• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Well, I'm not going to remove those MU myself. Remove them also means removing them from the other profiles, not just the Kirby characters.

It seems clear after months that nobody cares to do that job, so I disagree, and doubt the care put into prioritizing that. You need to link the thread that causes the change in the summary when editing a profile.
I would remove the obsolete vs threads myself, except until these revisions are instituted, we won't know for which which matches need to be removed.

The accuracy of a profile comes before one or 2 obsolete debates.

So stop holding up the revisions.
 
I would remove the obsolete vs threads myself, except until these revisions are instituted, we won't know for which which matches need to be removed.
Good enough then, I never did hear anything like this before. I will apply the revisions all over this week.
Still easier doing those at once. Removing all of them on the Kirby profiles brings it down to like half of the MU’s necessary to remove. Just wait a little, matchups aren’t a 110% priority here

Tbf you are simply just asking to a wide audience like “hey anyone who views this thread, remove these matchups” without actually being clear cut. Like the profiles aren’t even open in the first place. You need to dedicate time to when the profiles are actually all open so you can take it down in all one fell swoop and not waste time doing it at separate times.
I would think all of them or most need to be removed, but somebody made some list of MU that he thought should stay in a way that I can't keep up with nor remember.

You say that as if people couldn't talk to each other and get organized. All the profiles are open, minus Kirby's for some reason, we can change that at any time.
 
Good enough then, I never did hear anything like this before. I will apply the revisions all over this week.

I would think all of them or most need to be removed, but somebody made some list of MU that he thought should stay in a way that I can't keep up with nor remember.

You say that as if people couldn't talk to each other and get organized. All the profiles are open, minus Kirby's for some reason, we can change that at any time.
Fair enough

Me who only checked Kirby’s profile: 🦧
 
Have we all agreed on what Kirby's first key will look like?

Which 5-A feats (if any) does he still scale too?
 
Have we all agreed on what Kirby's first key will look like?

Which 5-A feats (if any) does he still scale too?
The Nova one. Even if me and Clover can’t agree to Zero’s KE, it really doesn’t matter since we agree to Nova’s and Zero scales to it
 
I put very clear how Nova blew up on its own, find the arguments, I looked better into it and it was even more solid than what I remembered.

Also, even if it had been Kirby (it wasn't), that's not one-shotting at all.
 
I put very clear how Nova blew up on its own, find the arguments, I looked better into it and it was even more solid than what I remembered.

Also, even if it had been Kirby (it wasn't), that's not one-shotting at all.
Yea your arguments were it’s broken core makes it weaker. I don’t see how this weakens the overall machine. It still has its durability no matter how you weaken it

What makes you think it wasn’t Kirby. The direct throw Kirby made hit Nova and caused the explosion. Unless you have some other explanation, I don’t understand your point
 
Look the other things I said about it.
Your previous statement is incredibly unlikely. I find it unreasonable for it to suddenly explode due to damage. Marx was directly thrown in the moment and when he got close enough for impact it exploded. I really don’t understand what this would be ignored for. Another thing, whenever Nova regenerates upon a second summoning, he still pertains the same damage from before. If it were from damage, Nova would do it again after its resummon. But he doesn’t.
 
Yea your arguments were it’s broken core makes it weaker. I don’t see how this weakens the overall machine. It still has its durability no matter how you weaken it
"The part of Nova that was damaged was its nucleus, it makes perfect sense that any amount of extra damage after that would trigger it to blow up. Star Dream blows up due to being a machine that can, on its own, blow up within a given context of it getting enough damage internally, Nova is the same."

It wasn't necessarily weaker, its machinery was unstable while being able to blow up with enough damage to an unqualifiable degree, so Kirby throw Marx there and it blows up. A machine being able to blow up when unstable doesn't get any level of durability before it blows up, you can move it a bit and that maybe causes something that triggers what's needed to blow up.
What makes you think it wasn’t Kirby. The direct throw Kirby made hit Nova and caused the explosion. Unless you have some other explanation, I don’t understand your point
(Same comment) "Well, Kirby aimed to attack the nucleus, destroyed the "heart", many mini explosions happened on its own after that, followed by a bigger explosion that did not happen due to Kirby having attacked that last pillar too hard, and later Marx is sent at one side of Nova while white blasts before the explosion come from the very center of Nova, then it blows up. The same white blasts also came out of Nova before its brain pretty much blew up."

