- 15,443
- 7,154
Exactly, so it was an irrelevant boost until the Garou fight.“his rate of growth, which got unnoticed by anyone, since was nobodely remotely par on strength”
Meaning his power until then didn't change on a notable rate at all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly, so it was an irrelevant boost until the Garou fight.“his rate of growth, which got unnoticed by anyone, since was nobodely remotely par on strength”
not irrelevant boost, the question is: he was already too powerful before, and there was NONE to measure this.Exactly, so it was an irrelevant boost until the Garou fight.
Meaning his power until then didn't change on a notable rate at all.
me when you have no evidence of it being hyperbolic or proof to discredit the THREE statementsmoving all creation and infinite power…
If your hyperbolic statement is valid, this one should be too.
Because, the **** you use to support this random this? Being the strongest in the universe capped to destroy earths surface meanwhile theres others high dragons such as psykorochi that can OBLITERATE earths surface without efforts lol
very ******* slow? audiobook’s saitama one shotted 1 day younger saitamaYou see, if he feels nothing, his grow rate will be very ******* slow.
Only from Garou it was relevant.
Assuming that machine could replicate Saitama's power lmao.very ******* slow? audiobook’s saitama one shotted 1 day younger saitama
And ByAsura made a CRT to get it removed, and it was accepted and already appliedvery ******* slow? audiobook’s saitama one shotted 1 day younger saitama
Isn’t that the same simulator that couldn’t simulate metal bat’s AD, why would it be able to be accurate with saitama’s AD?very ******* slow? audiobook’s saitama one shotted 1 day younger saitama
it can be three, two, ten, twelve, doenst matter, it wouldnt change the fact that it’s a hyperbolic information.me when you have no evidence of it being hyperbolic or proof to discredit the THREE statements
You are straight up lying at this point man…please let me argue with someone else. Psykos quite literally is weaker than what the csrc scales to
things does not become hyperbolic or valid just because you want, ziller.Isn’t that the same simulator that couldn’t simulate metal bat’s AD, why would it be able to be accurate with saitama’s AD?
Also pretty sure past saitama was created by Genos’ own interpretation of his power or something.
Well the orochi stuff is over, so ignore page 1 and half of page 2.Finally got home and I see that this is now three pages long....
Coom literally bringing up something that has already been rejected due to how painfully unreliable it is and that it literally misrepresents AD and is terrible.things does not become hyperbolic or valid just because you want, ziller.
Well Boros would simply scale above that too then, so I support this tatsumaki upgrade!!!!!!!well, the last thing i say here, if this RANDOM “strongest in the universe” thing is used for scaling, i’d really want to see tatsumaki being scale to moving all creation
this is literally the same thing you’re doing here trying to scale boros to tatsumaki, we all know how this is gonna end.Coom literally bringing up something that has already been rejected due to how painfully unreliable it is and that it literally misrepresents AD and is terrible.
and Boros had his title of “strongest in the universe” before fighting saitama, and it quite clearly is just stating that their fight would determine who is the strongestBoros' at his peak (Collapsing Star Roaring Cannon) is superior in output to Tatsumaki and just about everyone else bar Saitama.
Base Boros does not have to have higher physical stats than Tatsumaki's esper powers in order to be considered the Strongest in the Universe, from what I can tell.
even thought that she can just tank csrc and one shot him after he is staminaless?Boros' at his peak (Collapsing Star Roaring Cannon) is superior in output to Tatsumaki and just about everyone else bar Saitama.
Base Boros does not have to have higher physical stats than Tatsumaki's esper powers in order to be considered the Strongest in the Universe, from what I can tell.
I mean, physical strength can be used to counter the esper powers. Why is Pre-Training Saitama High 6-A otherwise?Boros' at his peak (Collapsing Star Roaring Cannon) is superior in output to Tatsumaki and just about everyone else bar Saitama.
Base Boros does not have to have higher physical stats than Tatsumaki's esper powers in order to be considered the Strongest in the Universe, from what I can tell.
3 clear statements that have no directly contradicting evidence, vs a vague tatsumaki statement that is demonstrably false/outlierthis is literally the same thing you’re doing here trying to scale boros to tatsumaki, we all know how this is gonna end.
which boros doesnt have.I mean, physical strength can be used to counter the esper powers. Why is Pre-Training Saitama High 6-A otherwise?
Let’s keep things classy, my fellow Boner (Boros fan)Those Tatsumaki lolicons are just desperate.
Be mindful about how you use this word in this sitelolicons
I mean, am I wrong?Let’s keep things classy, my fellow Boner (Boros fan)
?Those Tatsumaki lolicons are just desperate.
Dawg, can you stop acting like a child??
every week theres one post being rejected of boros’ upgrade, and you say im desperate?
at least i coudlve upgrade tatsumaki 2 times already, and look, i didnt need to mention boros my crts
This is a debate not a roast sessionI mean, am I wrong?
What am I supposed to say with all these excuses?
Yeah you definitely aren't biased.at least i coudlve upgrade tatsumaki 2 times already
no directly contradicting?3 clear statements that have no directly contradicting evidence, vs a vague tatsumaki statement that is demonstrably false/outlier
I don’t have to explain this to anybody here.
you are supposed to be quiet and get off if you cant have a nice conversationI mean, am I wrong?
What am I supposed to say with all these excuses?
Technically Boros was almost out of energy from meteoric burst so….not really an anti feat, even if we go with the fallacy that destructive power = AP at all times (something the AP page directly disproves)no directly contradicting?
being able to destroy earths surface using all of his energy, meanwhile tatsumaki, psykorochi, base orochi, genos can do the same without perfoming a suicidal attack?
being the strongest in the universe even thought he NEVER faced blast before?
and you tell me that nothing contradicts? Bro just stop.
he just called me lolicon and i answered him how he deserved.Dawg, can you stop acting like a child?
almost out of energy from what? from perfoming an island level attack of throwing saitama to the moon?Technically Boros was almost out of energy from meteoric burst so….not really an anti feat, even if we go with the fallacy that destructive power = AP at all times (something the AP page directly disproves)
it’s not my fault. I was literally just arguing in tatsumaki’s favour, but your childilsh friends couldnt countain themselves before insulting me, but this is expected from borobrosOn another note, I knew that this would inevitably turn into a shitshow the moment I brought tatsumaki vs Boros into this, but I’m going to have to ask everyone to simply put a stop to it.
This is a crt, and I don’t feel like having it interrupted by derailing arguments amongst yourselves.
An alternative term for Destructive Capacity which has more direct meaning: The Destructive Capacity that an attack is equivalent to. A character with a certain degree of attack potency does not necessarily need to cause destructive feats on that level, but can cause damage to characters that can withstand such forces. As such it isn't proof of a low attack potency, if a character's attacks only cause a small amount of destruction.almost out of energy from what? from perfoming an island level attack of throwing saitama to the moon?
tatsumaki was semidead when she APSTOMPED psykorochi.
Bro, this doesnt change the fact that he is FEATLESS.An alternative term for Destructive Capacity which has more direct meaning: The Destructive Capacity that an attack is equivalent to. A character with a certain degree of attack potency does not necessarily need to cause destructive feats on that level, but can cause damage to characters that can withstand such forces. As such it isn't proof of a low attack potency, if a character's attacks only cause a small amount of destruction.
We are aware that this technically violates the principle of conservation of energy, as it should logically disperse upon impact, but fiction generally tends to ignore this fact, so we overlook it as well.