- 793
- 367
- Thread starter
- #161
You literally explained why they would have stronger bloodlust than normal humans just to conclude that it's regular bloodlust? What? Like I am genuily not getting your train of thought
Thats not what i said at all. I said that humans in the great war wouldnt have bloodlust in the sense of killing everyone for sadistic purposes. And argued against frisk surpassing ANY human bloodlust capability or having it in some supernatural sense at least early in the route.
The definition of regular bloodlust is "uncontrollable desire to kill or maim others.". Great war humans mostly wouldnt have that. Genocide frisk did.
Thats not what i said at all. I said that humans in the great war wouldnt have bloodlust in the sense of killing everyone for sadistic purposes. And argued against frisk surpassing ANY human bloodlust capability or having it in some supernatural sense at least early in the route.
The definition of regular bloodlust is "uncontrollable desire to kill or maim others.". Great war humans mostly wouldnt have that. Genocide frisk did.