The final explosion was the same type as the explosion Nova's internal machines are proven to be able to do on its own. This is huge evidence.

It makes no sense for Kirby to be able to "one-shot" Nova as you said, Kirby aimed to attack the nucleus rather than to face Nova himself, it took him a while to reach the nucleus, it took him a while to destroy it, and then he blows up the whole machine? That's like spending 5 minutes beating up someone's brains via intangibility, then having the target defeated in the ground, then punching them again once and the whole being blows up.
I find it unreasonable for it to suddenly explode due to damage.
Nonsense. What makes it unlike the other explosions it had due to damage and Star Dream blowing up due to damage?
Marx was directly thrown in the moment and when he got close enough for impact it exploded.
Yes.
I really don’t understand what this would be ignored for.
It isn't ignored, Marx collided into Nova and so Nova blew up, but you're thinking this as if it had binary results. It's like people reasoning that the sun from Super Mario Bros. 3 has to be the size of the real life sun because they see many statements of it being called "the sun".
Another thing, whenever Nova regenerates upon a second summoning, he still pertains the same damage from before. If it were from damage, Nova would do it again after its resummon. But he doesn’t.
What it "would do it again"? This is some made up rule. If damage to its nucleus didn't stop it, it would have still do what it was going to do to Popstar and stopping it was pointless. It makes perfect sense to keep damage from the nucleus, of all things, but be able to heal the rest. Either it got better in its nucleus & "scarred" or it didn't get any better than how it was before blowing up when healing.
 
Bro what is this, an action movie? Machines don’t explode like that. Say like a car for example. It doesn’t explode naturally via damage, it requires an outside force, like fire reacting to gas or a bomb. The throw fits with this example. Especially if it’s caused by direct collision with Nova. The collision caused this reaction, and the machine’s durability doesn’t change. Star Dream’s example is more than likely cinematic time. The process to the explosion is slow and just eye candy for those who are exhausted after 5 bosses back to back. Nova explodes the same way but there is no delay at all. It just immediately does as soon as Marx gets flung into Nova.
It wasn't necessarily weaker, its machinery was unstable while being able to blow up with enough damage to an unqualifiable degree, so Kirby throw Marx there and it blows up. A machine being able to blow up when unstable doesn't get any level of durability before it blows up, you can move it a bit and that maybe causes something that triggers what's needed to blow up.
Same with the car example. If you hit a damaged car that has its engine busted, it doesn’t blow up. Its durability has no reason to change either unless it has major exterior damage that weakened the material. It doesn’t matter what part Kirby hits because it still blew up the rest of the undamaged machine.


(Same comment) "Well, Kirby aimed to attack the nucleus, destroyed the "heart", many mini explosions happened on its own after that, followed by a bigger explosion that did not happen due to Kirby having attacked that last pillar too hard, and later Marx is sent at one side of Nova while white blasts before the explosion come from the very center of Nova, then it blows up. The same white blasts also came out of Nova before its brain pretty much blew up."

The final explosion was the same type as the explosion Nova's internal machines are proven to be able to do on its own. This is huge evidence.

It makes no sense for Kirby to be able to "one-shot" Nova as you said, Kirby aimed to attack the nucleus rather than to face Nova himself, it took him a while to reach the nucleus, it took him a while to destroy it, and then he blows up the whole machine? That's like spending 5 minutes beating up someone's brains via intangibility, then having the target defeated in the ground, then punching them again once and the whole being blows up.
What does Kirby hitting the pillar have to do with it blowing up on its own? In fact, why would it blow up on its own? There’s literally no other reason it could’ve blown up. It’s defense system is destroyed so the nucleus just suicides? Doesn’t make sense. Given how there are many white blasts as you say, it’s probably a chain explosion caused by Kirby destroying the pillar. Literally what are you talking about, white blasts came after the Nova explosion, not before. The core explosion already had its final burst when that part of Nova’s exterior blasted off.

Nothing proves it did it on its own. All it said was Kirby was attacking the core. That supports the argument that Kirby caused it, not by itself, which really has no evidence supporting it aside from a couple of statements by you, which don’t really hold any ground. Random statements like it exploded on its own, or the core caused Nova to blow, need way more evidence than what you provide, which the game itself disproves.

It does though. Kirby only destroyed part of the inside of Nova, while the rest of the machine with 5-A durability remains unaffected. Kirby essentially one-shotted the outside, which remains unaffected by whatever happened to the core. It taking a while to reach doesn’t matter. It had to pass through while being actively attacked. The core is guarded by a force field, which requires Kirby to attack the defensive system, which ended up exploding anyways. It’s a very simple explanation. That’s essentially my point here. Nova itself is still alive though, just halted via core damage.

