• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

General DC Comics Discussion Thread

The usual cosmology with multiple authors, there is nothing unusual or outstanding in this, but for some reason, this problem only applies to the DC universe. And I have never seen any compelling evidence or arguments why this should apply only to her, with the exception of repeated and cliched phrases about the logic and canonicity of another universe, in which there are also contradictions and illogical compositions. If you really want to try to lower the level of cosmology by specifically dividing cosmologies into different authors, then for starters, don't try to pretend that there are no contradictions in other multi-author universes.


This is a favorite theme of people trying to appeal that if something is not indicated in the cosmology of one author, then it does not exist in him. Bleed was not created in DC, and has not been mentioned in past comics, but has always existed as a construct in which universes float. Some of the Endless appeared in later comics, but they also always existed and existed from the very beginning of cosmology, Destiny appeared back in 1972, although Morpheus was invented later, does this deny the existence of Morpheus in parallel with Destiny? Of course not.The problem is not that there are contradictions, but a lack of understanding that the cosmological structure is revealed as more and more recent information is released. By the way, in TES, the entire cosmology as it is at the moment was also not initially thought out, they expanded and changed, which does not prevent it from being compiled into a cosmological level.

Has anything changed much? The heavens appeared and were shown on the map. Pralaya has also appeared in some comics. Lucifer also appeared in Crisis. The fact that a newer one replaced an old one does not in any way cancel the old one. Otherwise, we can throw out all the old appearances of Darkseid and Doomsday, because Darkseid was not previously listed as Platonic Evil, and Doomsday was not a multiversal parasite resurrecting himself in the higher dimensions?

Sandman originally appeared in DC. Destiny appeared in 1972. Here you need to ask a counter question, who is more canonical, Dc, which created Vertigo characters, or Vetrigo, which uses Dc characters? Yahweh or his voice appeared in Pre-Crisis DC. Does this somehow contradict Vertigo? Or will there be some clear and normal evidence that Vertigo really has a different cosmology, different from Dc?

This is a problem with any multi-author work. DC is so far the only universe in which I have seen a division of cosmology, turning a blind eye to other universes with multiple authors.
You haven't given a single argument against the thread. You ignore and don't answer questions. And are you still dissatisfied with something?
You have already offered these complaints, and they weren't accepted with good reason.
 
You have already offered these complaints, and they weren't accepted with good reason.
The application of cosmology based on the author is not very good, because it does not consider the existence of other authors. It's better to put it together but separate what is canon for the main dcu, there are many multiverses and the concept of god in DC is different, because it is not connected directly to the monitor sphere, 5th dimension, then it is only the concept of god within the sphere of the gods.

Dream concepts like JM only exist in the sphere of the gods, not applied to the monitor sphere. The voids in the sphere of the gods also varies. Gods are born in dreaming realm and JM also told about Hindu gods.

Different concepts of creation are normal, almost all gods are creators for their people. There are many gods in the sphere of the gods, such as Buddha, Brahma, Yahweh and others.

The separation of cosmology makes it complicated,like forcing a separation of cosmologies, even though it is not a difficult problem.

Just ask, I will answer every question.
 
The application of cosmology based on the author is not very good, because it does not consider the existence of other authors. It's better to put it together but separate what is canon for the main dcu, there are many multiverses and the concept of god in DC is different, because it is not connected directly to the monitor sphere, 5th dimension, then it is only the concept of god within the sphere of the gods.

Dream concepts like JM only exist in the sphere of the gods, not applied to the monitor sphere. The voids in the sphere of the gods also varies. Gods are born in dreaming realm and JM also told about Hindu gods.
Elizio after the holiday he will create a thread to combined some the continuity other authors such as Alan Moore which will be combined with DeMatteis cosmology and also recently he has combined DC cosmology with every crisis event like C.O.I.E, zero hour, infinite crisis, final crisis, metal event and dark crisis.
 
The application of cosmology based on the author is not very good, because it does not consider the existence of other authors. It's better to put it together but separate what is canon for the main dcu, there are many multiverses and the concept of god in DC is different, because it is not connected directly to the monitor sphere, 5th dimension, then it is only the concept of god within the sphere of the gods.

Dream concepts like JM only exist in the sphere of the gods, not applied to the monitor sphere. The voids in the sphere of the gods also varies. Gods are born in dreaming realm and JM also told about Hindu gods.

