduality, even transduality in some case. Simulteneously 0 and 1 (true and false)
That's not stated on the page though.And in the current standard, you can have nonduality just by predate or being independent or outside from duality
Nothing good comes from bringing her, seriously she is just a bad omen at this point.Seriously. This thread is even more heated than Athena.
No, you didntI did.
Ok, so? He merged two realities together, 2-C AP.
You don't get Non Dualism from AP, Non Dualism is a state of being, that's like calling Omnipresence speed.
That's not stated on the page though.
Nonduality: Characters with this type of nonduality exist outside and independently of the logical systems they're nondual regarding without transcending them on any level.
Don't go over this topic because you haven't read the new thread and the page hasn't been refreshed yet. That thread was already 6 pages of hell, don't do that here too.That's not stated on the page though.
No, you didnt
He merge the dual system, just read
Keep stonewalling, i just see you even not read any of what that written
Alright, this kind of pretentious attitude dosen't belong here. Goddamn defend your arguments or don't even bother to respond.Don't go over this topic because you haven't read the new thread and the page hasn't been refreshed yet. That thread was already 6 pages of hell, don't do that here too.
so verse now just need mention light and darkness, no need to elaborate, they get duality???, then predate light and darkness mean you nonduality??, lolGuys, “light and darkness” are the most fundamental dualities. In fact, it is one of the most cited examples of dualism.
Huh... What else did you expect the duality to be? The concept of being opposites of each other, fully extended on the plane of reality, is a duality in the wiki.
You don't need statements like "duality" directly
thats what i was thinkingso verse now just need mention light and darkness, they get duality???, then predate light and darkness mean you nonduality??, lol
No bruh not that oneNon duality ? So it become less strict now ? Light of Alfheim Nonduality too then (stated to be transcend life and death) ? i believe life and death are implied to be dual system in GoW. (souls in GoW has CM type 3 properties btw)