• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Marvel Cosmology Downgrade

Status
Not open for further replies.
Beyond_transcending said:
How do you know that?
Click to expand...
Beyond Space, Beyond Time, A 16 Dimensional Domain. Here presence so far beyond mortal comprehension.

rco0331464519424-1540695012045587405192.jpg
 
Alonik said:
You only have one valid argument with evidence there, and the rest are just walls off text and don't compile more than one scan beyond the one everyone knows to show that Marvel consistently portrays the Zone as 3D, while @Ultima_Reality argued with several different comics that subspace and Crossroad is an infinite dimensional space (while both is a inner part of the Negative Zone), I even brought proof from other writers to support that.

So making an argument with a bunch of text when in fact this ''has always been portrayed as 3D'' is only based on a single scan against a vast majority of scans is bullshit.
Click to expand...
Just giving a suggestion.
If there's a proof of a High 1-B Negative Zone then when Marvel cosmology will be split, there should be one in which it is High 1-B and same with a 3-D Negative Zone .
 
Why wouldn't it? It's literally clarified to be a higher dimensional space even lessers wouldn't be able to comprehend.

It could mean 16th realm? I find that hard to belief especially how the scan displays it, but do you have proof where such was mentioned asin being called a 16th realm? If you have proof be my guest if not it's just headcanon.
 
Vasco said:
Why wouldn't it? It's literally clarified to be a higher dimensional space even lessers wouldn't be able to comprehend.
Click to expand...
Why would it? That just makes the realm beyond "lessers" comprehension.
Vasco said:
It could mean 16th realm? I find that hard to belief especially how the scan displays it, but do you have proof where such was mentioned asin being called a 16th realm? If you have proof be my guest if not it's just headcanon.
Click to expand...
I said could. A possibility. Not a claim.
 
Vasco said:
Why wouldn't it? It's literally clarified to be a higher dimensional space even lessers wouldn't be able to comprehend.

It could mean 16th realm? I find that hard to belief especially how the scan displays it, but do you have proof where such was mentioned asin being called a 16th realm? If you have proof be my guest if not it's just headcanon.
Click to expand...
genuinely cant see how it might be referring to something else other than spatial dimensions
 
Beyond_transcending said:
Why would it? That just makes the realm beyond "lessers" comprehension.

I said could. A possibility. Not a claim.
Click to expand...
And it's stated to be a 16 dimensional superspace, I don't see how someone can interpret that as something else if not it being higher dimensional, if you interpret it as 16 universes I'd have to tell you it makes no sense after everything being laid for us easy to understand in that panel.

Maybe's are nothing more than headcanon.
 
Vasco said:
And it's stated to be a 16 dimensional superspace, I don't see how someone can interpret that as something else if not it being higher dimensional, if you interpret it as 16 universes I'd have to tell you it makes no sense after everything being laid for us easy to understand in that panel.
Click to expand...
Vasco said:
Maybe's are nothing more than headcanon.
Click to expand...
Than what you're saying is also headcanon since you're assuming that "16-Dimensional" automatically means spatial.
 
Alonik said:
You only have one valid argument with evidence there, and the rest are just walls off text and don't compile more than one scan beyond the one everyone knows to show that Marvel consistently portrays the Zone as 3D, while @Ultima_Reality argued with several different comics that subspace and Crossroad is an infinite dimensional space (while both is a inner part of the Negative Zone), I even brought proof from other writers to support that.

So making an argument with a bunch of text when in fact this ''has always been portrayed as 3D'' is only based on a single scan against a vast majority of scans is bullshit.
Click to expand...
I referenced several stories (with specific issue references) from recent years in which the Negative Zone has been explicitly shown to be a regular-sized universe that borders to the main Marvel universe, and it doesn't make any sense for all Marvel universes to be infinite-dimensional. It would wipe out all tier 2 statistics for all Marvel Comics characters and replace them with High 1-B instead, so we would give every single herald-level character "At least 3-C, likely High 1-B" ratings, for example, which doesn't make any sense whatsoever, regardless how contrived rationalisations we try to use, especially as Marvel Comics has previously clearly established the Negative Zone or the regular universes that it corresponds to as being either 3-dimensional or 4-dimensional, and even Wikipedia lists the Negative Zone as corresponding to a regular universe except for being made of anti-matter.

As such, given that mathematics easily enable higher-dimensional spaces to intersect with lower-dimensional ones, and given that such nexuses have been firmly established to exist for Marvel Comics, including the M'Krann Crystal, Captain Britain's lighthouse, the Crossroads dimension, or the Nexus of Realities, I find it far more logical to interpret this as being the case here as well.
 
Deagonx said:
They just want to argue so they choose the most obvious things to try and bicker about.
Click to expand...
What? I never said I agreed with Beyond Transcending, and he didn't say he agreed with me. Not sure why you are grouping us.
Antvasima said:
Well, I apologise if I was being too rude then. I tend to get suspicious if other members seem to repeatedly be too unreasonable/stonewalling and upgrade-hungry in combination.
Click to expand...
Thank you, but I am not really upgrade-hungry, I have argued against higher statistics in the past, such as Superboy-Prime and Rune King Thor. I have also repeatedly argued against Cosmic Armor Superman wank, which even Deagon can confirm. I just generally have higher statistics than him.
 
Transcending said:
Not sure why you are grouping us.
Click to expand...
Because you have the same name, like all of each others comments, and both of you are trying to argue against extremely obvious conclusions. In addition to the fact that you both just got unbanned from your groups vote manipulation behavior.
 
Transcending said:
Thank you, but I am not really upgrade-hungry, I have argued against higher statistics in the past, such as Superboy-Prime and Rune King Thor. I have also repeatedly argued against Cosmic Armor Superman wank, which even Deagon can confirm. I just generally have higher statistics than him.
Click to expand...
Okay. That is good then.
 