Different concepts of creation are normal, almost all gods are creators for their people. There are many gods in the sphere of the gods, such as Buddha, Brahma, Yahweh and others.

The separation of cosmology makes it complicated,like forcing a separation of cosmologies, even though it is not a difficult problem.

Just ask, I will answer every question.
This is a poorly formatted mess of rehashing rejected arguments. "Just ask, I will answer every question" is a display of arrogance.
 
Elizio after the holiday he will create a thread to combined some the continuity other authors such as Alan Moore which will be combined with DeMatteis cosmology and also recently he has combined DC cosmology with every crisis event like C.O.I.E, zero hour, infinite crisis, final crisis, metal event and dark crisis.
Great, I like it
This is a poorly formatted mess of rehashing rejected arguments. "Just ask, I will answer every question" is a display of arrogance.
No, just wondering what makes it uncombinable.
if you use a cosmology blog, it's just a forced thing
 
No, just wondering what makes it uncombinable
Before Elizio has already said that DC cosmology combined with all authors that will really give birth to a lot of contradictions in each comics, even with Morrison's hypertime ideas and the Metaverse it's still not enough to reconcile any existing contradictions so he prefers to separate cosmology with each authors but if that is not satisfactory then splitting the continuity with each event is a suitable one.
 
Before Elizio has already said that DC cosmology combined with all authors that will really give birth to a lot of contradictions in each comics, even with Morrison's hypertime ideas and the Metaverse it's still not enough to reconcile any existing contradictions so he prefers to separate cosmology with each authors but if that is not satisfactory then splitting the continuity with each event is a suitable one.
That's his opinion, 4 Dimensions is not entirely about physics/geometry but also metaphysics
 
Our DC Comics Cosmology page quite extensively details irreconcileable differences between different cosmologies, so we cannot stack them on top of each other just for the purpose of getting as illogically high results as possible.

Also, we have already extensively discussed these issues previously, and cannot continue to do so over and over and over.
 
Elizio after the holiday he will create a thread to combined some the continuity other authors such as Alan Moore which will be combined with DeMatteis cosmology and also recently he has combined DC cosmology with every crisis event like C.O.I.E, zero hour, infinite crisis, final crisis, metal event and dark crisis.
Yep. 😉
 
Like i said, after the holidays, we could focus for the Spiritual Cosmology 👍
No problem for now we can discuss source material for spiritual cosmology after you are done with the holidays, and I would also like to see responses from knowledgeable members and staff regarding the naming spiritual cosmology.
 
No problem for now we can discuss source material for spiritual cosmology after you are done with the holidays, and I would also like to see responses from knowledgeable members and staff regarding the naming spiritual cosmology.
Sure! 😀 We need the maximum of source materials.
 
I do not think that DeMatteis and Alan Moore seem to have the same type of religious worldviews at all. The former is a disciple of Meher Baba, who DeMatteis thinks is an Enlightened being, and the second is a long practitioner of spiritual magic.
Well, I haven't read many of Alan Moore's stories, so I might be wrong, but from what I've read, they seems in line with what DeMatteis established in his stories.
 
I do not think that DeMatteis and Alan Moore seem to have the same type of religious worldviews at all. The former is a disciple of Meher Baba, who DeMatteis thinks is an Enlightened being, and the second is a long practitioner of spiritual magic.
having different views doesn't mean it can't be combined, what's more I also talked about this with Elizio that will also combined vertigo cosmology between pre black label and black label. Moreover on DC Vertigo black label brings material from DeMatteis and Moore such as Sea of Brahma and The Great Darkness.
 
Okay then. I am not sure about this though. Hinduism and dark or grey magic partially based on Christianity seem badly suited for a complete combination.
 
I do not think that DeMatteis and Alan Moore seem to have the same type of religious worldviews at all. The former is a disciple of Meher Baba, who DeMatteis thinks is an Enlightened being, and the second is a long practitioner of spiritual magic.
I share the same thoughts as this. You can find plenty of ways to combine a lot of things in DC. Doesn't mean you should. DeMatteis cosmology is perfectly consistent and fine on it's on. Adding other things only inflates the tiers of those additional works.
 
