- 11,361
- 17,707
I commented on the blog itself
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Kirby revisions: Everything coming full circle
- Thread starter Eficiente
- Start date
- 17,426
- 11,784
@Eficiente Just curious what is Kirby's fastest speed feat/calc?
Are there any in the quadrillions c or quintillions c or highet?
Are there any in the quadrillions c or quintillions c or highet?
- 15,655
- 10,628
i just re-made two of Efi's calcs with updated scientific info and the highest end i got from all of it is 478 trillion x light speed.
- 11,361
- 17,707
I added a new end to the Nightmare moon calc using the calculated moon size. The result is High 6-A for the crater and Low 5-B for the explosion
- 15,429
- 5,016
- Thread starter
- #88
Oh no, sorry but it's been confirmed that that moon is not the same moon and it not being on the line as the planets and not holding the same context Popstar does makes it questionable to scale based on those sprites.
- 11,361
- 17,707
Well it was evaluated and everything was mathematically accepted, with a CRT being needed to determine what should be used.
So we’ll just use the 5-C end
- 11,361
- 17,707
I can calc the thing shown in the first video with the same methodology accepted in the Magolor calc. I think it’ll be slightly higher because the spin is considerably faster.
- 17,426
- 11,784
I would very much like to see a Star Dream calc
- 15,429
- 5,016
- Thread starter
- #93
I can evaluate proposals but not make them himself, just due to being too much work to place where should what powers go.
- 11,361
- 17,707
Actually, it won't work. I realized this just after posting the calc. The density of air in outer space is pretty much 0. We could use 1.003 kg/meters^3 in Magolor's case because it's a different dimension with its own properties and Kirby was on "ground level" when Magolor did the feat. That's not the case here
- 15,429
- 5,016
- Thread starter
- #95
What properties would those be? Just in case something was assumed that is not correct.
- 5,879
- 1,069
Can someone summarize what's been accepted?
- 11,361
- 17,707
Well I dunno, I'm just saying that it's its own thing, rather than Star Dream's case where they're literally in outer space. Also, Kirby's actually fighting on a "planet" in Magolor's case rather than fighting in outer space
Also, Another Dimension is that: another dimension. We know in Star Dream's case that the location is outer space, but we can't say for sure it's outer space in Magolor's case, so the default assumption for air properties would apply. Assuming anything other than the default for Another Dimension would be fallacious without support.
Last edited:
- 11,361
- 17,707
Sorry, I edited my post a few times, but hopefully I was able to get across what I'm trying to say
- 11,361
- 17,707
1. No
2. Yes
- 17,426
- 11,784
Then would everyone be alright with putting in Magolor's 3-A calc?
- 11,361
- 17,707
I don't think I'm understanding what you're saying, to be honest.
- 15,429
- 5,016
- Thread starter
- #105
You say that the space shown in Another Dimension isn't outer space, but it is, it is space because it looks like space. There is no reason for air properties to be a default assumption. The fact that this is "another dimension" as you say just means that it's other space rather than the one we the most time with, nothing more.
- 11,361
- 17,707
Saying it's outer space just because "it looks like it" is very shaky. It wouldn't make sense for it to be outer space to begin with given that there appears to actually be gravity in Another Dimension.
- 15,655
- 10,628
we probably will, that's why you main more than one verse, so you get only half or less disappointment
- 17,426
- 11,784
Not to mention it has a floor (and gravity like you said), so it can't be like normal outer space.
- 17,426
- 11,784
Why?
- 15,429
- 5,016
- Thread starter
- #112
Another Dimension is weird for the reasons it's weird, not more to be assumed. If it has gravity in it due to the most technical of reasons then sure, whatever, that's not the same as air, or that it lacks radiation, or whatever more things space has going for.
If the calc can be done via gravity then ig it's good (It needs to be clarified), if it needs space to be assumed to be filled with air then it's not, and other method should be used to calc it.
Last edited:
- 17,426
- 11,784
Can a rotational calc like that even be calced with gravity if there is no air?
- 11,361
- 17,707
My point in mentioning gravity is that outer space has zero gravity, so the fact that Another Dimension does is already a point against it being outer space.
- 17,426
- 11,784
Good point.
- 5,879
- 1,069
I will apply the tier 1 changes
- 15,429
- 5,016
- Thread starter
- #117
Not yet, and you didn't read the OP proposing another approach.
It isn't a point against it being outer space, just that its outer space has gravity. To say that it has more properties outer space has that Another Dimension didn't show doesn't make sense, it's a jump in logic.
- 11,361
- 17,707
It's just as fallacious to assume it is outer space just because of how it looks. With unknown realms, we go with the default. That's how it's been as far as I can tell.
- 17,426
- 11,784
Similar threads
