• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
So what will pre-Forgotten Land Kirby scale too?
It’s still to be decided how the 5-A rating will be applied. His first key will either be Low 5-B or 5-A

The rest of the keys are the same (though I might want to get a flat out 2-C rating in the future, will prolly save it for another crt, let’s keep to the currently relevant things)
 
It’s still to be decided how the 5-A rating will be applied. His first key will either be Low 5-B or 5-A

The rest of the keys are the same (though I might want to get a flat out 2-C rating in the future, will prolly save it for another crt, let’s keep to the currently relevant things)
Eseseso was referring to lifting strength
 
Idk about LS. I wanna leave it to Efi to evaluate this thing if he's back at any point. If we don't use that feat anymore we'll have to use idk what LS for kirby. We should be ok with scaling Kirby to Elfilis' LS.
 
It seems Elfilis didn't actually move the planet with TK sadly. He just made a big portal and let gravity do the rest
It was directly stated and shown that Elfilis pulled the planet through the vortex. Roche Limit is what tore apart the planets when they got close
 
For one reason or another, Zero is very bent on stopping Kirby, but doesn't use Possession to do so. I can't say why because we don't know exactly why, but that's how it is. And whether you want to call it a corruption or not, my intention was just to indicate that game mechanics are worth taking into account, especially because even Zero's "larger than a cloud" size is way bigger than the 2 meters you fight him at in-game. If I didn't make that clearer, I apologize.

Also you can't assume he changed his size between his arrival on Popstar and his fight with Kirby because he was never shown doing so.

Well, if you're very bent on using strictly physics, total energy isn't solely composed of kinetic energy. Yes, I should've mentioned this sooner, but there are far more types of energy. To begin with, potential energy is another type of mechanical energy alongside kinetic energy, and there are subsets of both potential energy and kinetic energy. On a broader scale, mechanical energy is only one of six types of energy. The law of conservation of energy dictates that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted into one form or another. If you want to fully apply physics, you must also acknowledge that Zero cannot be less than 5-A without violating the law of conservation of energy.

Well I've given a new argument, and I'll also take this time to apologize for getting heated. Even if I didn't directly insult you, I was getting very aggressive.
@Winter Also in case you missed it, this is my new argument in favor of scaling Kirby to 5-A. Essentially, energy in a system cannot be created or destroyed, only converted into another form. Thus, the energy in the "Zero system" would always be this 5-A level of energy.

You could apply this to 5-A Nova as well tbh, because the 5-A KE of Nova is a part of the "Nova system." As a result, Nova would always be 5-A and launching Marx into Nova would be 5-A for overcoming that energy. Supporting this is the fact that Nova can ram into the Sun and Moon without consequence to itself, meaning it has enough durability to withstand the recoil of its own KE.
 
@Winter Also in case you missed it, this is my new argument in favor of scaling Kirby to 5-A. Essentially, energy in a system cannot be created or destroyed, only converted into another form. Thus, the energy in the "Zero system" would always be this 5-A level of energy.

You could apply this to 5-A Nova as well tbh, because the 5-A KE of Nova is a part of the "Nova system." As a result, Nova would always be 5-A and launching Marx into Nova would be 5-A for overcoming that energy. Supporting this is the fact that Nova can ram into the Sun and Moon without consequence to itself, meaning it has enough durability to withstand the recoil of its own KE.
Nova example makes sense to be 5-A, so no matter if we agree to Zero’s KE = Smaller State, he’s going to get 5-A scaling off of Kirby

Zero being 5-A is still iffy to me. Sure, Energy can be transferred from a moving state to a stationary state but why would it be applicable from a smaller state to a larger state? Zero can still gain and disperse energy by transforming between the 2 states.
 
Nova example makes sense to be 5-A, so no matter if we agree to Zero’s KE = Smaller State, he’s going to get 5-A scaling off of Kirby

Zero being 5-A is still iffy to me. Sure, Energy can be transferred from a moving state to a stationary state but why would it be applicable from a smaller state to a larger state? Zero can still gain and disperse energy by transforming between the 2 states.
The energy is simply converted to a different form. Zero himself is a system, just as each human body is a system. So, even if he turns into a smaller state, the total energy in him will still amount to 5-A levels of energy.

