- 3,532
- 3,432
Can you explain exactly what do you mean by "Good art doesn't need to look good"? It seems self-contradictory, since that's the requirement to be good art. To look good.That isn't how the concept of objectivity works. Those are subjective based on a perception of things being diseased. Good art doesn't even have to look good, and bad art can look great.
Either way, if art is "Subjective" then an effortless doodle I made in three minutes should be considered good art. A banana taped to a wall would be considered good art. There would be no point in learning more about how to draw, since art is subjective.
If art is subjective, why people go to school, train for hours just to improve? "Art is subjective" is pseudo-intellectual bull crap. There is objectivity to art and beauty.
But most cave paintings aren't even considered good by the standards of most people. They're art, but they're not considered good art.Cave paintings are good, basically anything can be. Idk about this instance though.
Even then, most people would agree with me that ZUN's art isn't good. It is a guilty pleasure for a reason. He had what, 20 years, longer than I've been alive to dramatically improve on his art, but it's clear he isn't putting effort to improve his art skills. ZUN is probably too busy killing his neurons with alcohol.