- 4,534
- 3,790
The « Single will » logic is more than enough for a Possibly rating.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Four Knights of the Apocalypse/Nanatsu no Taizai Main Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Zezu1995
- Start date
-
- Tags
- nanatsu no taizai
- 4,534
- 3,790
Which is really mid.
The Low 5-B calc might be our chance to get something correct even if lowballed…
- 4,964
- 4,426
I don't got faith in that low 5-b calc negl
- 4,534
- 3,790
You should have faith it’s using factual elements.
CGM’s saying they disagree without even looking at the context won’t change a thing to it.
We have range.
We have luminosity.
It’s correct maths wise.
Correct context wise.
NNT is Low 5-B.
- 4,964
- 4,426
The context is still widely debatable. I'm very neutral on this and it would also most likely get shot down and be deemed an outlier by some others
I want it to go through but if you can convince Mr Bambu then you're goated
speedster352
He/Him- 17,544
- 1,788
How’s life? I do apologize but I would really like to know about the completion of the four knights profiles. Also you forgot to update the verse notes because this are still 6c
speedster352
He/Him- 17,544
- 1,788
Not to sound callous or anything but is it really that hard to make 4 profiles?
- 4,534
- 3,790
How is the context debatable when everything is stated ?
He won’t respond anymore
even though I bumped my message on his wall
- 22,345
- 18,530
It's not, I just have a billion other things going on and want to prioritise quality.
Now, please stop.
speedster352
He/Him- 17,544
- 1,788
I have a proposition if you open the profiles I can make the changes from the nnt crt 3.5 that way you won't have to worry about it. It's a win-win
speedster352
He/Him- 17,544
- 1,788
That was rude also it's just some small edits I can manage I mean I made 6 sandboxes by myself
- 22,345
- 18,530
It wasn't intended to be rude. I'm just saying you need to learn a bit more about editing, especially since profiles now require referencing and many of the affected profiles have tabbers.
I'm sorry, but those sandboxes are what I was referencing when I said your editing work probably isn't good enough to go on the profiles. They have lots of basic coding errors.
I'm sorry, but those sandboxes are what I was referencing when I said your editing work probably isn't good enough to go on the profiles. They have lots of basic coding errors.
Last edited:
speedster352
He/Him- 17,544
- 1,788
Fine, let's get deceived to do them he is the expert(in my opinion) Also aren't you going to fix my sandboxes and make them profiles?
- 22,345
- 18,530
I said I'd eventually fix the formatting. There's weird stats that I don't know shit about.
Given that you haven't edited it since the beginning of this month, maybe do some editing yourself, like switching everything to the ratings that are currently on the profile (i.e, Small Country level+ instead of Island level+).
Given that you haven't edited it since the beginning of this month, maybe do some editing yourself, like switching everything to the ratings that are currently on the profile (i.e, Small Country level+ instead of Island level+).
Last edited:
Demon_Lord18
He/Him- 1,554
- 660
Real
Demon_Lord18
He/Him- 1,554
- 660
How's life? Have you profiled the 4 horsemen of the apocalypse, discovered the cure for cancer, AIDS, calculated the pixels in my house, fed my cat and become a billionaire?
- 10,760
- 16,024
Also did you find new abilities as well recalculated every feat from BoS SDS to 4KotA. Solve world hunger, global warming, world peace, sustainable energy, walked the dog, watered the plants, cut the grass, do the laundry, clean the house, etc?
- 4,964
- 4,426
- 10,760
- 16,024
- 4,534
- 3,790
They don’t… which is really sad
Demon_Lord18
He/Him- 1,554
- 660
Serious question, couldn't we scale Chaos Low 2-C or 3-A (anything above the current value) via that Cath quote where he says he's going to destroy everything? like, he is the destructive will of Chaos and that would only escalate to Chaos in his true form and Arthur with complete Chaos, since right after saying that he would destroy everything Cath asked what Arthur would do with the power of Chaos, implying that he could only destroy everything with the power of complete Chaos
- 4,534
- 3,790
Dude they won’t even accept 5-B Chaos but you think they’ll accept Low 2-C Cath ?
- 22,345
- 18,530
Going by the previous discussion, it seems like most people concluded that Cath's statement wasn't specific enough in terms of timeframe and could have been hyperbole.
Since it's a goal, I wouldn't call it hyperbole, but it's true that nothing suggests it'd be quick.
Since it's a goal, I wouldn't call it hyperbole, but it's true that nothing suggests it'd be quick.
Last edited:
- 4,534
- 3,790
Chaos power have interdimensional range meaning Cath would be able to absorb the entirety of the forms of the multiple dimensions including Purgatory which is infinite.
Meaning we could argue for it needing 0 timeframe to actually be used.
Also she would’ve absorbed everything which basically mean absorbing the energy of basically everything.
- 1,313
- 1,057
"Destroying anything that has form" Seems just part of his chaos manipulation, cause as far i know chaos manipulation also can work in that way
- 4,534
- 3,790
I don’t remember it being rejected.
The only argument I can remember was « The cover panel was fake the true panel doesn’t even have the text on it »
Though we found a paper version that has the statement written on it.
Chapter 269 on the cover.
- 4,964
- 4,426
8-B Cath take it or take it
- 4,534
- 3,790
They are « wandering round and round in the endless underworld » is what is said
Cath stated that she could destroy any form while starting to eat Arthur and co
Arthur then used the same exact technique and ate Cath absorbing his powers and the missing Chaos fragment.
- 22,345
- 18,530
Ok, then.
That's not what happened, and requires massive jumps to conclusions. Athur already started devouring him, and then Arthur asked Cath what their intentions were with Chaos' full power. Cath didn't ever have Chaos' full power, so it isn't the 'same exact technique'.
That's not what happened, and requires massive jumps to conclusions. Athur already started devouring him, and then Arthur asked Cath what their intentions were with Chaos' full power. Cath didn't ever have Chaos' full power, so it isn't the 'same exact technique'.
- 4,534
- 3,790
The statement is occurring while both are using their absorption hence why I was assuming it was through absorption.
It would scale to Arthur since he’s got Chaos Full power.
- 4,534
- 3,790
Wouldn’t Chaos at full power still get the rating and range for being able one way or another to destroy every form on an interdimensional scale.
Similar threads
