Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sora has a lot of optionsHonestly, most of Gojo's match-ups end up being incon due to limitless. I think Sora can get through it, but if he can't than neither fighter in accomplishing shit
Because Zun's art sucksWhy do Touhou thumbnails use Lost Word and fan art a lot instead of using the canonical drawings? For other characters, I see people use canon art rather than fan art.
So much for JJK.Honestly, most of Gojo's match-ups end up being incon due to limitless. I think Sora can get through it, but if he can't than neither fighter in accomplishing shit
1. So bad, yet so stylish so many fanarts evolve from his.Because Zun's art sucks
Yeah, were they not able to afford the guy who made Superman vs Goku 3? I wonder.
I don't like half of that list and it's not a good sign that all the 3D department is pretty much one dude. He's no Torrian.
Pretty sure any of the Plasma weapons in Fallout break matter down on a molecular level.Heard that DB had doubts on whether Courier can get past Mando's Beskar armor. Courier got so much stuff that can hurt Mando despite the armour lmao. Sure, Star Wars in general has superior tech to Fallout but Mando isn't exactly doing untouchable techie stuff with it. He's just a dude in strong armour (not even full body or anything) that shoots a gun and swings a light saber.
Unfortunately, this means that they haven't properly considered or looked up anything about the MU and it isn't in the works. This makes me sad because it's my most wanted MU by some distance.
He's gone
I don't like half of that list and it's not a good sign that all the 3D department is pretty much one dude. He's no Torrian.
Makes one of the best 3D animated fights
Doesn't get rehired
Not having a lot of good omens on season 11 tbhI hate RT
Considering June is being a possible premiere month, I think they're barely getting started.Not having a lot of good omens on season 11 tbh
Did they started on the 3D fights now or awhile
I mean, that's objectively true but still, use canon art. There is plenty of good canon Touhou art made by other artists that aren't ZUN.Because Zun's art sucks
He's gone
I don't like half of that list and it's not a good sign that all the 3D department is pretty much one dude. He's no Torrian.
It can't be that bad.Because Zun's art sucks
It can't be that bad.
Wait, that was it? That's not that bad.
Yeah, it has a charm to it.Wait, that was it? That's not that bad.
Wtf happened to the budget and what's going on behind the scenesConsidering June is being a possible premiere month, I think they're barely getting started.
Last season popped off and they went over budget. And RT is RT lolWtf happened to the budget and what's going on behind the scenes
Art isn't an objective scale, it isn't like numbers.Yeah, it has a charm to it.
But since he hasn't improved dramatically in 20 years of drawing, I'd still say his art sucks. I mean, who draws for 20 years and doesn't improve dramatically? (Inb4 "He improved a little bit so you're opinion is disregarded!")
I disagree. Art is like beauty, it is partially objective. You wouldn't say that my turds can be subjectively beautiful. We all have a disgust towards feces, boogers, garbage, etc. Therefore those things are objectively ugly.Art isn't an objective scale, it isn't like numbers.
I think you answered your own question...They had one of the best 3D animators that produced one of the best 3D episodes in all of Death Battle animate for a season and then they just let him go??? Why??? Contract him again, he is good. Are they broke?
That isn't how the concept of objectivity works. Those are subjective based on a perception of things being diseased. Good art doesn't even have to look good, and bad art can look great.I disagree. Art is like beauty, it is partially objective. You wouldn't say that my turds can be subjectively beautiful. We all have a disgust towards feces, boogers, garbage, etc. Therefore those things are objectively ugly.
Cave paintings are good, basically anything can be. Idk about this instance though.ZUN's art can be criticized objectively in many ways. Lack of good perspective, inconsistency, same face syndrome, bad shading (Especially compared to his older drawings), etc
Yeah, it has a charm to it.
But since he hasn't improved dramatically in 20 years of drawing, I'd still say his art sucks. I mean, who draws for 20 years and doesn't improve dramatically? (Inb4 "He improved a little bit so you're opinion is disregarded!")
Btw, the word you were looking for was "intersubjective."That isn't how the concept of objectivity works.
Can you explain exactly what do you mean by "Good art doesn't need to look good"? It seems self-contradictory, since that's the requirement to be good art. To look good.That isn't how the concept of objectivity works. Those are subjective based on a perception of things being diseased. Good art doesn't even have to look good, and bad art can look great.
