- 1,577
- 350
He did say that because fits the empathic manipulation page and Earl that's is already concluded, so move to next topic
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's already concluded
LMAO! Yeah, no.Dargoo didn't even check the scan and just talked about "if an emotional power is vague"
Might be better to just call it "Empathic Manipulation" to cover all potential bases. Usually works when an emotional power is a bit vague in application/description.
execpt he didnt? he had at least mid regen feats prior (comparable demons have high-mid feats btw) so. his regen should cover losing limbs disembowelment etc... he even states that dante's weapons were useless against him, if he had known his regen was less than high-mid why would he state this? also the negation is probably not passive. he has to activate it first. and here is the fight with sidThat's not Regeneration Negation, people on this site really need to learn what that is. If it were regeneration negation then by the first slash the Demons wouldn't have been able to regenerate.
What he did do is overpower the regeneration, going by your scans that's lower levels of regeneration, Dante simply overpowered it by causing my damage than the Demon could regenerate from. Regeneration Negation is what Meliodas does via Hellfire, which outright stops the regeneration in it's tracks as opposed to damaging them beyond repair like what Dante does.
Does anyone have the Sid fight on stand by? Because even with that I think the Regeneration Negation is iffy.
Was this not "in base form after gaining the power of agrosax" though?third, Sid did the low-high regen feat while in base form
No cus some of them very clearly lack these traits.second, yes we can scale via their physiology,
1- way to ignore my point thereNo, no no. Sir this wiki doesn't remotely work that way, not sure how long you've been present here but saying "I'm pretty sure." isn't a form of actual argument.
Firstly, once again that scan is irrelevant to the topic I'm discussing. Demon Regeneration is based upon Demon Blood, that means every Demon has Regeneration but that doesn't automatically mean every Demon is capable of the same regenerative feats, some Demons have blatantly better Regeneration than others do. Some range from Low-Mid all the way to Low-Godly, and obviously not every Demon has Low-Godly regeneration. This is quite literally you taking scans and such out of context and attempting to use said scales for scaling purpose. The issue arises when we have various Demons with mutiple levels of Regeneration, all of which are varied on the Demon in question. Yes all Demons regenerate going by the scans above, but it's never stated nor implied every Demon has the same level of Regeneration.
Watch the fight again, the evidence is directly in your face. Sid fights Dante as Abigail, they clash and Sid is reverted to his base form, Dante then kills him with a shot to the head. And for your information, it's not up to me to prove shit, it's completely up to you to prove that Base weakened Sid has all the same abilities and such as Abigail ( which defeats the purpose of Sid fusing to begin with. ) it's up to you to prove a positive, not my job to prove a negative, so the burden of proof is on you.
I don't agree with it but yeah, tis on his profile along with type 8 immortality iirc.V has low godly? Wut?
Ah m B, the way the profile is makes it sound like it applies to himself.that's from V'S summonings
Oh that's just for his summons actually, it's not even purely because of demon blood. But eh, it's weird stuff and it's extra weird if we accept the core being the soul of demons when demons by nature are supposed to be "evil spirits" (souls).I don't agree with it but yeah, tis on his profile along with type 8 immortality iirc.
it's like giving humans resistance to fear hax for looking at each-other when birds are scared of them). And the fear manip works solely because of the human's "6th sense" of danger, not because of "mind hax gg".
When did i bring this up actually?Dante resistance to matter
It was answer for LordGin who asked about matter resistant feats.Honestly, i won't even bother. That is quite literally the 5th time (could be more) that you brought up the same debunked points. What even my guy? I wasn't expecting much here, but this is just sad.
Also:
When did i bring this up actually?
What’s the argument against the deconstruction and matter manipulation being on the page?
Tanking a particle beam doesn't grant you resistance to matter manipulation, Mundus's beam doesn't deconstruct or damage on any sort of atomic level, it's just a beam made of particles. And nowhere is it stated in that scan that they attack at a Molecular level, they just dissipate their bodies on a Molecular level.
No, no no that's blatant false information based upon the lack / last second research. Not all Particle Beams disrupt targets on a Molecular level. Such a concept would only apply to neutral-particle-beam, and so far we haven't even made those, at least a proper one and those are specifically made like that by for Military Combat purposes.Umm, particle beams, especially weaponized particle beams can disrupt the targets molecular structure. If what Mundus fires is stated to be a particle beam, I don’t see why tanking it wouldn’t count since Dante’s molecular structure doesn’t get screwed over.
You do know that:Umm, particle beams, especially weaponized particle beams can disrupt the targets molecular structure. If what Mundus fires is stated to be a particle beam, I don’t see why tanking it wouldn’t count since Dante’s molecular structure doesn’t get screwed over.