Anyway, I doubt that anything will happen based on this thread alone, but would greatly appreciate help with setting up a knowledgeable cosmology investigations and revisions group.
He's effecitvely gone from the wiki.
That was only due to our old tiering system being immensely lower scaled than our current system.
Agreed. This is too disorganised. It is better if we just try to decide which scans/stories that we can continue to scale from, and which that are too unreliable, and should be removed.
Yes, with Impress and Confluctor gone, my impression is that our organisation for sensible Marvel Comics revisions have been going very badly and largely been driven by a need for upgrades rather than meticulous accuracy.
The subject I am talking about is for the Marvel verse, I just tried to explain with various cautionary words that it is useless to try to refute it.
Then I don't understand what you said above.
It seems like you are expressing frustration about the way that certain DC Comics storylines have been written and the way that characters are portrayed. It is important to remember that comic books, like all forms of media, are works of fiction and are created for entertainment purposes. Different writers and artists may have different approaches to storytelling and character development, and it is normal for there to be differences in interpretation and continuity within a franchise. Ultimately, it is up to the creators of the comic books to determine the direction of the storylines and the portrayal of the characters. As a fan, it is okay to have your own opinions and preferences, but it is important to respect the creative decisions of the people who are creating the content.
I definitely think I've been misunderstood or using the wrong sentence form.
It is not productive or healthy to try to “take revenge” on any particular media franchise or its fans. It is important to remember that media, including comic books, are created for entertainment purposes and that different people will have different opinions about what they enjoy. Rather than trying to seek revenge or cause conflict, it is better to focus on finding and enjoying media that speaks to you personally. It is okay to have preferences and to express them, but it is essential to do so respectfully and to recognize that other people may have different opinions.
I don't think there is anything wrong with the words I use 'revenge' is not an insult, slang or anything like that, it is not something that can be perceived as sarcasm even in the sentence I am using right now, you think very seriously.
I marvel downgrade was eventually gonna happen and looking at the OP profile and all o heavily doubt his a fan of DC either plus it dosen't matter if he has brought all the proof needed for the downgrade.
Yusuf is just derailing.
While the term “revenge” may not be destined as an insult or slang, it is a strong word that can have negative connotations. Seeking revenge usually implies a desire to harm or get back at someone or something in response to a perceived wrong. This type of behavior is not productive or healthy and can lead to further conflict and negative consequences. Rather than focusing on revenge, it is better to try to find more positive and constructive ways to deal with conflicts and to move forward in a positive direction.
Agreed
We have discussed that in this thread
Strongly agreed.
Yes, I think so as well. I think that @Eficiente is doing research for our Marvel Comics power rankings, so if any of you are willing to help him speed things up by following his instructions, you are very welcome to do so by contacting him via private messages in this forum.
Well, I think that we should remove the blatantly debunked scans as justifications from our Marvel Comics character profile pages, and likely add footnote explanations to those pages regarding why the scans are unacceptable to use, in order to avoid lots of future repetition.
I thought a better well made thread will be made later on it since this thread seems kinda like a mess to some members.
Don't new rules says transcending space time isn't 1-A? Have seen a lot of characters scaled to 1-A via using that, seems to be too vague to jump into high tiers.
He isn't beyond space-time but concepts of space and time
Oblivion doesn't scale to Chaos King. Mikaboshi, the Japanese god, is what he scales above. Chaos King got his powers by absorbing others and has nothing to do with Oblivion.
My laptop's faulty and it would be stressful to create it by mobile.
He said beyond all levels of space and time, that's 1-A. Perphaps there's a rule to that many higher dimensional beings attack lower worlds via avatars due to a rule or something or just how the franchise wants it to work to make things interesting. Aspects do not necessarily need to have most power of the true form of the being they got their powers from, they vary time to time.
His higher dimensional than the multiverse yet can't destroy it? I don't understand such logic.
What makes you think he is higher dimensional than Eternity? His feats certainly don't show him being stronger than the other abstracts. Unless of course, you just mean destroying the Multiverse without fighting the Abstracts.
