• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Gem Warship dura scaling questions

No point in bumping unless you want to discuss Lapis having weather manip, another 6-B feat was found as well as other tier 6 feats
 
No, Assalt explained why the sun feat is High 6-C as the method which made it 8-A we no longer use

Garnet has a 6-B feat and pearl calls a weapon with 6-B durability fragile
 
It did but now the method used there has been called into question

But there's not only the Gem warship, but a 6-B feat from the comics to support them being 6-B, on top of Garnet being able to survive in the core of the sun
 
I don't see anywhere Assalt explaining that after Kepekly and Darkanine explainned.

Was it stated on this thread?(Before your comment I mean)
 
Assaltwaffle said:
Looks like they're right.

If what I'm seeing is correct then above 6,900 Kelvin emissivity is, at minimum, at 0.92 or above then an average man in the center of the Sun would need to tank 5.018x10^20 watts of energy since an average male body covers 1.9 m^2.

Emissivity only goes up past 6,900 and 15,000,000 is well... way past that, and Garnet is a lot larger than an average man. So 5.018x10^20 joules, or 119.933 gigatons of TNT, is a lowball for Garnet's durability. High 6-C
Darkanine said:
Yeah, the body absorption thing was an old standard we almost universally stopped using.
@Sans
 
Paulo.junior.969 said:
So, did the gems survive that or something? I don't read the comics.
Garnet was able to interact with it and was undamaged and nearly destroyed it twice and Pearl stated that it was fragile
 
Back
Top