Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s what I was trying to put into words, thank you.I also much prefer to go by explicit unambiguous self-evident actual feats rather than scaling from fights, unless it actually makes very good logical sense to do so.
I’m not proposing an axing of scaling, just as you say, they need to not be holding back - which is more akin to what I was saying that they need more evidence than the simple fact a fight takes place. Sorry if that wasn’t clear.AGAIN, PROPER POWERSCALING FOR THE HERALDS ONLY WORKS IF THEY ARE FULLY SERIOUS IN THE FIGHT AND NOT HOLDING BACK.
It was never my intention to axe powerscaling for these characters, that would be completely ridiculous. Just that these characters might be holding back to a certain tier to not kill someone, but this also does not mean we get to rate these characters massively lower than what they're shown.
TL;DR: DON'T SCALE TO THE HERALDS IF THEY'RE NOT SERIOUS, AND DEFINITELY DO NOT TRY TO TIER THEM LOWER VIA A "HOLDING BACK" KEY, WE DON'T ALLOW THAT FOR CHARACTERS THAT HAVE CONSISTENT FEATS AT THEIR NORMAL OPERATING LEVEL AT FULL POWER. THERE SHOULD BE NO MIDDLE GROUND FOR STUFF LIKE THIS. SCALE THEM TO OTHER CHARACTERS ONLY IF THEY ARE FULLY SERIOUS AND NOT HOLDING BACK.
I definitely agree. Rating Herald tiers at 6-C on Earth never made sense to me.AGAIN, PROPER POWERSCALING FOR THE HERALDS ONLY WORKS IF THEY ARE FULLY SERIOUS IN THE FIGHT AND NOT HOLDING BACK.
It was never my intention to axe powerscaling for these characters, that would be completely ridiculous. Just that these characters might be holding back to a certain tier to not kill someone, but this also does not mean we get to rate these characters massively lower than what they're shown.
TL;DR: DON'T SCALE TO THE HERALDS IF THEY'RE NOT SERIOUS, AND DEFINITELY DO NOT TRY TO TIER THEM LOWER VIA A "HOLDING BACK" KEY, WE DON'T ALLOW THAT FOR CHARACTERS THAT HAVE CONSISTENT FEATS AT THEIR NORMAL OPERATING LEVEL AT FULL POWER. THERE SHOULD BE NO MIDDLE GROUND FOR STUFF LIKE THIS. SCALE THEM TO OTHER CHARACTERS ONLY IF THEY ARE FULLY SERIOUS AND NOT HOLDING BACK.
They don’t shake all levels of reality, their clash is just stated to ripple across all levels of reality, which is more range than AP. And even if it was AP, that would be a 2-A statement, not Low 2-C or 2-C.Two thors shake all levels of reality | Thor (1991) #438
Oh, alright then, I definitely agree. The fights should be fully analyzed and all signs should be checked out.I’m not proposing an axing of scaling, just as you say, they need to not be holding back - which is more akin to what I was saying that they need more evidence than the simple fact a fight takes place. Sorry if that wasn’t clear.
Of course, but it would have to be thoroughly analyzed before we just come to a conclusion willy nilly.and an all out fight should be considered “logical scaling” or at the very least a feat to be considered. Obviously fighting characters who are holding back leads to unquantifiable scaling anyway and shouldn’t be used at all.
Hulk destroys a Universe | Defenders (1972) #1
This is the same feat, not two separate ones.Hulk rips night crawlers Universe casually | The incredible Hulk Vol 1 #126
100% agree.Oh, alright then, I definitely agree. The fights should be fully analyzed and all signs should be checked out.
Of course, but it would have to be thoroughly analyzed before we just come to a conclusion willy nilly.
They don’t shake all levels of reality, their clash is just stated to ripple across all levels of reality, which is more range than AP. And even if it was AP, that would be a 2-A statement, not Low 2-C or 2-C.
The Big Bang statement in that scan is better for AP.
I didn't even notice the Big Bang bit. Nice.
Hmm sureThey don’t shake all levels of reality, their clash is just stated to ripple across all levels of reality, which is more range than AP. And even if it was AP, that would be a 2-A statement, not Low 2-C or 2-C.