I share the same thoughts as this. You can find plenty of ways to combine a lot of things in DC. Doesn't mean you should. DeMatteis cosmology is perfectly consistent and fine on it's on. Adding other things only inflates the tiers of those additional works.
I agree with this.
 
Our DC Comics Cosmology page quite extensively details irreconcileable differences between different cosmologies, so we cannot stack them on top of each other just for the purpose of getting as illogically high results as possible.

Also, we have already extensively discussed these issues previously, and cannot continue to do so over and over and over.
You mean like anti-monitor is a creation of TGD? did I see it wrong? Isn't anti-monitor just said to be cursed not created? [Here].
Hecate created the gods didn't the dream? I saw that SOG had existed before and she had gone to a darker place [dark multiverse] [Here]
The voids also vary, yahweh isn't omnipotent either, his plans don't even go beyond the voids, didn't even reach the void yama.
Like i said, after the holidays, we could focus for the Spiritual Cosmology 👍
Spirituality is only in the sphere of the gods, that is where the gods of various beliefs are located.Here
why not put it easily in the sphere of the gods but scale it under the limbo?
I do not think that DeMatteis and Alan Moore seem to have the same type of religious worldviews at all. The former is a disciple of Meher Baba, who DeMatteis thinks is an Enlightened being, and the second is a long practitioner of spiritual magic.
Spiritual/astral plane part of the collective unconscious.
"The crest of the Collective Unconscious lies above the Sphere of the Gods."put that realms above the sphere of the gods
There's nothing complicated actually
 
Last edited:
You mean like anti-monitor is a creation of TGD? did I see it wrong? Isn't anti-monitor just said to be cursed not created? [Here].
Hecate created the gods didn't the dream? I saw that SOG had existed before and she had gone to a darker place [dark multiverse] [Here]
The voids also vary, yahweh isn't omnipotent either, his plans don't even go beyond the voids, didn't even reach the void yama.

Spirituality is only in the sphere of the gods, that is where the gods of various beliefs are located.Here
why not put it easily in the sphere of the gods but scale it under the limbo?

Spiritual/astral plane part of the collective unconscious.
"The crest of the Collective Unconscious lies above the Sphere of the Gods."put that realms above the sphere of the gods
There's nothing complicated actually
You're right about the Anti-Monitor being cursed instead of being created by the Great Darkness. This needs to be changed.

A notable difference between DeMatteis and Crisis Cosmologies, for example, is their view of "God" which seems distinctly different. DeMatteis' vision of God contains and surpasses everything and everyone, including the Primordial Darkness (Pralaya), while in Crisis Cosmology, the Light of Creation (Overvoid/Source/Presence) is preceded by the Great Darkness.
 
Last edited:
Now, one topic we should address is whether or not the people of the Sphere of Gods scale to their realms, or just a few of them.

From Crisis Cosmology, the New Gods transcend conventional time and their presence deforms time. Darkseid's fall casting a shadow over the multiverse is clearly a metaphor not to be taken literally, but his Godhead is a multiversal singularity with no double from other universes, with all evil consolidated into one point.
 
Now, one topic we should address is whether or not the people of the Sphere of Gods scale to their realms, or just a few of them.

From Crisis Cosmology, the New Gods transcend conventional time and their presence deforms time. Darkseid's fall casting a shadow over the multiverse is clearly a metaphor not to be taken literally, but his Godhead is a multiversal singularity with no double from other universes, with all evil consolidated into one point.
It's been a minute since I last read it, but I believe in Justice League Odyssey Darkseid restored and moved Apokolips back into the Sphere of Gods. Think it was issue 23 or 24 of that comic run.
 
It's been a minute since I last read it, but I believe in Justice League Odyssey Darkseid restored and moved Apokolips back into the Sphere of Gods. Think it was issue 23 or 24 of that comic run.
This was not his Godhead though, as his Godhead was only restored after Death Metal when all emanations were absorbed.
 
This was not his Godhead though, as his Godhead was only restored after Death Metal when all emanations were absorbed.
It wasn't so much to say that it was his Godhead. It's more about the fact that he restored the entire thing to its full power and then moved it outside of the multiverse and back into the sphere. Though, there's likely some context I'm forgetting about it all.
 
You're right about the Anti-Monitor being cursed instead of being created by the Great Darkness. This needs to be changed.

