Is you accept that the calc is mathematically correct, then we've got nothing further to talk about here, duh.
Now I ask, is THIS a joke? Because it has to be. There is no freaking way you don’t see the issues of using this scene, let alone even pointing them out.
Do you or do you not know of or see the issues of using this scene for calcs? That’s the question, that’s all.
I never said you did. That was not the purpose that remark.
Then go all out. Make every possible downgrade, accurate or not. It just needs to be a downgrade, go for wall level if possible.
Downgrades are healthy only when the tiering isn't proper. The primary reason of this community's existence is finding a verse's tier. Matchups are just fun little things to do after that.
Wall-level Azathoth?
We actually have for the galactic patrol in daizenshuu 7 here, but probably nothing about the extinction bomb
I appreciate his comment but in all honesty it takes just one freaking braincell to realize this scene can’t be used
. This is how I know that anyone claiming to not know about this is being downright disingenuous, they aren’t ignorant.
What part of "This is a topic for Content Revision threads / Calc Group threads" didn't you get from my posts?
Upgrades are also pretty healthy, although verses that get upgraded to above Tier 3 usually end up dead, those tiers are quite big, and unless you got some hax, ya ain't getting any fair fights
True, true, although WWE wouldn't gotten such a big presence here if it weren't for all those matches and tournaments
The fact that you think it being mathematically correct means all further discussion is over for us, when you do not even need those threads to see why this is blatantly wrong.
I never said you did. I asked why you‘d “accept” something that is so obviously wrong, not even question it? Because that’s the job of the calc group thread? Then what does you accepting it mean then? Enlighten me please.
If? So you still can’t see it?
Goku’s page is consistently in the tending section. DB has been above tier 3 for years here, I assure you, your fear of it being dead won’t materialize.
That is…not a reason to dismiss any argument and if someone does that, they’re the ones at fault.
You’re acting like we are would win in a CRT where his agreement/disagreement would have actual power to influence the results of the CRT, unlike here.
I said I'm not interested in discussing it here. As in the general discussion thread of the series. That doesn't mean I don't think that calc should be discussed elsewhere.
Accepting it means that the calc is judged to be mathematically correct and it can be brought up in Content Revision thread or Calc Group threads... It doesn't mean just slap it onto the profile without further discussion or evaluation.
"If" as in I'm not casting judgement on that yet. I've got no reason to yet.
You can bring this up in the CRT is my point. I never said I agree or disagree with the sentiment, I'm saying getting snippy with a mod won't change their mind. And since he's a mod, he has power, it's just shooting yourself in the foot in the long term. I'm not dismissing anything, I promise.
I don’t see a rule anywhere stating that discussion for calcs in general threads isn’t allowed but okay
So, if I’m getting this right, the only requirement to earn your approval for a calc is for it be mathematically valid, correct?
Not my point. Of course you believe it’s accurate, that’s why anyone would agree or disagree with a thread, they think it’s accurate, but that’s not what I was pointing towards.
Again, not my point.
I never expected them too, I’d be a fool to even think otherwise.
I never said it was a rule or that other people are forbidden from discussing it. I said I wasn't interested in it.
That's it in a nutshell. Calc Group members look for errors and whether methods are being used correctly. There's not a lot of point in holding a huge debate in the comments of a calc blog.
I haven't put name in supporter sections for verses for years, probably. I don't think that the concept of supporters/neutrals/opponents hold a lot of merit. I love Dragon Ball as a series and I "support" it as a verse by being active in the revisions for it. That doesn't mean I blindly approve everything that comes up up for it.
wut
Fried rice
Idk man but that looks kinda good. All you need is some soy sauce to dip it in.
Fried rice
And maybe Zamasu.
I doubt it. We would’ve given him 36U 2-C if we allowed him to scale but we don’t.
At least in range we should. The fact that Zeno decided to erase everything also and that he was leaking to a different timeline. Damn Zamasu really was the haxy bad of dragonball.
yeah, but.......i still don't know if the number applies to speed as well, i am waiting for @Nullflowerblush thread on the grade 3 multiplier based cell saga re scaling thread to end to start applying the multipliers in a thread
Should't it apply due to the overall increase in speed shown by Goku?
That just seems like a feat for Zeno. His rather casual attack, which he seems to do without thinking much, vaped an entire timeline. I don’t know if leaking into another timeline would grant him range either.
Aren’t speed upgrades complete?
not really, it would raise speed either way for the 50x of the super saiyan, however since the grade 3 500x one is a pure AP/strenght multiplier, i don't know if it would apply to speed at all, at least, @Nullflowerblush isn't applying it to speed, so i prefer waiting for his thread to end so that i can be sure of things
new multipliers
Before that, I am going to need to go through a Frieza recalculation acception thread.
Why does the Wiki consider that an energy attack and not, like, his Existence Erasure ability?