The Big Bang statement in that scan is better for AP.
I am actually confused, i could swear they were different feats.This is the same feat, not two separate ones.
Thats around 6 Low 2-C - 2-C feats
- Hulk channels the power of 2 Universes | Heroes Reborn: The Return #4
- Hyperion tanking the destruction of 2 Universes | Avengers (2013) #4
- Hulk destroys a Universe | Defenders (1972) #1
- Silver Surfer preserves two universes | Green lantern/Silver surfer: Unholy alliances
- Two thors shake all levels of reality | Thor (1991) #438
- Hulk rips night crawlers Universe casually | The incredible Hulk Vol 1 #126
Oh, I forgot to mention, we don’t use crossover comics like this one for scaling. Not to mention that if you read the dialogue, Surfer makes it pretty clear that he’s not at his normal level of strength, and he thinks he’d have to sacrifice his life to preserve the universes.Silver Surfer preserves two universes | Green lantern/Silver surfer: Unholy alliances
1. Damaged Galactus (The Mighty thor (2011) #4)
2. Harmed Odin. (Fear Itself (2011) #1)
3. Rent the heavens asunder in his battle. against the Odin Destroyer and held his own. (Thor: Man of War)
4. Harmed Glory by summoning the winds of a thousand worlds. (And we should find out how strong Glory is) (idk)
5. Harmed Skyfather Hercules. (Chaos war #1)
6. Fought against Surtur. (Idk)
7. Briefly knocked out Mangog. (Thunderstrike (2011) #5)
8. Briefly knocked out the Phoenix Force, though far weaker than it (Avengers Vs X-men #4)
I mean, it is within his range.Oh, I forgot to mention, we don’t use crossover comics like this one for scaling. Not to mention that if you read the dialogue, Surfer makes it pretty clear that he’s not at his normal level of strength, and he thinks he’d have to sacrifice his life to preserve the universes.
Well, @Kenshin_ did the job for this already@MARVEL_Future_Fight_Gamer
Can you find sources for these:
1. Damaged Galactus.
2. Harmed Odin.
3. Rent the heavens asunder in his battle against the Odin Destroyer and held his own.
4. Harmed Glory by summoning the winds of a thousand worlds. (And we should find out how strong Glory is)
5. Harmed Skyfather Hercules.
6. Fought against Surtur.
7. Briefly knocked out Mangog.
8. Briefly knocked out the Phoenix Force, though far weaker than it
I can agree to thisHonestly, I can see Thor going up to ranging between 2-C and 2-A at his absolute, absolute peak (excluding stuff like God-Blast and Odinforce of course).
Yeah that's what I meantAll direct feats I think, no scaling to 2-C characters yet
Agreed; they get a varies only if the power has an in universe mechanismI am of the personal opinion that ABSOLUTELY NO ONE SHOULD SCALE TO THOR, HULK, NORRIN, SENTRY AND OTHER TOP-TIER HERALDS UNLESS THEY'RE SERIOUS AND NO LONGER HOLDING BACK, PERIOD. Even for the Tier 3 shit. I just think the whole "X tier when holding back" is garbage, just scale those lower rung people to their own feats people. Not that hard. I am willing to die on that hill with this belief.
Channels power from two universes, not enough power to destroy them, as far as I understood.
- Hulk channels the power of 2 Universes | Heroes Reborn: The Return #4
Possibly, but all that he really did was preventing two planets from colliding with each other, and he only withstood an extremely small part of the resulting explosion.
- Hyperion tanking the destruction of 2 Universes | Avengers (2013) #4
Not a part of regular continuity.
- Silver Surfer preserves two universes | Green lantern/Silver surfer: Unholy alliances
Tom DeFalco used to be the king of hyperbolic flowery language though.
- Two thors shake all levels of reality | Thor (1991) #438
I think that Impress said that it was a tiny pocket universe.
- Hulk rips night crawlers Universe casually | The incredible Hulk Vol 1 #126
Not quantifiable, especially as he just absorbs power from the endless cosmos, and this is what seems to be referred to here.
