Because you’re needlessly complicating that? We can classify it as INV Negation. Sans is the only monster to dodge Frisk’s attacks, but we do no give him 4th Wall break for that, we give him high reaction speed (and eventually IA). Sans is the only monster to ignore Frisk’s durability, but we do not give him 4th Wall Break due to that, we give him Durability Negation. Same thing here.
No? The verse blatantly shows that ignoring durability does not equate of negating invulnerability. I used MTT for a reason.
What argument is even this? He has durability negation for constantly dealing Frisk 1 damage despite them having far higher DEF (99 DEF with Heart-locket), INV stuff has nothing to do with its justification.
Every monster can do that? That's the entire basis behind their "Limited Durability Negation"? That they always deal at least 1 damage.
No? They have it because against the guy with the same tier, they would need attack their SOUL and ignore conventional durability. It was established long time ago that monsters’ soul manipulation is bound to the opponent’s physicals, as physical armor increases DEF of the SOUL.
It nullifies only Invulnerability. Negation always links to Powernull. Hence why Invulnerability Negation. Lol.
We see that Frisk’s INV is not working in the fight either, lol.
Both explicitly work differently in the fight
Check any Hazbin Hotel profile
It does. It’s straight up called so and has its properties
1) I hate this type of sarcasm. It makes me mad. We both know I never agreed;
Not quite we need an in universe explanation why it makes them invulnerable and no just having a quote saying they are invulnerable doesn't count.
Frisk gets Invulnurability for their SOUL when they get hit: the attacks that have just attacked them will make no damage before this temporal INV is gone. Unless you want to say that they have temporary Statistics Amplification (when it is straight up called Invulnerability LMAO)
Because in his case he’s straight up far more durable. ******* 255 DEF and it says that his metal body is what makes him invulnerable. False equivalence.
It wouldn't be the first time a video game character would lose invulnerability to our standards and honesty that is basically what we did to mario.
And INV's case, Frisk just phases through attacks, which doesn't at all fit what Invulnerability is supposed to be.
Actually, actually…
Do.....do they? Iirc the attacks just....vanishes, after hitting them
The original attack that hits Frisk just vanishes, but other just go through and make no damage
That's uh.... that's something.
Check my other concerns plz.
Frisk who did not give a shit about killing Toriel or Papyrus, hunted for many monsters just for the sake of killing is now feeling guilty? C’mon now. Although it’s not really KARMA effect, we see this text even in no-hit.
Mettaton has Dura Neg and does not negate Frisk’s Invulnerability. But Frisk’s INV is not really Invulnerability anyways, it’s just becoming intangible.
It's because of them knowing that they have no consequence anyway due to whatever they do being washed away from the RESETs.
True.
This hurt's Sans' thing even more. But besides that, it's because Frisk's INV triggers after being hit, MTT's thing works because it's a single attack, hence why INV does not trigger.
Not only this does not attack my point at all, it’s not correct either: Frisk’s mindset is completely broken on Genocide, Toriel literally states that Frisk HATES them, monsters don’t recognize human in him (aka analogue on “humanity”). Genocide Frisk is a murdered who hunts enemies in the corners just to clear locations. They enjoy punching the dummy.
INV animation and sound is seen against MTT but not Sans. But INV doesn’t work simply because Sans’ attacks are intangible.
She's wrong for the reasons I said above.
What about it's a metaphor, lol? Frisk gets that even if they fight him again.
“Undyne is wrong” first and now “Toriel is wrong”? Seriously?
Yeah so it’s just his ability to make his opponent feel guilty.
Yes. They're ignorant unlike us, the Player.
Repeating urself won't help lil bro.
You still haven’t provided a proof to your claim at all. We have in-game explanations that Frisk hates Toriel, they don’t give a shit about Papyrus’ puzzles, they hunt all the monsters in every corner to kill them, they kill Papyrus and don’t care at all about his last words, they simply use Monster Kid to get on the cliff, nobody sees anything humane in Frisk. Textbook definition of maniac if you ask me.
The invulnerability page mention about cases such as using soul hax against a person who is invulnerable to any physical damage. This is not valid for every case, for example abilities that ignore durability such as pressure points or internal damage are useless against someone who is invulnerable to all physical attacks.
