Nasuverse: 6-C Mages

[BasedNecoScaler69]

Kuzuki got amped ten times to regular human or something so that alone debunks the OP

how does that debunk the OP? if anything that makes the gap smaller, which is obviously not true

 

[BasedNecoScaler69]

 

[Tatsumi504]

how does that debunk the OP? if anything that makes the gap smaller, which is obviously not true

It debunks it because 10x regular human is street level not Island level unless regular humans are mountain level, the math isn't mathing

 

[KingNanaya]

how about we just don't use Nasu interviews for scaling purposes, since he's consistently contradictory to his own statements

 

[TheSilverKing14]

how about we just don't use Nasu interviews for scaling purposes, since he's consistently contradictory to his own statements

I agree but the best way to go that route is to use the statements of his that are not contradicted and disregard the ones that are like Arc vs Gilgamesh was a not serious answer iirc and Shiki vs Shirou one falls apart lore wise.

 

[Benimōru]

Is there any feat to support this statement? Or do we only have WoG?

 

[BasedNecoScaler69]

Is there any feat to support this statement? Or do we only have WoG?

just WoG at this point, but that seems to apply to a lot of the nasuverse.

 

[Benimōru]

just WoG at this point, but that seems to apply to a lot of the nasuverse.

Well, if there is no feat to support WoG, then the statement should not be considered accurate according to the rules.

Author statements will only be accepted when they clarify what has been shown or implied in the series itself, and will be rejected when they contradict what has been shown to the audience. Statements that technically do not contradict anything shown in the series will still be rejected if there is no evidence that they are accurate.

But if we're evaluate this differently from verse to verse, then IDK. I'll remain neutral for now

 

[KingNanaya]

I agree but the best way to go that route is to use the statements of his that are not contradicted and disregard the ones that are like Arc vs Gilgamesh was a not serious answer iirc and Shiki vs Shirou one falls apart lore wise.

of course. if stuff he says lines up with what we're shown in series, then there's no reason to not use it as support.

 

[Violatas]

Anyways why is this thread still ongoing? OP doesn't seem interested in continuing it, and I think its kinda handily rejected at this point.
Unfollowing

use the statements of his that are not contradicted and disregard the ones that are like Arc vs Gilgamesh was a not serious answer iirc and Shiki vs Shirou one falls apart lore wise.

Will say I agree with this, but judging by some insane scaling on this site, and how much of the profiles are based off these statements, I don't ever see the WoG Nasu stuff being properly handled here. Would take a massive CRT. I'm open to rejecting them all if only because its gotten annoying seeing blatant double standards on how they should be used; won't call out names though.

Anyways, my last comment here. Thread should honestly be closed at this point.

 

[TheSilverKing14]

Anyways why is this thread still ongoing? OP doesn't seem interested in continuing it, and I think its kinda handily rejected at this point.
Unfollowing

Will say I agree with this, but judging by some insane scaling on this site, and how much of the profiles are based off these statements, I don't ever see the WoG Nasu stuff being properly handled here. Would take a massive CRT. I'm open to rejecting them all if only because its gotten annoying seeing blatant double standards on how they should be used; won't call out names though.

Anyways, my last comment here. Thread should honestly be closed at this point.

I agree but if you have questions ask on my message wall I am not as active on threads as I am on my wall so whatever you have I can answer it besides, my real views can be conveyed easier on there too.

 

[CRIMPSUMPSKI2]

this thread can be closed

 

[LephyrTheRevanchist]

this thread can be closed

Done