- 32,358
- 20,298
I like Dargoo' blog.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Apparently no, although is still a little paradoxical for my standards. But for make it less complicated, I think anyone that predate existance itself would qualify.Nedge1000 said:I was busy so a quick question: Is idealistic Nonexistent Physiology reserved for Tier 1-A?
There are characters that have feats of affecting with conceptual manipulation. Saying, ithese idealistic characterics: "The lack of absolutely everything, including presence on a conceptual framework of any degree" is defintively NLF.Andytrenom said:I would guess a conceptual manipulation that works on a greater scale than the framework they are absent from would affect them. That's how basically any other NLFesque ability would be treated.
I agree.Andytrenom said:In that case it may be. Afaik even a 1-A realm shouldn't be beyond conceptual framework of any degree.
Even Conceptual Manipulation (Type 1) not applying to them is a big no-no. The concept of nonexistence at best is a False-platonic concept or Type Concept 2. Also, Void Users have Nonexistent Interaction and others have Nonexistent Interaction anyway so at this point the "beyond conceptual framework of every level or degree." need to be removed hereThe Causality said:Don't agree
I explain why later
It was a hypothetical case, in fiction, most of the time, nonexistence tends to be Type 2. In tier 1-A, it tends to be Type 1.Assaltwaffle said:@Nedge1000
The concept of nonexistence is whatever the verse's abstract universals are. Nothing dictates that it is, by default, Type 2. Under Plato and verses that use true Platonism, it would be Type 1. Under Plato and verses that use Platonism to a certain extent, it would be Type 2, and so on and so forth.
abstract = conceptThe Causality said:Well, assalt said everything
Anyway there exist many tier 2 with Idealistic like D&D and UKG
Assaltwaffle said:@Nedge1000
The concept of nonexistence is whatever the verse's abstract universals are. Nothing dictates that it is, by default, Type 2. Under Plato and verses that use true Platonism, it would be Type 1. Under Plato and verses that use Platonism to a certain extent, it would be Type 2, and so on and so forth.
My point they are just that and that would give Abstract Existence (Type 1; Embodies a void) as Noncexitence is still a concept.The Causality said:That doesn't change the fact that characters can be Conceptualy Non existent, what is your point?
But then you would go in full cirlce and do "the concept of a concept of a concept of a concept..."Nedge1000 said:My point they are just that and that would give Abstract Existence (Type 1; Embodies a void) as Noncexitence is still a concept.The Causality said:That doesn't change the fact that characters can be Conceptualy Non existent, what is your point?