• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I admit that emotion and symbolism can improve art, but it relies on beauty to be good. Anyone can make art with a deep meaning, have it based on emotions and have a lot of symbolism. Someone could make a simple stickman drawing about how their girlfriend left them or something. But if it is ugly, it is bad art. Even if we use emotion and symbolism to measure the quality of art. ZUN isn't good at conveying deep emotions through his drawings.
Art is about conveying emotion. There's a reason photography is art and a mountain isn't.
You're wrong. Art is about things that look nice. It is also about many other things but denying that beauty is related to art is wrong. And no, I am not talking about taping multiple bananas to make something else. I am talking about what's considered to be modern art nowadays, taping a single banana to a wall. How is that beautiful? It isn't. It's lazy and ugly, therefore bad art.
Wow, haha, modern art bad, what a witty and original take. The banana on a wall is meant to be satire, you're literally meant to go "why is this art?" Some of it is just corposlop a rich dude donates for a tax write off though.
It's objective by the standard of the majority of people, the group of people it tries to appeal to, by what ZUN's art tries to be and convey, and professional artists. Also, throwing new words you read on the dictionary yesterday doesn't make your case better.
It's literally not objective. It's that in the SUBJECTIVE OPINION of a lot of people. I'm not going to engage with your arguments if "big word bad TwT" is one of them.
I am not basing my standards of what is objectively good art on God or anything similar. There has to be a level of objectivity to art, or else literally anything can be "Good art"
Literally anything can be. ART IS A METHOD OF COMMUNICATION. If there was an objective standard that made art good, someone would have made the best piece of art already.
There is a reason why people spend years trying to improve their art skills. You still haven't answered why people spend years trying to improve their art skills if everything is "Subjective".
They develop their art skills so it looks how they want it to, and sometimes, so other people like it more, and think it's better IN THEIR OPINION. I honestly think there is no chance you'll change your mind on this, so there's not really a point in trying to communicate this. I'll leave you with a fun experiment. Change the colors of something and ask like a hundred people if that or the original is better, then do it again. See if there's an "objectively correct" color combo.
 
I was about to reply and continue the argument. But IDK. Maybe I should just agree to disagree and go back to gaming and throwing my controller against the wall.
 
Multiverse as a concept is a nice idea to make crossovers, but by now that horse is zombie at this point.
The way MCU and Mortal Kombat went about them, made people get fed up with the multiverse concept, i think only Invincible does a good job, but its cuz its from a time it wasnt a mainstream idea, hell even 90s spiderman did it but was done good, unlike modern takes on it
 
The way MCU and Mortal Kombat went about them, made people get fed up with the multiverse concept, i think only Invincible does a good job, but its cuz its from a time it wasnt a mainstream idea, hell even 90s spiderman did it but was done good, unlike modern takes on it
Multiverse as a concept is a nice idea to make crossovers, but by now that horse is zombie at this point.
Pretty much
As a concept it's fine but like every other idea it's without proper it gets stale and tiresome
 
The way MCU and Mortal Kombat went about them, made people get fed up with the multiverse concept, i think only Invincible does a good job, but its cuz its from a time it wasnt a mainstream idea, hell even 90s spiderman did it but was done good, unlike modern takes on it
TBH I feel like its mostly MCUs fault. MK and others are aping MCU here.
 

1. A vocal version is pending for this work.
2. It leaves only "Vengeful Voyage" (Chihiro Rokuhira (Kagurabachi) vs Frieren (Frieren: Beyond Journey's End)) as the unreleased video teased in January 2024.

TBH I feel like its mostly MCUs fault. MK and others are aping MCU here.
Should I mention DCEU briefly mentioned the multiverse with intertwined timelines and merging points?
 
This today banner in the server
krillin_vs_omi__by_totallynotincina_dge7yb0-pre.jpg
 
I know this is lame a shit but I really want to stop seeing Peppersalt43 bumps in my alerts so can some vote on this thread for me so I can be free.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top