F**k this i will do it now!! forgive me!!

[Kisaragi_Megumi]

Well,firstly forgive me Kaltias and SD,i can't holding back to create this match,and secondly after this done i will stopping for a while again.

UKG and 5-A Necro lizard is used,bloodlusted,speed equalized,and SBA comes to play.





VS


Who would win!!?

• UKG : 0

• Necro-Lizard : 0

Now excuse me,i must take a bath with holy water now....*goes away*

 

[ShiroyashaGinSan]

It matters how potent SCP's RE is. Waiting for someone to input.

 

[MrKingOfNegativity]

 

[WeeklyBattles]

This is essentially going to end up exactly like 682 vs Homura, im almost tempted to just close this now

 

[Kisaragi_Megumi]

@Weekly

Hold up there lucifer,let me see whats going on next.

 

[Kaltias]

I mean.

Either UKG curbs because she can win and 682 can't even affect her,

Or the match is inconclusive because she keeps stomping 682 until the end of times.

There is no actual debate either way

 

[Sir_Ovens]

Lizard can't die, be BFRed, or erased. This goes on forever.

>thread

 

[Kaltias]

>Lizard can't be erased

Are you sure?

 

[Sir_Ovens]

I can still taste the salt from that thread.

But unless Krispy Grapefruit has 1-B level existence erasure, my point still stands.

 

[Kaltias]

? You don't need 1-B erasure unless 682 is unrestricted

 

[Sir_Ovens]

Immortality is restricted. The fact that it's a 3D shell controlled by a higher dimensional dragon isn't.

You can't destroy the shell completely without killing the host, whom happens to be 1-B.

 

[Homu_Sweet_Homu]

Do they allowed to grow?

 

[Kaltias]

It is restricted.

It's exactly the stuff that gets restricted all the freaking time.

Is it higher dimensional interference that makes you unkillable? Yes.

So it's restricted

 

[Homu_Sweet_Homu]

Higher D type 4, 8, and 9.

 

[Sir_Ovens]

So what feats are acceptable here? Because some of the stuff 682 has pulled off was because it was a 1-B trapped in a 3D body.

 

[Kaltias]

The stuff that it can do without 1-B shenanigans.

But if you really want to debate that:

1) UKG's curse hax grows alongside her powers so she corrupts 682 eventually

2) 682 never took conceptual erasure and survived so

3) UKG makes a law saying "you are not allowed to exist" and 682 follows it

4) His acausality has nothing to do with causality manipulation, so she rewrites cause and effect to prevent his existence

Meanwhile 682 can't even affect her

A tad unfair, no?

 

[WeeklyBattles]

> His acausality has nothing to do with causality manipulation, so she rewrites cause and effect to prevent his existence

? His acausality comes from ressting the effects of an SCP that completely rewrites the past and history of whatever comes in contact with it, how does that have nothing to do with causality?

 

[Kaltias]

Because that's textbook resistance to paradoxes?

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Since when?

 

[Schnee_One]

Can we please quit it with these obnoxious titles? More importantly can we please quit thinking about the titles name and more about if the match we make is actually good?

 

[Kaltias]

Since it's changing 682's past to change its present.

Which is trying to paradox his current self into something different

 

[Schnee_One]

Question

Can you close this before we inevitably get into the 1B essence bullshit again? Better for both you and me.

 

[Newendigo]

Threads like this are the reason to why I don't get along with haxxed characters.

Haxless ones are more interesting to debate honestly.