Important: The discussion topics organisation

[CinnabarManx421]

I removed a few tags that led to Garbodor for no reason.

 

[Bobsican]

I removed a few tags that led to Garbodor for no reason.

Cal explicity said that he did that for memetic purposes.

 

[Wokistan]

Just here to ask why did nedge just delete a bunch of the pages that got memed? They were still actual pages, that's not a reason for deletion.

 

[Bobsican]

I´m also a bit sorry for using Bleach as a meme tag, by the way.

 

[CinnabarManx421]

I´m also a bit sorry for using Bleach as a meme tag, by the way.

lol "a bit sorry", not completly sorry. still likes that he did it a little bit ovo.

 

[Arestoron]

Couldn't you have at least alerted these people that they're doing something wrong?

 

[Arestoron]

6 months is ridiculous

 

[CinnabarManx421]

...Did I miss something? You posted this in the right thread right?

 

[Wokistan]

I don't like it either

 

[Wokistan]

A 6 month restriction before using topics was suggested above. I thought he was in the wrong place at first too.

 

[Bobsican]

Just here to ask why did nedge just delete a bunch of the pages that got memed? They were still actual pages, that's not a reason for deletion.

Just checked, I think they were just moved to something else but with no redirection link.

 

[Arestoron]

...Did I miss something? You posted this in the right thread right?

Okay, so why would it not be in the correct thread?

 

[Elizhaa]

Just here to ask why did nedge just delete a bunch of the pages that got memed? They were still actual pages, that's not a reason for deletion.

They were moved not deleted as mentioned and explained above, Wokista.

 

[CinnabarManx421]

Ah, yes I see it now. That doesn't seem like a good idea to me either. (I mean, I've not even been here 6 months, does that mean my ability to do that would be stripped away?)

 

[CinnabarManx421]

Okay, so why would it not be in the correct thread?

Mistake on my part, I didn't see what you were talking about. I see it now though.

 

[Arestoron]

Yeah.

 

[Elizhaa]

I removed a few tags that led to Garbodor for no reason.

Cal explicity said that he did that for memetic purposes.

I don't think it should matter since the premise is these type link are unacceptable

 

[Elizhaa]

I think the Forum Topics Pages should be put in the Discussion Rules because I still see threads with many inappropriate discussion topics.

• Example

Going in threads and explaining the topic to explained others is tedious when many members might be unaware of the conclusion so having a rule would make inappropriate discussion topics far less-likely as many members follow the wiki rules

 

[Antvasima]

That seems like a good idea. I am open for suggestions regarding what the new rule should say.

Would something like this be fine?

"Only add topics that are directly relevant to discussion threads. This includes the names of verses and characters for which revisions are being argued about. However, do not add mostly unrelated topics, such as for instruction or policy pages, unless the contents of the pages themselves are being discussed. Otherwise it will get hard to find important older discussions for each particular subject. Click here for further informatio."

I am open for help with refining the wording of the text, as I am very busy.

 

[Elizhaa]

Antvasima, I think the wording is fine.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. What do the rest of you think?

 

[The_King_of_Prudence]

I feel the need to make a small correction, but I cannot think of anything.

 

[Kaltias]

Looks fine to me

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. I will add it then.

 

[Antvasima]

I have done so: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/index.php?title=Discussion_Rules&diff=4128415&oldid=4029836

 

[AKM sama]

Looks good.

 

[Antvasima]

Thanks.