Nonsense. What makes it unlike the other explosions it had due to damage and Star Dream blowing up due to damage?

Yes.

It isn't ignored, Marx collided into Nova and so Nova blew up, but you're thinking this as if it had binary results. It's like people reasoning that the sun from Super Mario Bros. 3 has to be the size of the real life sun because they see many statements of it being called "the sun".
You are separating out the same point into 3 different points and treating them like they are individual. Star Dream’s was a cinematic delay, it directly blew up from being drilled in half. Also keep in mind The Access Arc and the Nova in Kirby’s galaxy are 2 different similarly built machines. The insides are different. This comparison doesn’t make sense. The sun has to deal with something completely different. Nova being blown up by Marx getting thrown is a very simple and usable argument. Nova blowing up by being weakened is a flawed argument already explained above.

What it "would do it again"? This is some made up rule. If damage to its nucleus didn't stop it, it would have still do what it was going to do to Popstar and stopping it was pointless. It makes perfect sense to keep damage from the nucleus, of all things, but be able to heal the rest. Either it got better in its nucleus & "scarred" or it didn't get any better than how it was before blowing up when healing.
Referring to the wrong thing. I mean it as it would blow up again if it were from damage. It still pertains all of the previous damage despite being regenerated. Yet it’s still capable of operating despite it. The whole reason it was halted was that its jets broke. I’m going to bring up the car example again. Let’s compare the core to a car engine. Once it blows up, it can’t move, as that’s the engine’s purpose. Nova is sentient though, so it can still operate via other means despite said damage. It just lost access to its jets. The core in Nova operates differently than the Access Ark’s, because when that one is destroyed, the Nova flat out dies. Galactic Nova doesn’t rely that much on its core, so it can’t be that the explosion was caused on its own if the damage from there caused the Nova’s destruction.
 
Bro what is this, an action movie?
This are unbelievable double standards and you're not even aware of them, there is nothing that makes it happen in an action movie and doesn't make it happen in an action kid's game.
Machines don’t explode like that. Say like a car for example. It doesn’t explode naturally via damage, it requires an outside force, like fire reacting to gas or a bomb. The throw fits with this example. Especially if it’s caused by direct collision with Nova. The collision caused this reaction, and the machine’s durability doesn’t change.
Same with the car example. If you hit a damaged car that has its engine busted, it doesn’t blow up. Its durability has no reason to change either unless it has major exterior damage that weakened the material. It doesn’t matter what part Kirby hits because it still blew up the rest of the undamaged machine.
I’m going to bring up the car example again. Let’s compare the core to a car engine. Once it blows up, it can’t move, as that’s the engine’s purpose.
It doesn't matter as this machine is proven to explode with damage as shown when you destroy the core and many mini explosions happen on its own, followed by a bigger explosion. "A car for example" doesn't have this at all, nor any other machine.
Star Dream’s example is more than likely cinematic time. The process to the explosion is slow and just eye candy for those who are exhausted after 5 bosses back to back. Nova explodes the same way but there is no delay at all. It just immediately does as soon as Marx gets flung into Nova.
You have no reason to conclude that because your inner logic about it is that it shouldn't happen and yet it did happen, you don't qualify it in any valid way.
What does Kirby hitting the pillar have to do with it blowing up on its own? In fact, why would it blow up on its own? There’s literally no other reason it could’ve blown up. It’s defense system is destroyed so the nucleus just suicides? Doesn’t make sense.
Its machinery is made in a way that what happened makes sense, you can't dismiss it as not making sense or that the nucleus suicided, you are even aware that in fiction machines can blow up via stupid reasons like that and this is an alien machine with unknown properties.

What you say makes as much sense as trying to dismiss all the explosions because they happened in space, which has no air.
Given how there are many white blasts as you say, it’s probably a chain explosion caused by Kirby destroying the pillar.
Everything follows cause and consequence, I don't think this means what you think it means.
Literally what are you talking about, white blasts came after the Nova explosion, not before. The core explosion already had its final burst when that part of Nova’s exterior blasted off.
You are literally wrong, white blasts came before the core blew up and white blasts came before Nova itself blew up. The latter white blasts come from the center of Nova, whereas Marx was thrown in the center of that hole Nova had on top of its face.

