Uh, actually even less because Zarbon being 3x is a contradiction with the power levels of Saiyan Saga. It's not a rule, it's just a terrible staff decision, and based on all these reasons, an attempt
will be made to get at least SS3's multiplier back up.
In the panels, it’s straight up
not worded that way.
Think about it, it's a matter of interpretation.
The reason why Super Saiyan God is even acknowledged as stronger than SSB Vegeta is because he was at less than 10%. That is the justification as to why he was weaker after all. "Why is Goku showing a better performance in Power than SSB Vegeta? Because Vegeta wasn't even at 10%", this is a direct implication that this superiority would not be as relevant or significant had Vegeta been at 1/10th of his power. If they're roughly comparable, Vegeta would be capable of doing just as well as Goku did against Hit.
In fact, this is even implied by Goku himself
after he forfeits the match.
Yes, that’s what I was saying. It would not be 10x because he was stronger than Less than 10%. (Which is literally any number of SSB’s power that ISN’T 10%. Such as 1%, or 5%, or .003%, or .0000001%, or 9.999999999%).
I'll assume you're not too familiar with math, because you're straight up incorrect in that.
If Vegeta was below 10%, that means the multiplication necessary for his maximum output would be "greater than 10x".
GREATER.
This means, the less percentage Vegeta was,
the higher the multiplier would be. It's
not "LESS than 10x" based on logic, it's HIGHER than 10x. But then you factor in the fact SSG Goku isn't equal to less than 10% Vegeta, he is stronger than that, so Vegeta's percentage is
higher than 10 times the power of his maximum, but Goku is stronger so it's "
less than the supposed multiplier, which
has to be higher than 10x".
For the multiplier to be less than 10x, you'd have to assume SSG Goku is stronger than 10% Vegeta on the dot, as only when you go over 10%, you'd get a lower multiplier. You can't assume that.
Let's dive into wording again,
he
couldn't possibly be below 7%, as the line would not be rounding up to 10%, it would be rounded down to 5%.
To point out my previous comment:
It's not headcanon. That's how statements work.
10 is a round number, so is 5. If they used 10%, then it must be closer to 10% than 5%. If Vegeta was at 2% capacity, stating 10% which would be five times his capacity is nonsensical and pointless. It would be straight up inaccurate.
If the manga is trying to give you data, it's going to use an approximation.
They're not going to use a round number is the actual percentage isn't close to that round number, because literally who does that? The very purpose of a round number is to get an approximation. Otherwise your statement is not giving the reader any relevant or precise information.
I MEAN YEAH???
THE EVENTS STILL HAPPENED IN THE MANGA, NO????? WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH THE MOVIE VERSION OF THE EVENTS BEING CANON???
Also this links to a kitten being sleepy, not the reference in question.
assuming it IS solely about copyright naming, and thus would exclude Jaco, (which as Nullflower stated is Headcanon, as we do not know why it was not included)
You can cope as much as you want.
It's not headcanon, Jaco is
part of another series entirely, which so happens to share the same universe as Dragon Ball.
It's NOT mainline media, thus it's not going to be included in a timeline of the mainline series.
RoF is mainline media, thus if it's not included, it's not canon. Simples as that.
that would still mean that the prequel story
Dragon Ball Minus, which is under the pen name
Dragon Ball, SHOULD and yet it doesn’t exist there.
DBS Broly
already included the events of DB Minus. Why tf would they promote a story that's already told in the movie they're going to show?
DB Minus is NOT it's own manga, it's a bonus story of Jaco the Galactic Patrolman, and thus falls under the same category of being a spin-off. Your own link clarifies so.