Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't recall saying that.I'm pretty sure it as you can ask firestorm when I tried to use the 60 trillion light years in half a second big bang he said if the writers are different I should stick with 93 billion light years as writers tend to ignore stuffs like that and other reasons for consistency.
Gawd damn, now its starting to look like a light novel file lolHigh 6-C when holding back, 4-A to High 3-A at peak, higher with thermo blast, up to 2-C, possibly 2-A with the God Blast
BadNot sure about you lot, but I like it
I'm presuming everyone who's 4-B becomes 4-ASo is the 4-A rating going to be accepted then, and if so who will scale to it?
I mean... thought>>>light so still pretty good.A trillion thought-year sounds extremely underwhelming though
...are they?I mean... thought>>>light so still pretty good.
It should but I think we're deciding on which universe size to use. Personally I'm in favour of the High 3-A end if what Confluctor says is true, but I don't care either way.Why is it "4-A to High 3-A at peak"? Shouldn't it be one or the other?
Here when I asked.I don't recall saying that.
Nah I agree with 4A heraldsWait I thought you were talking about the "Holding back" and "Peak" parts.
It should be infinite Ă—+-Ă· whatever is still infinite.Are there other things that support Heralds being universal? Because honestly, I'm not sure that shaking a possibly infinite universe is enough.
Splitting cosmology by writers I don't remember it being only to outer or teir 1 characters from what I know as it's a general something.no. I made that thread, I know what I wrote. I didn't write that. Prove me where I said it extends to universal tier.
I remember it stated as splitting the Marvel and DC cosmology via writers not just teir 1 characters.Not when you're saying shit like "oh this is what the accepted standard is" and using that to quell debates. It's misinformation
Not all writers agree with infinite universe wtf and the universe ain't even infinite to begin with. Plus we see pathetic statements of infinite universe then later we see it stated to have a middle or an end.That seems like a firestorm problem to me. But that shouldn't be. Just because a writer doesn't go out of his way in every issue to mention the universe is infinite in size is... Stupid. The universe is infinite, and that's practically something every writer agrees with.
Anyway, can we leave this discussion behind already? The universe is infinite, and we have at least 1 trillion statement. Don't like it? Take it up to marvel.
Our universe isn't infinite in the first place and it doesn't matter if I don't read marvel books as I can give my input like any other person. If it annoys you deal with it.Mate, can you show me at least 5 different instances where the author doesn't agree with infinite universe. You can't because you don't even read marvel to begin with.
I'm giving my input and stop saying stonewalling lmao as if I'm ignoring what you guys I've been saying and what do I need to backup? I'm just giving my input and that's all if you don't wanna reply then you can simply ignore them.Your next post is immediately getting deleted. You keep stonewalling the whole thing and repeating the exact same point without backing it up. If you can come with scans next time, sure. Otherwise, just don't.
Then Calc Surfer's Black Hole Feat Right NowI disagree with High 3-A, even if there's a lot of them there is basically just one kind of High 3-A feat and that doesn't sit right with me.
I don't see any posting from me on your wall.
Our universe isn't infinite in the first place and it doesn't matter if I don't read marvel books as I can give my input like any other person. If it annoys you deal with it.
Now to rip that DC debunk blog to shreds
The whole “debunking all Uni and above herald feats”The world of Marvel is not our universe. This point is moot, Heralds would've already been High 3-A if this wiki didn't have the need to illogically lowball verses at random. The evidence is clear, if there are multiple statements of the universe being infinite, then there's no reason to doubt it is, unless there are explicit contradictions within the narrative
What DC debunk are you referring to?
Firestorm808I don't see any posting from me on your wall.
I've been saying this from the beginning.The world of Marvel is not our universe. This point is moot, Heralds would've already been High 3-A if this wiki didn't have the need to illogically lowball verses at random. The evidence is clear, if there are multiple statements of the universe being infinite, then there's no reason to doubt it is, unless there are explicit contradictions within the narrative
I'd drop it now so this thread can be concluded or when you guys create the High 3A thread.There is a difference between this universe and a fictional universe, which has consistently been confirmed to be infinite in size... nobody gives a shit about real world standards when the verse has its own fictional standards for shit.
Seriously, can you guys just ******* drop this already. It keeps going in circles.
Yeah. All I said was that it depends. I didn't say anything about going one way over the other.
Yeah it depends on the writers that's what I've been saying above given examples like the question I asked you but anyways I leave that for another time.Yeah. All I said was that it depends. I didn't say anything about going one way over the other.