More to it, seeing the feat again I noticed that when Nova blew up there were mini explosion on top of the big & more notable explosion, those being parts of Nova that survived and were blowing up on their own.
Nothing proves it did it on its own. All it said was Kirby was attacking the core. That supports the argument that Kirby caused it, not by itself, which really has no evidence supporting it aside from a couple of statements by you, which don’t really hold any ground. Random statements like it exploded on its own, or the core caused Nova to blow, need way more evidence than what you provide, which the game itself disproves.
It should have all been too intuitive the first time I pointed things out, you didn't keep up. Kirby can't cause many mini explosions and later a bigger explosion by destroying something, Kirby can destroy something that something blows up naturally by the sheer force of Kirby's last attack. This is Nova being made in a way that allows itself to blow up like that, which cannot be attributed to Kirby.
It does though. Kirby only destroyed part of the inside of Nova, while the rest of the machine with 5-A durability remains unaffected. Kirby essentially one-shotted the outside, which remains unaffected by whatever happened to the core. It taking a while to reach doesn’t matter. It had to pass through while being actively attacked. The core is guarded by a force field, which requires Kirby to attack the defensive system, which ended up exploding anyways. It’s a very simple explanation. That’s essentially my point here. Nova itself is still alive though, just halted via core damage.
If Kirby could "one-shot" Nova as he did he could have destroyed both "the rest of the machine with 5-A durability" & the defensive system at once in 1 or 2 attacks since he can blow up all of Nova's body by your logic.
Referring to the wrong thing. I mean it as it would blow up again if it were from damage. It still pertains all of the previous damage despite being regenerated. Yet it’s still capable of operating despite it. The whole reason it was halted was that its jets broke.
It wouldn't blow up again because it healed from the damage. It partially pertains the previous damage, if it were to keep "all" the previous damage it wouldn't have regenerated, its parts would still be separated and floating in space without gathering and repairing themselves.
The core in Nova operates differently than the Access Ark’s, because when that one is destroyed, the Nova flat out dies. Galactic Nova doesn’t rely that much on its core, so it can’t be that the explosion was caused on its own if the damage from there caused the Nova’s destruction.
You can have 2 characters with Mid-High regen and have 1 not die from damage in its core & blowing up and the other die from getting defeated in battle 3 times, being ripped in half and then blowing up.
 
This are unbelievable double standards and you're not even aware of them, there is nothing that makes it happen in an action movie and doesn't make it happen in an action kid's game.



It doesn't matter as this machine is proven to explode with damage as shown when you destroy the core and many mini explosions happen on its own, followed by a bigger explosion. "A car for example" doesn't have this at all, nor any other machine.

You have no reason to conclude that because your inner logic about it is that it shouldn't happen and yet it did happen, you don't qualify it in any valid way.

Its machinery is made in a way that what happened makes sense, you can't dismiss it as not making sense or that the nucleus suicided, you are even aware that in fiction machines can blow up via stupid reasons like that and this is an alien machine with unknown properties.

What you say makes as much sense as trying to dismiss all the explosions because they happened in space, which has no air.

Everything follows cause and consequence, I don't think this means what you think it means.

You are literally wrong, white blasts came before the core blew up and white blasts came before Nova itself blew up. The latter white blasts come from the center of Nova, whereas Marx was thrown in the center of that hole Nova had on top of its face.

More to it, seeing the feat again I noticed that when Nova blew up there were mini explosion on top of the big & more notable explosion, those being parts of Nova that survived and were blowing up on their own.

It should have all been too intuitive the first time I pointed things out, you didn't keep up. Kirby can't cause many mini explosions and later a bigger explosion by destroying something, Kirby can destroy something that something blows up naturally by the sheer force of Kirby's last attack. This is Nova being made in a way that allows itself to blow up like that, which cannot be attributed to Kirby.

If Kirby could "one-shot" Nova as he did he could have destroyed both "the rest of the machine with 5-A durability" & the defensive system at once in 1 or 2 attacks since he can blow up all of Nova's body by your logic.

It wouldn't blow up again because it healed from the damage. It partially pertains the previous damage, if it were to keep "all" the previous damage it wouldn't have regenerated, its parts would still be separated and floating in space without gathering and repairing themselves.

You can have 2 characters with Mid-High regen and have 1 not die from damage in its core & blowing up and the other die from getting defeated in battle 3 times, being ripped in half and then blowing up.
Here I’ll say this a bit differently to try and clear things up, fix some of my realized incorrect arguments, and prevent this from escalating. You should also probably explain each of your points because it would clear up my own confusion and we can go on from there.


