Marvel cosmology crt? First part high 1-a?

[Westcoast5005]

First of all the multiverse is transfinite starting with an aleph number of higher dimensions. Then they are more infinite series of infinite levels, infinitely greater than the others.

Another scan to back this up as they are infinite dimensions that transcends infinite dimensions countinously.

Omniverse and Infinite Dimensions
This scans shows that the infinite dimensions are stacked on top of each conceptual transcending/stretching across infinity.

To find that “All the realities are Merely Dreams, folded inside Dreams. EACH reality is A THOUGHT WITHIN A LARGER THOUGHT. Each CONTAINING SMALLER THOUGHTS WITHIN ITSELF. Ad Infinitum, Ad Nauseam”.


Eternity is stated to be transfinite and contains multiple lower forms of himself. As seen in the next scan infinity is also transfinite even are m-body/ lower forms are transfinite and represent transfinite realities.

She has an infinite amount of m-body.

As seen they are transfinite.


In this scan it's basically stated that eternity and infinity are represention of the concept of cardinality of space and time.

I you read the circled part. You would see largely inaccessible mystical. And we know that marvel reality works on cardinality. This realms are inaccessible and transfinite over lower realities.

With this I believe this part of marvel cosmology should be at least high outer.
Sources : doctor strange sorcerer supreme issue 21.
Silver surfer issue 141.
Quasar issue 37
Fantastic four 1998.

 

[Westcoast5005]

Bump

 

[Westcoast5005]

Bump

 

[LephyrTheRevanchist]

Bump

Only bump after at least 12 to 24 hours.

 

[Westcoast5005]

Ok

 

[Westcoast5005]

What will take to make this thread popular?

 

[Tarang123]

Disagree. The infinities or alephs they use just seem like a multiplication of two over and over again, which doesn’t qualify

 

[Westcoast5005]

Disagree. The infinities or alephs they use just seem like a multiplication of two over and over again, which doesn’t qualify

What implies that.

 

[Tarang123]

What implies that.

Look at the first scan. There are other statements which make this wrong interpretation of alephs consistent, so…

 

[Westcoast5005]

Look at the first scan. There are other statements which make this wrong interpretation of alephs consistent, so…

What other statement make it makes sense.

 

[Tarang123]

What other statement make it makes sense.

If a higher infinity is only two times larger, it doesn’t qualify as a higher infinity, if that makes sense

 

[Westcoast5005]

If a higher infinity is only two times larger, it doesn’t qualify as a higher infinity, if that makes sense

When did it say it's only two times larger do you even know George canto theory. Show proof.

 

[Tarang123]

When did it say it's only two times larger do you even know George canto theory. Show proof.

It literally says that in the first scan lmao. Also, the wiki functions with higher infinities having an uncountably infinite difference over lower infinities. I’m simply saying that the logic here doesn’t qualify, but if a mod accepts it, then I’ll be fine, I suppose.
Basically, this doesn’t qualify and you need to take this to a mod

 

[Westcoast5005]

It literally says that in the first scan lmao. Also, the wiki functions with higher infinities having an uncountably infinite difference over lower infinities. I’m simply saying that the logic here doesn’t qualify, but if a mod accepts it, then I’ll be fine, I suppose.
Basically, this doesn’t qualify and you need to take this to a mod

It seems you miss the part about conceptual transcends and about alephs. Not to mention it's literally infinite dimensions beyond infinite dimensions.

 

[Tarang123]

It seems you miss the part about conceptual transcends and about alephs. Not to mention it's literally infinite dimensions beyond infinite dimensions.

Doesn’t matter, if each dimension is just twice the ontological size as the lower dimension, it’s just tier 2

 

[Tarang123]

So if you want to downgrade, then there you go. Also, send the conceptual transcendence again

 

[Westcoast5005]

Seems like you don't understand what you're are saying. Am not even going to debate you I would wait for the mods.

 

[Tarang123]

Seems like you don't understand what you're are saying. Am not even going to debate you I would wait for the mods.