I don't care nearly as much about this since we're in agreement on 5-A Nova and that 5-A yield is higher than Zero's 5-A yield but still I wanna say my piece on this
 
The energy is simply converted to a different form. Zero himself is a system, just as each human body is a system. So, even if he turns into a smaller state, the total energy in him will still amount to 5-A levels of energy.
You mean like Ant-man?
 
The energy is simply converted to a different form. Zero himself is a system, just as each human body is a system. So, even if he turns into a smaller state, the total energy in him will still amount to 5-A levels of energy.

I don't care nearly as much about this since we're in agreement on 5-A Nova and that 5-A yield is higher than Zero's 5-A yield but still I wanna say my piece on this
I am taking a guess here and assuming you think his natural size is the big one. I genuinely doubt that size is the bigger one. Scaling him off of other unique Dark Matter, they’re way smaller than a Thicc Zero. Considering his small size has to gain lots of mass to equal the big, I feel Thicc Eye would be > Smol Eye

But since we agree on the Nova 5-A rating this doesn’t really matter as much


So here’s what the general revisions will be that have been discussed:

- All pre-Canvas Curse bosses/main characters will be 5-A

- Magolor Spin Calc is rejected and Multi-Stellar LS should be removed

- All other revisions by the op


If all proposals come to agreement, this thread should be closed and the revisions can be applied
 
I am taking a guess here and assuming you think his natural size is the big one. I genuinely doubt that size is the bigger one. Scaling him off of other unique Dark Matter, they’re way smaller than a Thicc Zero. Considering his small size has to gain lots of mass to equal the big, I feel Thicc Eye would be > Smol Eye

But since we agree on the Nova 5-A rating this doesn’t really matter as much


So here’s what the general revisions will be that have been discussed:

- All pre-Canvas Curse bosses/main characters will be 5-A
What tier will the pre-Super Star characters be at? Low 5-B? High 6-A?
- Magolor Spin Calc is rejected and Multi-Stellar LS should be removed
Still not sure about that last part, but I'll leave it up to you guys
 
I heavily disagree with the Multi-Stellar LS being removed. It shouldn't be standard to assume that the we see isn't moved but only what we can touch of what we see and local light around the rest. The ground was spinning because we saw it spin, since we saw space spin too then space should be spinning, not the closeby light it gives off. If only the light was spinning then it would be stretching by doing so while still perfectly showing the stars sparkling now & then and the portal with Popstar in it & Popstar itself moving around. Wouldn't it be simpler to assume those things are just spinning in the same way the ground is? The wizard can also put everything in an interstellar range upside down via magic/spatial manip, making it more intuitive that he would be able to spin it rather than to give the illusion to spin it while in reality only affecting the light.
 
The wizard can also put everything in an interstellar range upside down via magic/spatial manip, making it more intuitive that he would be able to spin it rather than to give the illusion to spin it while in reality only affecting the light.
I did completely forget that Magolor can do this, actually. That does seem to more so support that he's actually affecting an Interstellar range
 
I heavily disagree with the Multi-Stellar LS being removed. It shouldn't be standard to assume that the we see isn't moved but only what we can touch of what we see and local light around the rest. The ground was spinning because we saw it spin, since we saw space spin too then space should be spinning, not the closeby light it gives off.
I didn’t say only the ground was moved. I said the distance the spatial manipulation affected is interminable. Space bending the area doesn’t automatically mean the stars are too. Their light would bend no matter the range it affected.

If only the light was spinning then it would be stretching by doing so while still perfectly showing the stars sparkling now & then and the portal with Popstar in it & Popstar itself moving around.
This point doesn’t make sense. If the light of the Star is bent, you wouldn’t see the same star perfectly. It’s being distorted. Popstar can still have it’s light move around due to distortions and not actually move on it’s own.