Nova’s Core Destruction:

So with Nova’s core destruction, Kirby destroyed the pillars, which caused the core and the general area to blow up as a reaction to the destruction of them. Nova’s core self-destructing doesn’t make as much sense, if I interpret your point correctly, correct me if I’m wrong. There is no argument behind it. It had to have had a cause and it’s more than likely a general reaction rather than simply blowing up.

Nova’s Actual Explosion:

Nova’s explosion is caused by a direct throw by Kirby. Marx making contact destroyed Nova. Said collision caused the main explosion, which then generated mini chain explosions, which as you state, destroyed the rest of the machine. Now here’s the 2 main calcs that have caused some arguments about this. The 5-A Nova KE calc, and Nova’s Low 5-B death calc. The main reason why I think the 5-A should be applied is that the death explosion still destroyed Nova, despite that Nova can withstand its own recoil against the Sun and Moon and fight against said force. This would give Nova 5-A durability. The explosion still destroyed Nova and incapacitated Marx, but still survived and remained intact.


Meta Knightmare Nova Regeneration:

Main argument here was that it pertained its damage done from its core explosion, which you say is the cause of the Nova’s explosion. Point being, if it was caused by the core damage, Nova still retains it, meaning it could explode again. I realize this point is pretty faulty and irrelevant.

Star Dream:

Star Dream’s explosion is an entirely different explosion with a different cause and reaction. It should be irrelevant here as that’s not what we’re talking about.


That original thing was a pretty big wormhole going nowhere so lets try to regroup our points and decide from here without getting anymore confusion and escalation. Once we get through this, revisions can be applied. I’ll consider the multi-stellar removal for a different time. This thread has gone on for too long
 
The main reason why I think the 5-A should be applied is that the death explosion still destroyed Nova, despite that Nova can withstand its own recoil against the Sun and Moon and fight against said force. This would give Nova 5-A durability. The explosion still destroyed Nova and incapacitated Marx, but still survived and remained intact.
What do you think of this, @CloverDragon03 ? Again, math's not my area, is Marx's tiny body taking this the same as Nova's planet-sized body moving and being 5-A due to it?

If so, I guess Kirby taking a part of the explosion of the nucleus the same, as it blew away parts from Nova's surface?
 
Nova's durability is 5-A because it can withstand the recoil of its own kinetic energy (as shown from it being able to slam into the Sun and Moon without any consequence to itself). The nucleus explosion and the Marx explosion would scale because although they were blasts from the inside, it's notable that they actually destroyed parts of Nova's body.

So yes, those explosions would be 5-A
 
Because Kirby was the one who knocked Marx into Nova and caused the explosion in the first place. Also Kirby has dura for it because Kirby survived the earlier core explosion.
 
I think there may be a way here. You know how Nova was able to slam into the sun and moon with its KE and then have a fight with them? Well its defence scales then. Additionally Marx Soul absorbed all of Novas power so he should be at the very least comparable
 
Then Kirby doesn't scale to the 5-A since he doesn't scale to Nova's durability
You are confused. Kirby didn't blow up Nova himself by the sheer force of throwing Marx there, sure. But Kirby took a part of the explosion of its core while being inside Nova, whereas parts of Nova's surface (much far away from there) got destroyed by it, and Marx's body still took the explosion of Nova's body that destroyed most of it. The latter 2 feats are 5-A in durability as I had confirmed here, so I'm making the edits right now.
 
You are confused. Kirby didn't blow up Nova himself by the sheer force of throwing Marx there, sure. But Kirby took a part of the explosion of its core while being inside Nova, whereas parts of Nova's surface (much far away from there) got destroyed by it, and Marx's body still took the explosion of Nova's body that destroyed most of it. The latter 2 feats are 5-A in durability as I had confirmed here, so I'm making the edits right now.
Nova still could hit the sun and the moon at full speed, suggesting it being capable of living its own KE, thus Kirby damaging it enough for the explosion to happen inside of it should at the very least scale him to it
 
Nova still could hit the sun and the moon at full speed, suggesting it being capable of living its own KE, thus Kirby damaging it enough for the explosion to happen inside of it should at the very least scale him to it
Exactly. Kirby caused the initial explosion. Marx survived it, Nova has 5-A dura. So yea
 
Back
Top