- 253
- 32
Saibaman via Golden Void reasons
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I direct you to this calc: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Darkanine/Dragon_Ball_Z:_Piccolo's_Moonbust_revisited Which conclusively proves that Piccolo was low-end planet level by busting the moon as he did, based solely on the manga.CryoTheMayo said:...Naruto. I have no idea how anyone would argue for the Saibaman here. Naruto has ridiculous experience, adaptive capabilities, a diverse toolset etc etc. Not to mention his regenerative abilities and Kurama cloak for defenses. Could somebody explain to me the logic of having a Saibaman as Tier 5-B by the way? The earliest possible implication of planetary busters existing was Vegeta and that was with every drop of his base power and even then it would have arguably only razed the surface of the Earth rather than outright destroying it. Was it handled by scaling of moon-busting feats? Cuz power levels don't scale...like at all so I don't think that quite works. At most I would personally rate Raditz/Saibamen at Mid-High 5-C with Nappa being low 5-B and Vegeta being 5-B.
Even ignoring my own criticisms of the scaling, I don't think the Saibaman would win against Naruto either way. You have a stupid creature designed for kamikaze attacks against a person that can regenerate and just block it with an energy cloak, combined with the substitution technique and shadow clones.
They scale to being stronger by an unknown amount from a low-end 5-B feat.AstralKing7 said:so saibamen scale to a low end??
Naruto is 100 ZTKorudo Daio said:Naruto at his weakest is just above baseline planet level, though, so it's still pretty close tbh