- 1,744
- 1,165
Not to mention that Katakuri foresaw Big Father attacking Big mom (Big father is an inanimate object) and foresaw a cake "falling", mind you cakes doesn't have a soul and are fundamentally inanimate objects.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, when you said: "By monsters, invisible beings and "Sillhoutes", Rayleigh refers to any being that's living on One piece, otherwise he would've told Luffy that there exist things he cannot sense. For example "invisible beings"."In the one piece world, invisibility has many meanings such as erasing one's presence, turning himself invisible and creatures beyond anyone's comprehension.
Why should he tell everything to Luffy, a headstrong young up-start, who, like many others, seeks to conquer the Grand Line?Rayleigh conquered every island, every country and discovered the biggest mystery of the One piece's world. Rayleigh is Roger's right hand, automatically a reliable source. Why would Rayleigh lie or half-heartedly explaining things to Luffy? Rayleigh has faced countless of DF users & mysterious creatures, him telling that observation haki grants him to sense beings that don't have a soul or are invisible beings is accepted here. So going by the Wiki's rules, Sanji can indeed sense Meta, so honestly why is that a debate in the first place?
Ah, this text, right?: "Other users can also perform active precognition--seeing events transpiring at least several seconds before they occur."Every Advanced Kenbunshoku Haki can do that. Otherwise Sanji wouldn't be classified as "Advanced Kenbunshoku Haki user" in the first place, the proof you are asking is literally written on his profile picture and Haki page. Since it's confirmed by Oda that Sanji's Kenbunshoku Haki is comparable to cough Katakuri, pretty self-explanatory if you have watched whole cake arc or Luffy vs Katakuri.
If a Pacifista is part human, a Pacifista is still partially organic, & presumably, has life force, doesn't it? I vaguely remember something about Bartholomew Kuma's influence gradually fading from one, but....Don’t know what going on but Kenbunshoku Haki can be used on inanimate objects as shown when Luffy could predict the movements of a Pacifista, a cyborg/human weapon (Chapter 601), and Koby could use it to sense a torpedo heading straight at a ship (Chapter 903).
I'd assume Big Father is an animated inanimate object via Devil Fruit powers, based on what I remember reading. Thank you for the cake example, however.Not to mention that Katakuri foresaw Big Father attacking Big mom (Big father is an inanimate object) and foresaw a cake "falling", mind you cakes doesn't have a soul and are fundamentally inanimate objects.
No, they are entirely robotic who have their design based on KumaIf a Pacifista is part human, a Pacifista is still partially organic, & presumably, has life force, doesn't it? I vaguely remember something about Bartholomew Kuma's influence gradually fading from one, but....
If they are entirely robotic, why did you say "a cyborg/human weapon"??No, they are entirely robotic who have their design based on Kuma
Am I mistaken, or didn't she animate things like clouds?Irrc Big Mom cannot add souls into beings that already have a soul. But she can make animals become homies. Does this mean that animals in OP don't have a soul? Thinking about it now is very interesting.
Almost anything is possible in the Grandline, especially if DF users are involved and other things. Considering that DFs are consistently portrayed as being "natural phenomenon", we don't have any reason not to believe that Perona's ghosts aren't real ghosts (except you can see them) but are proven to be Intangible. Since the negative hollow (horror? Or hollow) and those doesn't seem to have a soul.Why should he tell everything to Luffy, a headstrong young up-start, who, like many others, seeks to conquer the Grand Line?
& are you saying those "invisible" beings are confirmed as having no Souls?
But ARE there Soulless beings Rayleigh could have reasonably encountered in his travels through the Grand Line?
I don't think that we can just assume something unprecedented simply exists & was
Many would consider a ghost itself a soul. I think that whether or not Rayleigh encountered Perona's DF himself is debatable, I'd say. Aren't DF supposed to be unique?Almost anything is possible in the Grandline, especially if DF users are involved and other things. Considering that DFs are consistently portrayed as being "natural phenomenon", we don't have any reason not to believe that Perona's ghosts aren't real ghosts (except you can see them) but are proven to be Intangible. Since the negative hollow (horror? Or hollow) and those doesn't seem to have a soul.
Animals as well.Am I mistaken, or didn't she animate things like clouds?
Not technically. DF users are ultimately "vessels". If the vessel dies, the DF teleports elsewhere (randomly), somewhere in a country or island.Many would consider a ghost itself a soul. I think that whether or not Rayleigh encountered Perona's DF himself is debatable, I'd say. Aren't DF supposed to be unique?
That wording ("the Gomu Gumu no mi", for one.) still sounds like it's implying there's only one Gomu Gumu no Mi fruit, it just reappears after the current user dies.Not technically. DF users are ultimately "vessels". If the vessel dies, the DF teleports elsewhere (randomly), somewhere in a country or island.
In other words, you are the user of the Gomu Gomu no mi, and dies at an accident or gets killed by a Magma guy with anger management issues. Someone who's incredibly lucky finds the Gomu Gomu no mi by chance and becomes the new user of the Gomu Gomu no mi.
My concern is with animating clouds. Many could readily believing animals have souls.
Yep. There exist only one Gomu Gomu no mi, just like every DF as well. If you dies and you are presumably a DF user, the fruit reappears somewhere in the world (completely uneaten tho)That wording ("the Gomu Gumu no mi", for one.) still sounds like it's implying there's only one Gomu Gumu no Mi fruit, it just reappears after the current user dies
I'd sure hope it doesn't reappear partially eaten, lol.Yep. There exist only one Gomu Gomu no mi, just like every DF as well. If you dies and you are presumably a DF user, the fruit reappears somewhere in the world (completely uneaten tho)
Nah. Perona wasn't born when Roger was still a rookie, it's not strange to assume that they met the previous user of Perona's DF. Similarly how they met the previous user of Bartolomeo's DF and Mr.2's DF, as well as many others too. I think the fact that she obtained the fruit means the previous user of her fruit died.I'd sure hope it doesn't reappear partially eaten, lol.
But given there is usually only 1 Devil Fruit of each kind, & given how out of the way & impractical Thriller Bark is, I'd be a little surprised if Rayleigh encountered Perona's DF, especially while she was still the user of it.
Her ability doesn't require the body to have a pre-existing soul, it actually adds the soul to an inanimated body to animate it. The belief that animals have souls is relative, and metaphysical concepts can have various functions within their own verses than we are generally used to (The "Shadow" in One Piece works as a second soul for example).If her DF ability requires something have a pre-existing soul to be affected, that would imply clouds in One Piece have souls, no?
If you say so. Might be a bit NLF to assume they found/met users of all the fruits, or that even all the fruits had users at the time.Nah. Perona wasn't born when Roger was still a rookie, it's not strange to assume that they met the previous user of Perona's DF. Similarly how they met the previous user of Bartolomeo's DF and Mr.2's DF, as well as many others too. I think the fact that she obtained the fruit means the previous user of her fruit died.
After all, the possibility is still there. Since there isn't a single island left that the Roger's pirates didn't conquered (stealing gold, playing pranks and bullying the gold ol' whitebeard).
NopeYes, but it's not specified that they're facing towards one another, right?
Mb I forgotDidn't OP specify that they have prior knowledge? What would be the point of granting prior knowledge if it granted them no knowledge at all?