CinnabarManx421
He/Him- 5,806
- 3,717
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Important: The discussion topics organisation
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- Status
CinnabarManx421
He/Him- 5,806
- 3,717
Bobsican said:
CinnabarManx421
He/Him- 5,806
- 3,717
...Did I miss something? You posted this in the right thread right?
CinnabarManx421
He/Him- 5,806
- 3,717
Ah, yes I see it now. That doesn't seem like a good idea to me either. (I mean, I've not even been here 6 months, does that mean my ability to do that would be stripped away?)
CinnabarManx421
He/Him- 5,806
- 3,717
Mistake on my part, I didn't see what you were talking about. I see it now though.Arestoron said:
- 15,968
- 8,184
I think the Forum Topics Pages should be put in the Discussion Rules because I still see threads with many inappropriate discussion topics.
Going in threads and explaining the topic to explained others is tedious when many members might be unaware of the conclusion so having a rule would make inappropriate discussion topics far less-likely as many members follow the wiki rules
Going in threads and explaining the topic to explained others is tedious when many members might be unaware of the conclusion so having a rule would make inappropriate discussion topics far less-likely as many members follow the wiki rules
- 167,857
- 76,474
- Thread starter
- #99
That seems like a good idea. I am open for suggestions regarding what the new rule should say.
Would something like this be fine?
"Only add topics that are directly relevant to discussion threads. This includes the names of verses and characters for which revisions are being argued about. However, do not add mostly unrelated topics, such as for instruction or policy pages, unless the contents of the pages themselves are being discussed. Otherwise it will get hard to find important older discussions for each particular subject. Click here for further informatio."
I am open for help with refining the wording of the text, as I am very busy.
Would something like this be fine?
"Only add topics that are directly relevant to discussion threads. This includes the names of verses and characters for which revisions are being argued about. However, do not add mostly unrelated topics, such as for instruction or policy pages, unless the contents of the pages themselves are being discussed. Otherwise it will get hard to find important older discussions for each particular subject. Click here for further informatio."
I am open for help with refining the wording of the text, as I am very busy.
- 10,786
- 1,635
I feel the need to make a small correction, but I cannot think of anything.
- 167,857
- 76,474
- Thread starter
- #105
- Status
Similar threads
- Sticky