- Silver Surfer #4 (1968): Silver Surfer has the power of the endless cosmos
Unproven hyperbolic flowery language I'm afraid.
- The Incredible Hulk #95 (2000): Silver Surfer states that "all the power of the cosmos" flows through him
It was a galaxy-destroying explosion, and it was made clear that authors, not scientists, might one day describe it as comparable to a big bang, again via flowery language to spice up their stories.
- Thor tanked an explosion that rivalled the Big Bang and destroyed the entire Black Galaxy, which is a universe made of biological matter / bioverse (this one is already on his profile, but it being only 4-A never sat well with me)
I will see what people have to say about it.Channels power from two universes, not enough power to destroy them, as far as I understood.
He survived the “cascading energy” that collapsed two universes.Possibly, but all that he really did was preventing two planets from colliding with each other, and he only withstood an extremely small part of the resulting explosion.
The shockwave affected the entire cosmos, and the energy released by them erupted through all planes of reality i dont think DeFlaco intended this feat to be hyperboleTom DeFalco used to be the king of hyperbolic flowery language though.
I am not sure why it would be though?I think that Impress said that it was a tiny pocket universe.
The worst thing about this is that we also assume these Heralds also hold back on their durability, even tho logically and realistically speaking, that's impossible if you actually don't have a proper "Varies" mechanism explaining this fluctuation, like Superman's mental state or Hulk's anger or even Sentry's mental state. THERE IS NO OTHER EXPLANATION FOR OTHER TOP TIER HERALD PEOPLE FOR THIS.I am of the personal opinion that ABSOLUTELY NO ONE SHOULD SCALE TO THOR, HULK, NORRIN, SENTRY AND OTHER TOP-TIER HERALDS UNLESS THEY'RE SERIOUS AND NO LONGER HOLDING BACK, PERIOD. Even for the Tier 3 shit. I just think the whole "X tier when holding back" is garbage, just scale those lower rung people to their own feats people. Not that hard. I am willing to die on that hill with this belief.
Withstanding only part of a 2-C explosion is still 2-C from my knowledge. Afaik Inverse-square law isn’t applicable to Tier 2 destructionPossibly, but all that he really did was preventing two planets from colliding with each other, and he only withstood an extremely small part of the resulting explosion.
Was it ever explicitly stated to be the actual size of an entire universe?For the Black Galaxy one, does it matter if the "Big Bang" comparison is flowery language if the Black Galaxy itself is actually a universe?
Correct. Inverse-square law stops applying once you enter the realm of High 3-A. Infinity divided by anything is still infinity.Withstanding only part of a 2-C explosion is still 2-C from my knowledge. Afaik Inverse-square law isn’t applicable to Tier 2 destruction
Okay.I will see what people have to say about it.
I am not so sure that the feat was intended that way.He survived the “cascading energy” that collapsed two universes.
I believe the planets colliding was similar to an incursion
I think the feat is still 2-C, the fact that two universes were erased by this energy with only hyperion remaining implies (if not straight up shows) comparability.
If it had been the local universe alone, I agree, but DeFalco made it sound like a Low 1-A feat, which is far too high.The shockwave affected the entire cosmos, and the energy released by them erupted through all planes of reality i dont think DeFlaco intended this feat to be hyperbole
I believe a hyperbole would also be a lot less specific like most of DeFlacos blatent hyperboles.
Well, I don't remember so well, but the Dark-Crawler was definitely not presented as remotely capable of withstanding universal scale attacks in other stories, and the realm itself was never explicitly depicted or stated to be be of universal size.I am not sure why it would be though?
It is stated to be a dimension, a cosmos, a universe and is treated as a dimension like hulks world
Which doesnt inherently mean its universe sized, but to assume otherwise would be the more far assumption then just saying its universe sized
Unless there is something i dont know.
I am not so sure that it was an explosion rather than a spread out erasure, but point taken.Withstanding only part of a 2-C explosion is still 2-C from my knowledge. Afaik Inverse-square law isn’t applicable to Tier 2 destruction