- 9,978
- 2,015
Yeah, besides the "feat" not qualify as real black hole: a) it do not justify any other tier 6 feat, and b) do not scale to no one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No the statement was literally that she could survive a dip in the core of the sunDarkanine said:Wasn't Garnet's statement that she can survive a pool as hot as the core of the sun though?
Dunno, i think Kep or Matt told me it was tier 6 but im not sure, i just know i was told thisAssaltwaffle said:@Weekly
I have always wondered why that was so low. You think being at the core of something creating a billion nuclear fusions a second would be way more than T8.
That's a good feat for Garnet actually. Where is this new Sun calc?
Same reason why I'm iffy with the feat too. Even crappy Gem warships are consistently shown to be FTL and beyond. It's the same reason why Celestia isnt 4-B anymore; there are instances of her sun movement not being FTL but it's so consistently FTL that we consider the low ends to be inconsistent.Antoniofer said:To be fair, the Roaming Eye feat is in conflict since Weekly is trying to bump it to ftl speed, making the calculation wrong.
The Warship doesnt use any shields and it makes no sense for one side of a wall to be less durable than the otherJinx666 said:@Weekly.
Yes, she survived the explosion, but the fact it blew up the Warship from inside, which would debateably be more destructive with more energy focused in the points, and the higher pressure. Theres no way to say the inside is as durable as the outside. either.