So what will be his justification for High 1-B
since you are suggesting we should remove
or do you want to remove Hulk's High 1-B?
I don't care about removing that, I just wanted to remove things that I saw as false. He still has that feat against that Celestial in his profile, which I still disagree with but I would need to go over Celestials scaling to cover that.
I couldn't comment in a closed thread.
The point is that it wouldn't matter, as the source energy dispersed across infinite worlds would still need to be infinite to have any effects.
Well, you say this but I have no idea what it means,
see here, you reply to my comment but you don't say anything on the argument.
- By your logic, if "I punch and shake a road leading to a city" then I'm shaking the road and the city, not just the road, and a profile displaying this would say as much ignoring the fact that we don't know if I shoke the city.
- By your logic, it doesn't matter the fact that the universes reached by this didn't have their spaces destroyed by the infinite destruction, but rather had regular earthquakes. If something can be interpreted in ways A, B or C then the higher the assumptions the least likely they are, and if there is logical proof that the highest assumption can't be then what even is the thought process to go with it anyway? "It doesn't matter because everything has anti-feats, so who cares about anti-feats, fiction doesn't have to function to reality does"? It's just giving up and being strong headed. I know you don't have other reasons because you don't say them.
Again, you say this but I have no idea what it means.
Added to that you agree with me to remove something but not for the reasons I gave, so again, I have no idea from where you're coming from since I don't even know if you understood what I said when reading it, you put me in a frustrating situation.
There is literally a section in the link I posted that is specifically goes over Thor supposedly holding back in all his encounters
This is immensely vague.
Your right I don’t know everything, so I wouldn’t mind seeing these instances of constantly overhyping weaker characters
- See here most of them under "Planet level when holding back", you may also see all the new scans added to the scetion below on him holding back. He didn't do it against the High Evolutionary specifically, so that was my mistake.
- See some battles here with Loki.
I’m referring to the dialogue because it would show how Hulk feels or even his actions. He looks and feels more annoyed then ragefull
This argument is terrible. It doesn't matter how he doesn't look and feel more annoyed to you for him to be ragefull because we know for a fact he got all that anger, that is immensely more important than something as cosmetic as that. Heck one could even argue it makes sense given that he gains the anger without the damage of the hits that come along the way, or that over the years he now tries to act cool in a context like this, it's irrelevant.
That’s not how that starship system works at all
Banner specificly looked hulk’s psyche into the engine room to fuel the starship body. Banner’s emotions don’t affect the actual body of hulk
Once again, you try to make a categorical difference by trying to understand what happens in just 1 hyperspecific way when that's not the case at all. You don't even care about how meaningless it is for Banner to get the anger if not an advantage in power.
considering how the starship was set up,it looks like banner only wanted the data on Thor fights
Fighting smarter also doesn’t mean you’re always going to hit harder either. You can fight smarter by gaining knowledge on your enemy and know what to expect from them to better counter there attacks while also learning about there possible weakness
This is part of the same argument and it's just as terrible.
Why does Banner want to
feel the battles if he "only wanted the data on Thor fights" to gain knowledge? Why feel
every punch? Why do Banner and Hulk scream in the same way? Because it's bullsh*t that knowledge only wanted the data on Thor fights for knowledge.
So basically, you're saying we are unreliable?
Whose "we" in this context? The people Ant takes "at their word all the time when they say that threads should be closed"? If so then yes. It's general, vague, and there are times I speculate it to be a tactic.
If it's certain people here specifically, I guess so in the sense that my arguments weren't over and it would have been a mess to find the new thread, mobilize the arguments, and even adapt to whatevery other topics the new thread talks about. I'm fresh on this now, thanks. I wouldn't say "you made this mistake, therefore you're unreliable", just "you made this mistake", or even "you made this mistake, that was an unreliable thing to do".
And ngl, most of your arguments seem to be baseless headcanon like the one with infinite dimensions and with the hulk.
What I get from this is that I don't know if you know what a headcanon is. On that feat, I go over semantics, + something proven in the comic itself. A headcanon is something that a fan imagines to be true about a story even though no information supporting that exists. I could hypothetically be wrong, but I wouldn't be using a headcanon.
I still can't say anything on Maverick Zero X disagreeing w/o replying to my comments since I still don't know how & why they disagree.
Maybe they agree with The one you least expect, since the latter argues against what I say, but I find very hard to believe siding with what they say.