- 6,206
- 686
Probably beating someone up
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am not even sure he{d need to practice. Raian was one of the biggest bids you could make for the tournament, despite the fact it is made clear Raian wasn't willing and never even tried actually using any Kure techniques, merely overwhelming by pure statistical superiority.PTSOXMONKEY99 said:Let's hope Raian has been practicing his Kure techniques or else he's gonna cost the Kengan team an L
Except that argument doesn't hold up when Pre-Movement is an Agito/Kuroki thing, Akoya has nothing similar at all, just his super reflexes.Xulrev said:The hypersonic calc absolutely should be lost.
It's stated numerous times that bullets are something that the best fighter simply cannot react to, they must be predicted. It's the basis of pre-movement for crying out loud
It also doesn't hold up when we don't see when Akoya moved in relation to the gun going off, though. It's AN ENORMOUS presumption to make that he moved post-firing instead of when the twitchy, panicky person was going to pull the trigger.LSirLancelotDuLacl said:Except that argument doesn't hold up when Pre-Movement is an Agito/Kuroki thing, Akoya has nothing similar at all, just his super reflexes.
Do you honest to God not see the lack of sense in using "aimdodge" to justify a dude slower than bullets being able to remain completely unscathed from a rain of bullets by a dozen guns with a good couple of automatic weapons and no potential cover nearby? Are you really this willing to stick to such a bullshit idea that sounds nice in theory but falls flat in execution? Are we really gonna ignore the clear image of him fighting people with automatic weapons in wide, open fields while he's completely unarmed?Xulrev said:Muteba, the guy who has Daredevil-tier sensory organs, being able to aimdodge is somehow absurd?
We also don't see him dodge any gunfire, for the record.
But no we aren't disregrading the explanations of the author here, we would be disregarding the explanations of the author and literally every major character in-verse. We are given objective data. We use objective data. If our calcs come out to something different, obviously we worked from flawed presumptions.
Literally nothing is on me to explain here thankfully. I can just rely on objective narration and character statements all day long and until someone shows me an objective bullet dodge in-series (none exists), I'm good since the evidence is solidly on my side here.