- 20,541
- 17,454
Because even if taken at face value and ignoring every onscreen visual issue, it would be an outlier for everyone involved and makes every subsequent event in every film questionable.Why was it rejected?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because even if taken at face value and ignoring every onscreen visual issue, it would be an outlier for everyone involved and makes every subsequent event in every film questionable.Why was it rejected?
how does it make it questionble? when has thor gained on using black hole creation that can suck in stars when it would destroy earth in procces.Because even if taken at face value and ignoring every onscreen visual issue, it would be an outlier for everyone involved and makes every subsequent event in every film questionable.
Ive explained how this isn't questionable as he haven't gotten a use for it and being a outlier dosen't sense as The Bifrost uses a powerful, rainbow-like energy drawn/ from the center of Asgard to create wormhole-like portals that can instantaneously transport people and objects between realms, over millions of light-years of distance. This means that it can be used to create wormholes that can suck in stars like it did in thor aswell and stormbreaker controls it meaning thor can control star sucking power at very leastBecause even if taken at face value and ignoring every onscreen visual issue, it would be an outlier for everyone involved and makes every subsequent event in every film questionable.