Johnny Joestar and the Infinite Rotation (High 3-A poll)

[ProfessorLord]

Based on the arguments and discussions from this thread.

Yes, keep the high 3-A rating (16): ProfessorLord, Wokistan, Chartate101, Kepekley23, DragonEmperor, Lapitus the Impaler, TacticalNuke007, KLOL506, ShiroyashaGinSan, Axl233, Jamesthetaker, Kyschan21, TriforcePower1, ALRF, Paul Frank, TISSG7RedGrave,

No, take away the high 3-A rating (10): ZacharyGrossman273, Monarch Laciel, WeeklyBattles, DMUA, LordGriffon1000, CrimsonStarFallen, HST Master, PaChi2, Ricsi-vigorsi, Mr. Bambu,

This would change the infinite rotation from high 3-A into something that is agreed on. This would also apply to Gyro Zeppeli as well.

 

[Monarch_Laciel]

Remove it

 

[ProfessorLord]

Remove it

Im doing a proper poll rather than collecting votes from people who voted 200 posts ago based on a single argument, remove yourself.

 

[Monarch_Laciel]

I'm not talking about removing the thread, I'm talking about removing the High 3-A rating. This is my contribution to the poll

If I was going to remove it I would have done so without asking.

 

[ProfessorLord]

sorry boss, not adding me or you to the list. you started the downgrade thread, I started this one. lets count votes from someone other than ourselves.

 

[Monarch_Laciel]

No, that's not how this works. We are both people who support one side or another. We must be added as well.

 

[Wokistan]

If he applies it the same way to both of you it doesn't really matter.

I'm still for keeping it from what I've seen.

 

[Chartate101]

I'm for keeping it

 

[Monarch_Laciel]

I'm for keeping it

Did you read through that entire thread?

 

[ProfessorLord]

Did you read through that entire thread?

Not a pre-requisite and definitely not enforceable. I would read like three or four arguments and make a decision from there, I cant blame anyone for not reading 200 posts.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Remove it

 

[Kepekley23]

Keep it.

 

[DMUA]

Get rid of it.

It's not High 3-A under Joules per second and High 3-A nails seem very, very iffy.

 

[Kepekley23]

> Joules "per second"

> Infinite energy

 

[DragonEmperor23]

Keep it

 

[ProfessorLord]

lol I did a spit take when I saw that

fiction is iffy in general DMUA, but of course, vote counted.

 

[Monarch_Laciel]

Did you read through that entire thread?

Not a pre-requisite and definitely not enforceable. I would read like three or four arguments and make a decision from there, I cant blame anyone for not reading 200 posts.

Oh I see how it is.

So if they only read the first few arguments, it's ok as long as they vote for you, but if they don't read the entire thread and they vote for me, it's invalid?

Because that is basically what you just said. By making this thread, you were trying to make it so that people who hadn't read the more recent arguments could potentially changed their vote instead. But now, you're saying that its fine if they only read a few arguments.

You're a god damn hypocrite and I'm a sorely tempted to close this thread and go back to the one with the actual arguments instead of the "FRAs"

 

[Iapitus_The_Impaler]

Keep it.

 

[LordGriffin1000]

Did a quick read through of the other thread and I'm leaning towards removing it.

 

[TacticalNuke002]

I'd say keep it. He does have to generate that infinite energy himself.

 

[Iapitus_The_Impaler]

Also, I would like to add that it should probably just be unknown anyway since it is largely hax based and the bullets bypass durability

 

[ProfessorLord]

chill monarch, I wanted a new thread because people voted BEFORE arguments could actually be fleshed out and presented.

they dont have to read 200 posts to form an opinion, but id rather them read 4 fleshed out latest arguments rather than the first 4 arguments.

dont do it brother, youre better than that.

 

[Monarch_Laciel]

I'd say keep it. He does have to generate that infinite energy himself.

But he can't use it as AP, which is what you need for it to qualify as AP

 

[ProfessorLord]

> uses the spin to generate further AP with his nails

> shoots nails

that is him using it for AP

 

[Monarch_Laciel]

chill monarch, I wanted a new thread because people voted BEFORE arguments could actually be fleshed out and presented.
they dont have to read 200 posts to form an opinion, but id rather them read 4 fleshed out latest arguments rather than the first 4 arguments.

dont do it brother, youre better than that.

No you ass. That's not what happened. People had been making their decisions throughout that entire thread, but you decided that they didn't count because they hadn't read the whole thing.

I'm closing this thread. If people want to debate this, they can do it on the actual thread, not the poll you made to get FRAs.

https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2488514#180

 

[Kepekley23]

Closing debatable threads without discussing it beforehand is a no. Sorry.

 

[ProfessorLord]

Closing debatable threads without discussing it beforehand is a no. Sorry.

Went to RVT but thank you so much.

 

[Monarch_Laciel]

This is not the debating thread Kep

https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2488514#184

^ This is the debating thread.

This thread is a thread PL made so that he could get a bunch of FRAs from people who couldn't be bothered to read the entire debating thread and see his arguments getting shredded.

 

[Kepekley23]

I like how your first post is contributing to the poll, but then you say this thread was only made to hide his arguments getting shredded when he starts getting votes.

Aren't you the one who said it was time to let people vote after both arguments were presented in the other thread? What's the problem with doing so on another thread? Just redirect those who agree with you to this one if it bothers you so much.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Monarch's not wrong

 

[Monarch_Laciel]

I like how your first post is contributing to the poll, but then you say this thread was only made to hide his arguments getting shredded when he starts getting votes.
Aren't you the one who said it was time to let people vote after both arguments were presented in the other thread? What's the problem with doing so on another thread? Just redirect those who agree with you to this one if it bothers you so much.

The problem is that I have no faith that people are at least scrolling through the original thread and reading all the arguments before making their decisions, because it's a lot easier to just go with the idea of "oh I like Jojo so I'll just say I want to keep it"

 

[DragonEmperor23]

Don't some people do that even with the arguments being higher up in the thread?

 

[ProfessorLord]

Thats VsBattles in general, @Monarch.

Theres no telling whether or not people actually read arguments for their fav character before voting. You cant enforce and bully them into doing so either.

 

[DMUA]

I'd like to say something to both parties

To Monarch, I'd like to say, calm the fork down. You're not helping this.

To everyone else: I have only seen Monarch get this pissed to one other person, to say, myself. I think if anything needs to clean up here, it's not our jolly emesary of Breinhard

Let's keep this to the main thread

 

[ProfessorLord]

@Everyone this thread is for voting only, go to the other thread for debating.

 

[CrimsonStarFallen]

I vote to take it away.

 

[KLOL506]

I vote for the rating to be the way it is. I am in league with Prof and Kep's reasonings.

 

[Monarch_Laciel]

I'm going to go for a walk and calm down. I need to buy Christmas presents anyway. Thank you DMUA, I needed that.

 

[ProfessorLord]

Unrelated to the thread but have fun I guess @Monarch.

Im assuming standard 24 hour grace period starting 1 hour, that's when I got 7 votes.

 

[Torlikoff]

Why would there be a grace period? There aren't exactly set rules for this.