Wouldn't it be simpler to assume those things are just spinning in the same way the ground is? The wizard can also put everything in an interstellar range upside down via magic/spatial manip, making it more intuitive that he would be able to spin it rather than to give the illusion to spin it while in reality only affecting the light.
It being easier to add doesn’t prove that point to be anymore right or the other wrong. The other Spatial Manipulation feat still would follow the same as this one. Space is distorted, no telling the distance it covers.
 
It being easier to add doesn’t prove that point to be anymore right or the other wrong. The other Spatial Manipulation feat still would follow the same as this one. Space is distorted, no telling the distance it covers.
All I'm gonna add here is that technically it can via Occam's Razor
 
All I'm gonna add here is that technically it can via Occam's Razor
I meeeean, true but it’s doesn’t 100% define that the simpler one is always correct. Take a show for instance that uses this often, The Watcher. They use this to eliminate 2 of the neighbors off their suspect list (I think I’m referring to the right moment, may be wrong) but turns out they were wrong and they were added back as a potential suspect. Point here being Occam’s razor isn’t a 100% efficient way to come to a conclusion. It just chooses a similar explanation over a more complicated one.
 
I know it's not a be-all end-all by any stretch, but it's something worth taking into account is all
 
I know it's not a be-all end-all by any stretch, but it's something worth taking into account is all
I agree it definitely could be taken into account, but I’m still sticking with the removal. The feat is confusing given how spatial manipulation works and I’d be willing to go with the conclusion that it’s interminable rather than assuming it’s outright moving the stars
 
Foxthefox, please debate properly. I know you have many things to say, and any time is good to say them. Idk the context of that Cuphead feat, I don't remember seeing anything at that level at all, and yes DB logic to make that be Planet level is wrong. We need to stick with this Kirby feat.
 
So what are our thoughts for the revisions. We removing MS LS or naw? Once we cover this, we could prolly add all of the revisions
 
Well, all outdated MUs need to be removed first, as I clarified in the OP and a few other times. It seems as if nobody's gonna do that, and that's an issue.
 
We can't wait for all outdated vs threads to be removed before the changes.

That should be for afterwords.
 
Your reasoning being?
Because it’s easier? Why remove everything before when you can do it all while other revisions are applied. Really doesn’t make sense to do it at different times, it would just take longer waiting for them before you actually apply the main points in the op
 
Your reasoning being?
Because the accuracy of Kirby's profile should be prioritized before checking to see which matches may or may not be irrelevant!

Heck, if we want to show the matches are outdated, we need to change Kirby's profile first to show why, otherwise people may not understand why we're removing matches!
 
Because it’s easier? Why remove everything before when you can do it all while other revisions are applied. Really doesn’t make sense to do it at different times, it would just take longer waiting for them before you actually apply the main points in the op
Well, I'm not going to remove those MU myself. Remove them also means removing them from the other profiles, not just the Kirby characters.
Because the accuracy of Kirby's profile should be prioritized before checking to see which matches may or may not be irrelevant!

Heck, if we want to show the matches are outdated, we need to change Kirby's profile first to show why, otherwise people may not understand why we're removing matches!
It seems clear after months that nobody cares to do that job, so I disagree, and doubt the care put into prioritizing that. You need to link the thread that causes the change in the summary when editing a profile.
 
Well, I'm not going to remove those MU myself. Remove them also means removing them from the other profiles, not just the Kirby characters.
Still easier doing those at once. Removing all of them on the Kirby profiles brings it down to like half of the MU’s necessary to remove. Just wait a little, matchups aren’t a 110% priority here


It seems clear after months that nobody cares to do that job, so I disagree, and doubt the care put into prioritizing that. You need to link the thread that causes the change in the summary when editing a profile.
Tbf you are simply just asking to a wide audience like “hey anyone who views this thread, remove these matchups” without actually being clear cut. Like the profiles aren’t even open in the first place. You need to dedicate time to when the profiles are actually all open so you can take it down in all one fell swoop and not waste time doing it at separate times.
 
Back
Top