- 6,130
- 4,213
Yeah okay....so we are on same page.that's what makes the 3-A structure a low 2-C structure
Yeah but this 2C structure is contained inside a hypertimeline......which there are 12 of, therefore, 12 x low 2-C = 2-C structure
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah okay....so we are on same page.that's what makes the 3-A structure a low 2-C structure
Yeah but this 2C structure is contained inside a hypertimeline......which there are 12 of, therefore, 12 x low 2-C = 2-C structure
I don't wanna be part of this debate just correcting something here there are gonna be timelines with 18 universes as well so dbh time lines will have 12-18 universesthat's what makes the 3-A structure a low 2-C structure
which there are 12 of, therefore, 12 x low 2-C = 2-C structure
Yeah, it would be nice.Is it possible to get a summary of what's currently being debated?
Basically to put it simply if dbh is 1-c or notYeah, it would be nice.
What's being debated is if the timelines are going to be 5D or notIs it possible to get a summary of what's currently being debated?
Basically yeah ...... in a nutshellWhat's being debated is if the timelines are going to be 5D or not
This is....literally the premise of the thread.What's being debated is if the timelines are going to be 5D or not
I too for some reasonFor some reason I feel optimistic that this will get accepted........
What do you mean by "they"?Wait, just realized something.
Even if you get 5-D or 6-D out of this, don’t they have to be proven to be infinitely superior to each other to qualify as an upgrade?
The timeline that would be surrounding the lesser timelines.What do you mean by "they"?
Not in this case as I believe the logic is the same as the difference between a 3-A structure and low 2-C, what you're effectively asking is "prove destroying a timeline is greater than a 3-A structure". This is due to how the 5D hyper-timeline argument is constructed.infinitely superior to each other to qualify as an upgrade?
Ofc you would jump into the bandwagon.Lmfao, I agree
I’m not sure that’s quite the same here, correct me if I’m wrong.Not in this case as I believe the logic is the same as the difference between a 3-A structure and low 2-C, what you're effectively asking is "prove destroying a timeline is greater than a 3-A structure". This is due to how the 5D hyper-timeline argument is constructed.
That was already a givenOfc you would jump into the bandwagon.
5d i thinkWould DBH be 5-D or 6-D?
it's not "surrounding" them, the "hyper-timeline" is built from an uncountably infinite snapshots of a 2-C structure.Because if the timeline that surrounds the lesser timelines
“Surround” was the wrong word for it but you know what I meant by that.it's not "surrounding" them, the "hyper-timeline" is built from an uncountably infinite snapshots of a 2-C structure.
It more or less is the same. We know that destroying a timeline is equivalent to uncountably infinite instances of 3-dimensional universe destruction, right?I’m not sure that’s quite the same here, correct me if I’m wrong.
Because if the timeline that surrounds the lesser timelines becomes 5-D or 6-D somehow, that would be assuming it’s an entire dimension superior to them.
The hypertimeline already treats the 4D universes in it as 4D timeline would treat a 3D object.I’m not sure that’s quite the same here, correct me if I’m wrong.
Because if the timeline that surrounds the lesser timelines becomes 5-D or 6-D somehow, that would be assuming it’s an entire dimension superior to them.
It being 5-D or not in the first place wasn’t what my point was about.The hypertimeline already treats the 4D universes in it as 4D timeline would treat a 3D object.
Hence hypertimeline is 5D
Well, this is destroying an uncountably infinite number of universes, just done in an unconventional way. Which does count according to the tiering system.It’s if the hypertimelines 5-D would be infinitely superior to the 4-D objects inside of itself as that would be the only way you’d get an upgrade out of it.
And I’m unsure if it’s plausible to assume it would be without something proving it, as we normally require for higher-D based feats.
I try to prove such in this post of mine......It being 5-D or not in the first place wasn’t what my point was about.
It’s if the hypertimelines 5-D would be infinitely superior to the 4-D objects inside of itself as that would be the only way you’d get an upgrade out of it.
And I’m unsure if it’s plausible to assume it would be without something proving it, as we normally require for higher-D based feats.
Low 1-C isn't 5-dimensional by default, I thought we cleared this up since like, 2019.but isnt it about a 5d upgrade?