- 20,509
- 1,590
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's not existent, he still has a fate. We discussed that.Again how will she kill him if he isnt really alive? Will he even be effected by the visions?
It's clearly not just with sight.Can instill fear and madness to those who look upon it or with its presence
Yeah but presence doesn't mean it can be felt from anywhere. You'd need proof that it would hit people 4km away.It's clearly not just with sight.
Abstract Existence (Type 1; Grimm was born from the feelings of the Grand Prince, hence why it desires the feelings and wishes of people. Grimm is also a mathematical equation that can control and warp physics as it was created by the Phenomenon Equation Experiment, an experiment which intended to create an equation that can warp and control physics. And Grimm is an illusion that even appears in the dreams of everyone in Inganock)
Well, being non-existent doesn't mean you can't die. Not to mention you're completely under Edel's control if she manages to damage you (which causality will).Again that doesn’t mean he will care much for the visions, since he isn’t truly alive.
So he should be able to get into range before she kills him. Which she honestly can’t.
That's less abstract existence and more non-corporeality. He doesn't embody dreams, he just is a dream.Plus theirs this.
Resistance to death manip isn't a factor, this is fate. But even assuming he won't die he'll still be under Edel's control. And why would she enter his range?Immortality Type 5 and Death Manipulation resistance mean he won't die, plus as mentioned Edelweiss will be affected by his Passives when she enters his presence.
She can still place him under causality control.In this case it kinda does since he isn’t truly alive. I don’t see how Edel can kill something that is a mere dream, not even alive in the first place.
This is just stupid when 1 argument was completely skipped over.as the opposition has no convinced me of any of their counter-arguments
This is textbook abstract existence. Dreams are very abstract things, and being one means you're an abstraction.That's less abstract existence and more non-corporeality. He doesn't embody dreams, he just is a dream.
She can just materialize that fate then. Grimm's fate of death which Gii caused.The main character had powers that could defeat him, but Edel doesn't.
I mean at that point it starts to make you wonder where Non-corporeal ends and abstract Existence begins. Wait, i could have swore the Seinshinkan ppl were called non corporeal at some point.This is textbook abstract existence. Dreams are very abstract things, and being one means you're an abstraction.
Not all AE is embodying a concept.
Edel can not reach Homulilly so no. AoC at most.Is Edel going to challenge Puella for 3rd place?
Yeah she may actually.Is Edel going to challenge Puella for 3rd place?
Not really, you are a dream, doesn't mean you embody "dreams". It's like saying "you are made of matter" is = "embodying matter".Embody by definition is to "be an expression of or give a tangible or visible form to (an idea, quality, or feeling)." according to the dictionary. If you are a dream then you're an embodiment of said dream which is an abstract. Grimm is a dream thus he embodies it pretty well.
You are not the expression/representation of matter even if you're made of it. But this is off-topic, since you're using semantics on what 'embody' means.Not really, you are a dream, doesn't mean you embody "dreams". It's like saying "you are made of matter" is = "embodying matter".
Neither is a dude who is a dream. Being a dream doesn't mean you are the representation of dreams.You are not the expression/representation of matter even if you're made of it.
No i am just using brain cells and reading what being AE is on it's literal description on the ability page. Instead of slapping it on random shit.Abstract Existence is by definition of it's name, is to exist as an abstract. That's what Grimm=Grimm is, an abstract, you're over complicating AE with random semantics.
I just LOVE this argument. This is always what ppl use when they're using something that comes outta freaking nowhere. Like "oh i know that word doesn't mean what i want it to mean so arguing for the right definition is semantics cus i wanna use the wrong definition". With these arguments it absolutely peaks.But this is off-topic, since you're using semantics on what 'embody' means.
But without overcomplicating stuff, being that kind of existence (whether you call it AE or NC), doesn't mean you lack fate. Cus he can still act and affect reality.
her fate hax need to affect directly the abstraction itself,I mean,the physical body which act and affect reality is not the true form of abstract existence being,it is only an avatar of itBut without overcomplicating stuff, being that kind of existence (whether you call it AE or NC), doesn't mean you lack fate. Cus he can still act and affect reality.