A notable difference between DeMatteis and Crisis Cosmologies, for example, is their view of "God" which seems distinctly different. DeMatteis' vision of God contains and surpasses everything and everyone, including the Primordial Darkness (Pralaya), while in Crisis Cosmology, the Light of Creation (Overvoid/Source/Presence) is preceded by the Great Darkness.
Pralaya? She didn't even cause a crisis in the multiverse. She is even defeated by the green [elemental force] and the green is the collective unconscious.
The collective unconscious is part of creation [Here], so it is impossible for Pralaya to be stronger than Perpetua and equate her with TGD.
Here Here
She is just the embodiment of emptiness, while mother night is emptiness itself

Upside down-man > pralaya.

Upside down-man is just a puppet for the great darkness [Here]
Within his dimension his power is so great that, even when empowered by all of the Parliaments working together, the Swamp Thing can only bind him temporarily:
Here Here Here Here Here
And able to kill swamp thing :
Di Sini
So there are no more difficult problems, just put them at the same level as the sphere of the gods
 
Pralaya? She didn't even cause a crisis in the multiverse. She is even defeated by the green [elemental force] and the green is the collective unconscious.
The collective unconscious is part of creation [Here], so it is impossible for Pralaya to be stronger than Perpetua and equate her with TGD.
Here Here
She is just the embodiment of emptiness, while mother night is emptiness itself

Upside down-man > pralaya.

Upside down-man is just a puppet for the great darkness [Here]
Within his dimension his power is so great that, even when empowered by all of the Parliaments working together, the Swamp Thing can only bind him temporarily:
Here Here Here Here Here
And able to kill swamp thing :
Di Sini
So there are no more difficult problems, just put them at the same level as the sphere of the gods
Pralaya extends far above the divine realms. According to DeMatteis' stories, Pralaya is the primordial darkness from which Creation and the Creator himself emerged and to which they would return.
 
It wasn't so much to say that it was his Godhead. It's more about the fact that he restored the entire thing to its full power and then moved it outside of the multiverse and back into the sphere. Though, there's likely some context I'm forgetting about it all.
After the Darkseid War events, Darkseid was reduced to a baby and in the Wonder Woman series, her daughter, Grail, had stolen the energies of several gods, including Hercules, using a Mother Box to give Darkseid the stolen energies in order to restore Darkseid again, which she partially succeeded in doing after Darkseid stole the energies of Zeus. I don't remember if I'm missing something, but at the time of JL Odyssey, Darkseid was still seeking to restore his power.
 
My apologies for interupting, but what do our staff members here think about this?

 
Regardless we should talk about whether or not the inhabitants of the Sphere of the Gods scale to their realms (Low 1-C).
This is gonna be really tacky as the New Gods have just about too many anti-feats, which heck, disqualifies them from being platonic/living thoughts. Although, if they're indeed platonic and have just about the same nature as the realms they inhabit, I frankly see no reason why they shouldn't scale to it. Also, the obvious problem it's mostly the 'top dogs' in these realms who've shown a level of superiority over the mortal plane and not just any inhabitants, as they do have 'civilians', if you will. So, even if they do, it should be for a named few.
 
Pralaya extends far above the divine realms. According to DeMatteis' stories, Pralaya is the primordial darkness from which Creation and the Creator himself emerged and to which they would return.
Pralaya is the embodiment of nothingness its true form is the void of Brahma itself.

Smile=brahman
Brahman is the top of the hierarchy in Hinduism, has no form and all creation comes from him.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahman
The existence of a smile is beyond mahapralaya [the nothingness] [Here].

Location: Patala/underworld
[The underworld has several nations for each religion].
The sea of brahma is located in the underworld [Here] [Here] [Here] [Here] and naraka is a creation of the sea of brahma.
Pralaya was in the underworld [sphere of the gods].
Brahman/god > brahma > pralaya.

TGD > perpetua > monitor sphere > sphere of the gods[ like underworlds] > [Physical realm]
 
Regardless we should talk about whether or not the inhabitants of the Sphere of the Gods scale to their realms (Low 1-C).
Just make it "unknown", I don't even remember if they were able to destroy the new genesis/apocalypse

Darkseid's true form [with amp] is placed the same as the overvoid avatar, namely the source. That means he is equal to yahweh if you agree
 
Back
Top