Deagonx said:
Because you have the same name
Click to expand...
Not exactly the same, but similar names, and we have similar names because we know each other from off-site. Ik multiple people from here off-site like the OP, @Joshn05 (someone who you yourself are friends with), etc.
Deagonx said:
like all of each others comments
Click to expand...
We haven't liked all of each others' comments no, just most of them. I like a lot of people's comments, not just Beyond Transcending. I generally like those people's comments that I agree with, that are neutral but responded(in a neutral or positive way) to me, or like my own comments.
Deagonx said:
and both of you are trying to argue against extremely obvious conclusions.
Click to expand...
That is subjective.
Deagonx said:
In addition to the fact that you both just got unbanned
Click to expand...
And in the drama, proof was provided we do disagree with each other at times.

Me and Beyond Transcending have multiple disagreements, for example I have DC>Marvel, he has Marvel>DC, I have Perpetua above Phoenix, he has Phoenix above Perpetua, etc.
 
Last edited:
Antvasima said:
Can each of you first write single explanation posts for all of your relevant arguments here please?
Click to expand...
There's not much of an argument. Each of them is separately arguing something really silly that every other commenter has rejected. The "Macroverse" is just the opposite of the Microverse and the "16-dimensional domain" has 16 spatial dimensions. It's not pertinent to the main thread.
 
Yes, that seems self-evident based on consistent portrayals throughout Marvel's history, and should not require any massive derailing scaling discussions.
 
Antvasima said:
Yes, that seems self-evident based on consistent portrayals throughout Marvel's history, and should not require any massive derailing scaling discussions.
Click to expand...
Thats what everyone else concluded, yeah. Its very self-evident but I'm sure now that they're unbanned we are going to be bombarded with a lot of these types of arguments.
 
That unfortunately seems likely, yes. It will be hard to get anything productive done if they keep continuously stonewalling and derailing.
 
Antvasima said:
I referenced several stories (with specific issue references) from recent years in which the Negative Zone has been explicitly shown to be a regular-sized universe that borders to the main Marvel universe.
Click to expand...
Scans with being 3-D sized, please. Let's not take one word as a rule, let's analyze consistency of scans, if you can collaborate by collecting them to show everyone that would be great.

Antvasima said:
and it doesn't make any sense for all Marvel universes to be infinite-dimensional. It would wipe out all tier 2 statistics for all Marvel Comics characters and replace them with High 1-B instead, so we would give every single herald-level character "At least 3-C, likely High 1-B" ratings, for example, which doesn't make any sense whatsoever, regardless how contrived rationalisations we try to use, especially as Marvel Comics has previously clearly established the Negative Zone or the regular universes that it corresponds to as being either 3-dimensional or 4-dimensional, and even Wikipedia lists the Negative Zone as corresponding to a regular universe except for being made of anti-matter.
Click to expand...
Writing what you think will not change some of the High 1-B cosmologies already shown to be 3-D sized. As such, that is not evidence to show a consistency of the Negative Zone being only 3D. Wikipedia is not a source for SCANS, if that is your source please remove your position already in any instance here in this thread about the Negative Zone. You are the only person who wants to dictate how the Negative Zone works, people bring in several different COSMOLOGIES from several different comics from several different writers with it being bigger than Low 1-C and your only had the excuse is to use Wikipedia or Marvel Database, it is not reliable information based on a in depth analysis of scans and different portrayals between writers, it is just your pure opinion reading a site that informs nothing regarding how we SPLIT and analysis this. If you don't have a vast majority of scans in different cosmologies proving an inconsistency as you speak and scans proving it Ultima's argument will prevail.

Antvasima said:
As such, given that mathematics easily enable higher-dimensional spaces to intersect with lower-dimensional ones, and given that such nexuses have been firmly established to exist for Marvel Comics, including the M'Krann Crystal, Captain Britain's lighthouse, the Crossroads dimension, or the Nexus of Realities, I find it far more logical to interpret this as being the case here as well.
Click to expand...
Prove your point, let's not use an individual interpretation without any analysis with scans proving that the Zone has no dimensionality greater than 5D.
 
Antvasima said:
That unfortunately seems likely, yes. It will be hard to get anything productive done if they keep continuously stonewalling and derailing.
Click to expand...
Deagon is straw manning my argument, so I ask you to read my stuff before jumping to conclusions.
Deagonx said:
The "Macroverse"
Click to expand...
That's a massive straw man, I asked you to prove the "universes-within-universes" was referring to the Microverse, you said the Microverse is the inverse of Macroverse and I pointed out some errors with your reasoning, but primarily, I was asking you how them being inverse to each other supports your argument. You NEVER answered that. It's a Non-Sequitur.
Deagonx said:
Thats what everyone else concluded, yeah
Click to expand...
Everyone else only disagreed with Beyond Transcending, not me, again, don't group us, I myself don't agree with BT on multiple things and vice versa.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

RoTt35
  • Locked
MCU Multiverse Downgrade
Replies
27
Views
4K
Planck69
Planck69
Elizio33
  • Locked
Crisis Cosmology: Scaling Characters
8 9 10
Replies
391
Views
21K
Elizio33
Elizio33
RoTt35
MCU Cosmology Update
Replies
19
Views
4K
BEYONDER19999
BEYONDER19999
ActuallySpaceMan42
Yin Tian Shen Yin Series | Cosmology & Verse Pages| Profile Addition & Profile Changes | High 1-A
2
Replies
79
Views
7K
YueNoMoral
YueNoMoral
  • Locked
Marvel Comics Cosmology Update (/Upgrade?)
Replies
14
Views
3K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top