- 2,721
- 3,520
there are literally three 3-A downgrade threads LINKED in the responses, pein literally participated in them and he is still derailing
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Dragon Ball Super Discussion Thread 100
- Thread starter Warren_Valion
- Start date
Serlock_Holmes
He/Him- 3,651
- 1,554
Yeah but which thread accepted 2-C macrocosm? Just link this. Deagonx makes sense as long as you don't show the thread.
- 624
- 471
I gotta ask, who tf appointed him as a mod?
Serlock_Holmes
He/Him- 3,651
- 1,554
Isn't this good enough?
- 2,721
- 3,520
Serlock_Holmes
He/Him- 3,651
- 1,554
I do feel like it would give more credit to our case if there is a link in the thread with the crt where separate time-axis were accepted.
Serlock_Holmes
He/Him- 3,651
- 1,554
Toeiverse Cosmology Blog
vsbattles.fandom.com
That's what I found but I fear the gt part will soon be shot down.
Conclusions:
The Living Realm
Last edited:
- 3,513
- 5,234
I’ll add the broly stuff eventually since that proves the dimensional barriers separate things spatiotemporallyToeiverse Cosmology Blog
That's what I found but I fear the gt part will soon be shot down.
Conclusions:
The Living Realmis stated to be infinite in size, mirrors/is based off our universe, and is often referred to as the universe itself, with Super confirming that it on it's own is "Universe 7". This along with the other realms also being infinite in size and considered other separate dimensions from Universe 7 itself. For our standards for Universes this alone is enough to warrant the macrocosm as a multiverse and each realm being individual Low 2-C structures including the Kaioshin Realm.
Serlock_Holmes
He/Him- 3,651
- 1,554
Enrich that ducker up.
Eden_Warlock99
She/Her- 10,516
- 3,997
- 12,456
- 4,480
That is not what was disagreed upon tho?
- 10,541
- 12,358
Serlock_Holmes
He/Him- 3,651
- 1,554
And will still be considered an outlier.
- 624
- 471
Delete the verse
Fezzih_007
He/Him- 7,776
- 2,893
You already made that joke.
- 624
- 471
I am not joking
- 5,410
- 6,217
Never let you cook.
Fezzih_007
He/Him- 7,776
- 2,893
Serlock_Holmes
He/Him- 3,651
- 1,554
Umm did we mess up in the staff discussion thread?
- 2,721
- 3,520
No we didn't
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,350
- 4,197
PROVE TIME FLOWS SIDEWAYS OR RIOT
Serlock_Holmes
He/Him- 3,651
- 1,554
We seem to have based this thing on time space continuums which they say is different than the time axis.
- 2,721
- 3,520
KLOL comment was kind of just not addressing anything tbh, it seems like he was just speaking in general. And an axis is just a direction, time is always going to be assumed to flow forward, which is why its applied to any dimensions, which is where, "there is only 1 axis" comes from. He keeps on asking for proof that there is an additional timeline that captures the multiverses when we have a note on zeno's page, multiple scans that imply and pretty much just state its the case anyway. And pein has still not addressed where the standards say time can't flow forward for higher temporal dimensions lmao.
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,350
- 4,197
Sounds made up
- 2,721
- 3,520
There is only 1 axis of time, in the sense that they all flow forward. But there can still be additional temporal dimensions that also flow forward. It's just gonna capture 4d objects instead of 3d objects, in the way its constructed. Pein is just making stuff up.
- 3,070
- 4,193
Erm, you guys are still bound by the flow of time, cringe
Serlock_Holmes
He/Him- 3,651
- 1,554
I really appreciate the fact that we can have input on that. Hey guys a new thread popped up for the feat on calc group discussion. None of us can participate though.
Thread is currently happening.
Tanin_iver
He/Him- 605
- 637
Yes, u guys messed it up a bit. Spatio temporal separation is different from separate time axis. For different space time continuum, they are spatio-temporally separated by being displaced in a higher spatial dimension.
The space times themselves have zero 5D volume but instead they are 4D structures that are displaced in the 5D space.
Copy pasting DT's answer:
As you can see above, all of the different space times in DB will basically be sharing one time dimension that is t. And all the space times are displaced in the higher spatial dimension which we can just call say w.Spacetime A could be
or in words: The set of all points in 3 dimensions, at any given time, in multiversal position 1 (i.e. 1 is the position in the 5th dimension).
Spacetime B could be
or in words: The set of all points in 3 dimensions, at any given, in multiversal position 2.
These universes are spatially separate. In fact, they are even spatiotemporally separate. There is not a single point in space and time that is simultaneously in A and B. Why is there no such point? Because all points in A have 1 as the fifth coordinate and all points in B have 2 as the fifth coordinate. Being in both would mean to have 1 and 2 as 5th coordinate simultaneously, which is impossible.
And how many dimensions of time have we used? Only one. In our notion only the 4th dimension, which's variable we have used t for, is timelike. The variables x, y and z are the ones for our usual 3 spatial dimensions and the 5th one, that is 1 for A and 2 for B, is the spatial position in the multiverse. Only that one dimension is time. Two spatiotemporally separated timelines, yet only one dimension of time.
The spacetimes will all be placed in some coordinate in w and they will be spatiotemporally separate since they don't occupy any volume in w and are of insignificant size.
Now we can infer from the above that the spacetimes only occupy 3 spatial axis that being x, y, z and one temporal axis or time dimension which is t. Which means the different spacetimes in DB are only 4D.
NOTE: Do remember that I am calling them spacetimes instead of timelines,
because I am only talking about DB's various spacetimes in the cosmology(The realms and Macrocosms). I am not talking about DB's version of timeline yet. So do not misunderstand what I explained above.
Serlock_Holmes
He/Him- 3,651
- 1,554
I understood nothing but thanks for the clarification. I hope the people participating currently will see it.
Vietthai96
He/Him- 10,433
- 15,052
Anyway, just let me handle thing, and, 99% DBS gonna stay the way it is
Serlock_Holmes
He/Him- 3,651
- 1,554
Nah it's probably getting downgraded. Frieza's feat is about to be thrown away for a subpar new feat due to reasons.
Eden_Warlock99
She/Her- 10,516
- 3,997
That's DBZ
Serlock_Holmes
He/Him- 3,651
- 1,554
Talking mostly about the general approach of just taking a newer feat and then taking the low end of it even though it seems to be worse and the low end even worse in this case and claiming there is no problem. I can take downgrade threads. This thing is bullshit though, not a downgrade.
- 624
- 471
I’ll say it again delete the verse off of here. Let this wiki die.
Eden_Warlock99
She/Her- 10,516
- 3,997
High 6-A regular humans would have fixed everything, at least everything from between Original DB to Namek, just sayin
Serlock_Holmes
He/Him- 3,651
- 1,554
But then you have Satan dying to bullets. Also am I correct in thinking you were trolling with the thread?