Wdym? I literally am pointing out flaws with what you are arguing, if you want this thing to pass, make an actual argument for it, or just give up

 

[Westcoast5005]

Like I said you didn't even understand the crt in the first place. So there's no point in debating you.

 

[Tarang123]

Like I said you didn't even understand the crt in the first place. So there's no point in debating you.

I did, tho. I was just contending the first scan. That’s literally all I was talking about

 

[Tarang123]

Also, they said a “greater than infinite” number of universes, that’s 2A. Of course, unless you can prove the nature of this hierarchy

edit: I meant, unless you can prove that they’re in a hierarchy

 

[Westcoast5005]

Universes in that case are talking about higher dimensions is it that hard to understand.

 

[Saiyan40009]

Bump

Neutralizing those of dreams seems flowery to me since something is never mentioned again if I also want to know if the higher dimensions are important

 

[Tarang123]

Universes in that case are talking about higher dimensions is it that hard to understand.

Alr, well I still somewhat disagree to some extent, but I’ll let the mods evaluate the thread

 

[Westcoast5005]

Neutralizing those of dreams seems flowery to me since something is never mentioned again if I also want to know if the higher dimensions are important

How the hell is it flowery language when silver surfer confirms that statement.

 

[Oliver_de_jesus]

This is not the same arguments that gave rise to the low 1-A?(I know some were in the original thread and are used as current justifications, but I don't remember the others)

 

[Westcoast5005]

This is not the same arguments that gave rise to the low 1-A?(I know some were in the original thread and are used as current justifications, but I don't remember the others)

It was part of it but they interpreted it wrong firstly they discounted the alephs number of dimensions being the Lowest lvl. They also completely ingnored that this is based on George cantor theory which contains transfinite cardinals which way above low 1-a etc. As they are many more.

 

[Oliver_de_jesus]

you should ask Ultima_Reality, who is someone with knowledge in this area​

 

[Westcoast5005]

you should ask Ultima_Reality, who is someone with knowledge in this area​

I asked her but she isn't here yet.

 

[Tarang123]

It was part of it but they interpreted it wrong firstly they discounted the alephs number of dimensions being the Lowest lvl. They also completely ingnored that this is based on George cantor theory which contains transfinite cardinals which way above low 1-a etc. As they are many more.

An aleph number of dimensions is only High 1B by default, but alr

 

[Tarang123]

I asked her but she isn't here yet.

Ultima is female?

 

[Westcoast5005]

Don't know the gender Ultima just sounds like a female name if am generalizing sorry for that.

 

[Westcoast5005]

An aleph number of dimensions is only High 1B by default, but alr

Doesn't change the fact that is the lowest lvl.

 

[Tarang123]

Don't know the gender Ultima just sounds like a female name if am generalizing sorry for that.

Nah, it’s cool. I was not sure either. Ultima just seems to be a play of ultimate reality or whatever

 

[Tarang123]

Doesn't change the fact that is the lowest lvl.

Doesn’t matter, it’s something already accepted in marvel’s cosmology

 

[Westcoast5005]

Doesn’t matter, it’s something already accepted in marvel’s cosmology

Yeah and I think it's wrong and should be higher that why am making revision.

 

[Westcoast5005]

Well let's not cloud the thread we should wait for the mods.

 

[Tarang123]

Yeah and I think it's wrong and should be higher that why am making revision.

How? An aleph number of dimensions without further context is High 1B at most.

 

[Westcoast5005]

How? An aleph number of dimensions without further context is High 1B at most.

You seem to miss the part where it States starting with an aleph. has it is lowest layer of transfinite multiverse. It allows follows George cantor theory which has transfinite great than aleph null.

 

[Tarang123]

You seem to miss the part where it States starting with an aleph. has it is lowest layer of transfinite multiverse. It allows follows George cantor theory which has transfinite great than aleph null.

Aleph 1 is Low 1A on the tiering system. Aleph 1 is, definitionally, larger than transfinite numbers, hence why transfinites can't reach Aleph 1 lmao, it's still only High 1B