- 18,393
- 14,323
It is somehow supererogatory to restrict what the author need to say to fit our standards. Also, you don't need “dual systems”, it depends on the fiction setting.
In MG, we have “Order” that presents it. You will see that those requirements contradict the fiction setting/author intentions.
Also? DT said this.
And I find it really commonsensible.
In MG, we have “Order” that presents it. You will see that those requirements contradict the fiction setting/author intentions.
Also? DT said this.
I don't think we should codify which words appear in the statement. That just seems unnecessarily inflexible. As said, synonyms and paraphrasing are acceptable. This is the type of thing where one should just look at the explanations the verse gives and think about whether they equate to the requirements for the type that the page lays out.
And I find it really commonsensible.