Our standards for light literally tell you you are dead wrong, plus what IMade said. Don't like it? Make a CRT, not my problem.
- The beam is called lightspeed by reliable sources
- It is stated to be made of photons or light itself, again by a reliable source
^stated to be made of lighrays and the only other technique in the series like it is stated to be lightspeed big oof my friend, IMade can say what he wants but the multiple translations i've seen have told me a different story
Tata is a knowledgeable member that has been related to many of these verses revisions. This is no appeal to authority, just telling you that people just as or more knowledgeable than you have also reached that conclusion.
You basically said "I don't need to prove anything cause Tata argees with me" its an appeal to authority end of story
And it is indeed proving a negative by Occam's Razor considering hyperbole is EXTREMELY commonly used for the sake of impact and energy
Thats not proving a negative proving a negative would be me saying "prove it isn't hyperbole" lol when i say prove its hyperbole i want you to show me scans of supposed inconsistency in it so i can tell you why thats not the case
not to mention your "it's in comparison to normal shinobi" hinges on exactly one line of the entire book.
Not just one line but multiple such as when it says Kabuto is the "smartest we've seen" in Databook 1, it's only talking about pre Orochimaru/Hiruzen stats and events. Or when it says "His Power is insane" or "Her intelligence is insane" it's speaking relatively to their classes, not the verse in general.
A good few are mentioned above, and in the OP. Or have you literally just joined in and read nothing else?
I want you to give me examples so i can debunk your interpretation of them cause again what other ppl say doesn't matter for OUR debate
Listing up fallacies to make it sound like you have a point doesn't give you a point.
Go thing the fallacies aren't the only part of my argument then huh
Kakashi at no point is showcased like he'd have such an extreme speed difference from B. Ever heard of consistency?
He kept up with Minato late War who's > Bee in terms of speed not to mention Kakashi just got a huge speed amp as soon as the War Arc started keeping up with multiple V2 Jins and KCM Naruto despite the fact he was slower than Pain in the previous arc lol and the feat used to downplay the Raikage here was done by an Early Shippuden Kakashi so it wouldn't effect the Raikages statement, Kakashi is the most power creeped person in the verse and he's who your agument entirely hinges on moot point.
The nonexistent light speed attack that is only SoL by your erroneous interpretation, but that is consistent because War Arc characters weaker than Raikage can evade it, who by the words of the data book has lariat at light speed so it is consistent? No circular stuff at all.
Erroneous despite the fact it meets the criteria oof reacting=/=evading they saw it coming but they still couldn't do anything and got tagged regardless, still no circular reasoning you just didn't read my argument its not my problem you cant understand it.
Casually dodging? What battle did you see?
Yes casually thats what happens when your fast enough to dodge light from literally a few feet infront of you while being hindered by an enemy in mid air
Not to mention the attack is base speed of light...
Yes its also a casual no hand sign jutsu Madara spat out at him desperately and he wasn't even impressed when Naruto dodged it because light speed isn't impressive to either of them by that point
So people leaps and bounds below Naruto are close to him in speed. Makes sense.
Nice strawman people leaps and bounds below Naruto can dodge light fang that does not make them as fast as him by any strech of the imagination
And here I am gonna break attitude for a second and ask, did you just realize how incredibly dumb what you just said is? "Statements are consistent through the databook, so this is consistent"? That's your reply to something not being flowery language?
The argument in the OP is about it possibly being hyperbolic cause of the "no person can evade the attack" statement not the "almost speed of light" statement why does an entire different line of text disprove its crediblity again prove its hyperbolic or don't waste my time.
Ugh... I am done. Others have it handled anyway. I won't participate more in this.
Concession accepted thank you goodbye