• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Important: The discussion topics organisation

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just here to ask why did nedge just delete a bunch of the pages that got memed? They were still actual pages, that's not a reason for deletion.
 
I don't like it either
 
A 6 month restriction before using topics was suggested above. I thought he was in the wrong place at first too.
 
Wokistan said:
Just here to ask why did nedge just delete a bunch of the pages that got memed? They were still actual pages, that's not a reason for deletion.
Click to expand...
Just checked, I think they were just moved to something else but with no redirection link.
 
Wokistan said:
Just here to ask why did nedge just delete a bunch of the pages that got memed? They were still actual pages, that's not a reason for deletion.
Click to expand...
They were moved not deleted as mentioned and explained above, Wokista.
 
Ah, yes I see it now. That doesn't seem like a good idea to me either. (I mean, I've not even been here 6 months, does that mean my ability to do that would be stripped away?)
 
I think the Forum Topics Pages should be put in the Discussion Rules because I still see threads with many inappropriate discussion topics.

Going in threads and explaining the topic to explained others is tedious when many members might be unaware of the conclusion so having a rule would make inappropriate discussion topics far less-likely as many members follow the wiki rules
 
That seems like a good idea. I am open for suggestions regarding what the new rule should say.

Would something like this be fine?

"Only add topics that are directly relevant to discussion threads. This includes the names of verses and characters for which revisions are being argued about. However, do not add mostly unrelated topics, such as for instruction or policy pages, unless the contents of the pages themselves are being discussed. Otherwise it will get hard to find important older discussions for each particular subject. Click here for further informatio."

I am open for help with refining the wording of the text, as I am very busy.
 
Okay. What do the rest of you think?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
EXTREMELY IMPORTANT: Proper use of discussion thread tags/categories
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Antvasima
Important information regarding a solution for our recently wiped clean notifications for new replies to subscribed discussion threads
Replies
0
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
AKM sama
Antvasima has reached over 400,000 wiki edits!
2
Replies
69
Views
3K
LordGriffin1000
LordGriffin1000
ImmortalDread
  • Locked
Most Important Discussion Rule Section - Staff Thread Creation Guidelines
2
Replies
63
Views
6K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Antvasima
I am taking a vacation
2
Replies
76
Views
9K
Zeinx1
Zeinx1
Back
Top