- 4,187
- 1,484
What would happen to Zygarde?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think 50% still scales as usual, but with “5-B, likely High 3-A”What would happen to Zygarde?
He and the other 4-Bs would be upgraded too. Given "likely High 3-A"What would happen to Zygarde?
or something like this^I think he still scales as usual, but with a “possibly High 3-A”
You can react and keep up with infinite speed actually. So I think infinite speed necrozma should be a thing. There are multiple degrees of infinityWell the point wasn't that Necrozma gets High 3-A for absorbing stars in infinite universes (which should be infinite regardless?) but that he's lighting up all of Ultra Space (which is now an infinite realm) and having his light go into an infinite number of worlds, which still grants infinite energy and thus High 3-A.
Also no, if infinite speed comes from Necrozmas light, it scales all around as Necrozmas light can be reacted to and kept up with.
I never denied that. I was just responding to an earlier point that if Necrozma's light feat grants infinite speed, it would scale all around to him and the legendaries that scale down from him just as the MFTL+ ratings do.You can react and keep up with infinite speed actually. So I think infinite speed necrozma should be a thing. There are multiple degrees of infinity
Its very possible to have a lower degree of infinite speedHow do you downscale from infinite? Is it a lesser scale of it?
yes, and ultraspace is infinite aswell so lighting it all up would get high 3-A since necrozma lights the entire thing up at least from how I remember itDoesn't the infinite space and time thing refer to infinite universes, which is how Pokemon got 2-A? In terms of individual universes, space is referred to as expanding.
no, what i mean means is that there are an infinite amount of universes in ultraspace and necrozma lights them all upWell no, infinite universes =/= infinite sized universes.
They are stated to be infinite in size by lucian, eternatus has infinite energy, so does victini, so does lunala, mewtwo has an infinite power statement that was talking about its damage output which didn't sound too much like hyperbole then xerneas has a fewWell no, infinite universes =/= infinite sized universes.
Lucian's isn't flowery language due to the very fact that the game its coming from is the game Masuda's statement is directly applied to in the first place.The Lucien statement was a quote from an artist and clearly flowery language. It was the Masuda statement that was accepted as legit. Also we don't accept infinite power statements.
Im not seeing why this matters for Ultra Space since either way you slice it, Ultra Space needs to be infinite in size because its connecting to infinite universes via infinite Ultra Wormholes. That means the size of Ultra Space has to be infinite in order for that to be the case.From what was accepted from the 2-A thread, there are around 40 million multiverses with infinite universes. These infinite universes come from the Masuda statement of infinite space + time, referring to infinite parallel dimensions by Palkia's statement, backed by several proofs of MWI theory. We knew the latter before, but the former gives it a sense of scale.
Each of these infinite parallel universes has a Distortion World, a reflection cave, a spirit world, and an Ultra Space among other worlds. There's infinite Ultra Spaces, each with a Necrozma. The size of Ultra Space shouldn't have been changed. This is what I understand to be the case from the evidence presented.
Uh, what? From what I know, we very much do downscaling for both of them. Low 2-C at the very least.You can’t downscale from infinite for the same reason you can’t downscale from Low 2C, you can only upscale from baseline infinity.
Tbh, Saman, Eficiente and Executor accepted it being "likely High 3-A" in size, so if anything, it should be "4-B, possibly 3-A"The Lucien statement was a quote from an artist and clearly flowery language. It was the Masuda statement that was accepted as legit. Also we don't accept infinite power statements.
From what was accepted from the 2-A thread, there are around 40 million multiverses with infinite universes. These infinite universes come from the Masuda statement of infinite space + time, referring to infinite parallel dimensions by Palkia's statement, backed by several proofs of MWI theory. We knew the latter before, but the former gives it a sense of scale.
Each of these infinite parallel universes has a Distortion World, a reflection cave, a spirit world, and an Ultra Space among other worlds. There's infinite Ultra Spaces, each with a Necrozma. The size of Ultra Space shouldn't have been changed. This is what I understand to be the case from the evidence presented.
This is an exampleQuick question, has there ever been a vs thread where a infinite spees character blitzed the othed?
When? You can’t downscale low 2C to 3A unless you’re dragon ballUh, what? From what I know, we very much do downscaling for both of them. Low 2-C at the very least.
But this should also go for infinite speed as we allow for one character with the rating to be faster or slower than another with infinite speed.
Ohhh okay, never mind then. I interpreted this the wrong way. My bad.When? You can’t downscale low 2C to 3A unless you’re dragon ball
you can’t downscale infinite to MFTL+
Sure but at the same time, im failing to see how its flowery when its also backing up the said concept that's being implemented into the game. Something that's backed up by another isn't flowery, or rather it has less chances of being flowery if its not just its own standalone thing. Said only once? You definitely could argue that. But backed up by something else? Not so much. And the statement is accepted as part of the supporting evidence anyway."Lucian's isn't flowery language due to the very fact that the game its coming from is the game Masuda's statement is directly applied to in the first place."
Uh what? Masuda making a statement about a game doesn't mean every statement from that game has to be taken at face value. Sure, the statement ends up being true, but the quote's clearly about how beautiful space is and stuff rather than giving a quantifiable metric of how big the multiverse is. Also it's not Lucian's quote technically, he's quoting some random artist.
Uh, from the quote of infinite time and infinite space from Masuda? Countless in this context becomes infinite as a result of that, as specified in the accepted blog."Im not seeing why this matters for Ultra Space since either way you slice it, Ultra Space needs to be infinite in size because its connecting to infinite universes via infinite Ultra Wormholes. That means the size of Ultra Space has to be infinite in order for that to be the case."
What I'm saying is that the 2-A comes from there being an infinite amount of parallel dimensions. So there's an infinite number of Ultra Spaces, each with its own Necrozma and a countless number of Ultra Beast homeworlds. Where does infinite wormholes come from then?
PleaseCan we just get the calc accepted please? We all know that High 3-A ain't going through, so let's just stick to what is going through.
Ah sure, I'll drop this now.Please
Do High 3A on a DIFFERENT THREAD
Yeah sorry. I thought it was important to mention it here since it directly affects the feat. But I'll save all this for my thread when I make it.Please
Do High 3A on a DIFFERENT THREAD
This low end is ready to go.They responded on my blog post
Necrozoma: Absorbing the light of the universe
vsbattles.fandom.com
And gave up a low end calc for 1.198368*10^66 J, slightly above baseline 3-C
Btw, just real quick, I want to also apologize if I came off a bit rude or condescending on this part with the "uh" remark."Uh, from the quote of of infinite time and infinite space from Masuda? Countless in this context becomes infinite as a result of that, as specified in the accepted blog."
I listed the parts of the thread that were explicitly accepted above, as well as my interpretation of the Masuda statement. Could you be more specific here?
8x below multi galaxyHow high above baseline is it?