But most cave paintings aren't even considered good by the standards of most people. They're art, but they're not considered good art.Cave paintings are good, basically anything can be. Idk about this instance though.
His art actually got worse, his PC-98 era art looked cute and charming, now it just looks kinda bad lolYeah, it has a charm to it.
But since he hasn't improved dramatically in 20 years of drawing, I'd still say his art sucks. I mean, who draws for 20 years and doesn't improve dramatically? (Inb4 "He improved a little bit so you're opinion is disregarded!")
What a diet of drinking alcohol 3 times a day does to a MFHis art actually got worse, his PC-98 era art looked cute and charming, now it just looks kinda bat lol
But ZUN might die without alcohol, its his liver's life source.suggestion and easiest way and most reasonable way to solve this problem: I lock ZUN in a room for 30 days with no alcohol. He will be forced to train his art skills with YouTube videos. I'll only give him crayons and pencils. He will improve in no time.
That's not why people like art. Art is about emotion and symbolism and shit. There's a reason people care WHO made art. Even if it looks the same, the art by the original guy is better than the art of someone who copies that shit.Can you explain exactly what do you mean by "Good art doesn't need to look good"? It seems self-contradictory, since that's the requirement to be good art. To look good.
Art isn't about what "looks nice." A banana taped to a wall could be banger art depending on the wall. If someone tapes like 50 bananas on the wall in a fun pattern, that can be great art.Either way, if art is "Subjective" then an effortless doodle I made in three minutes should be considered good art. A banana taped to a wall would be considered good art. There would be no point in learning more about how to draw, since art is subjective.
Objective by what standard? Who sets that? You're being anti-intellectual here, and forgetting what intersubjectivity is.If art is subjective, why people go to school, train for hours just to improve? "Art is subjective" is pseudo-intellectual bull crap. There is objectivity to art and beauty.
A bunch of people consider Garfield to be good art, I don't trust the majority.But most cave paintings aren't even considered good by the standards of most people. They're art, but they're not considered good art.
I don't care at all about this specific art, I care about this "God hath ordained true art to be as such" mentality.Even then, most people would agree with me that ZUN's art isn't good. It is a guilty pleasure for a reason. He had what, 20 years, longer than I've been alive to dramatically improve on his art, but it's clear he isn't putting effort to improve his art skills. ZUN is probably too busy killing his neurons with alcohol.
I admit that emotion and symbolism can improve art, but it relies on beauty to be good. Anyone can make art with a deep meaning, have it based on emotions and have a lot of symbolism. Someone could make a simple stickman drawing about how their girlfriend left them or something. But if it is ugly, it is bad art. Even if we use emotion and symbolism to measure the quality of art. ZUN isn't good at conveying deep emotions through his drawings.That's not why people like art. Art is about emotion and symbolism and shit. There's a reason people care WHO made art. Even if it looks the same, the art by the original guy is better than the art of someone who copies that shit.
You're wrong. Art is about things that look nice. It is also about many other things but denying that beauty is related to art is wrong. And no, I am not talking about taping multiple bananas to make something else. I am talking about what's considered to be modern art nowadays, taping a single banana to a wall. How is that beautiful? It isn't. It's lazy and ugly, therefore bad art.Art isn't about what "looks nice." A banana taped to a wall could be banger art depending on the wall. If someone tapes like 50 bananas on the wall in a fun pattern, that can be great art.
It's objective by the standard of the majority of people, the group of people it tries to appeal to, by what ZUN's art tries to be and convey, and professional artists. Also, throwing new words you read on the dictionary yesterday doesn't make your case better.Objective by what standard? Who sets that? You're being anti-intellectual here, and forgetting what intersubjectivity is.
Garfield achieves what it tries to do, ZUN doesn't. It is the art style of an artist that spent years trying to improve his art skills. It is good at what it tries to do. Garfield is also not an eyesore.A bunch of people consider Garfield to be good art, I don't trust the majority.
I am not basing my standards of what is objectively good art on God or anything similar. There has to be a level of objectivity to art, or else literally anything can be "Good art"I don't care at all about this specific art, I care about this "God hath ordained true art to be as such" mentality.
No lol, their team is composed of people against AI stuff.So if Season 11 is gonna be on a very limited budget, you think the DB team might use AI?