- 8,846
- 9,507
- Thread starter
- #81
We’re at 81 messages already. Guys chill out lmao.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks for explaining it a lot better so because of this I am fully on board with this if this matches the standardI'll point out that the argument isn't about 5-dimensional space at all. Nor does it apply to all multiverses.
There's an uncountably infinite amount of 3-dimensional universes in a timeline (one for each infinitesimal moment) and destroying this is Low 2-C.
Now, a timeline containing 4-dimensional space-time continuums would have an uncountably infinite number of 4-dimensional universes making up itself. So destroying it is Low 1-C.
Note that this only applies if a multiverse is specified to be a timeline in which lesser timelines are bound. Anything else is just a regular Tier 2 structure.
wanna continue the discussion in the general discussion thread ? it's pretty interesting now that i understand what he meansWe’re at 81 messages already. Guys chill out lmao.
Tbf, considering how little content Dragon Ball fans get, it's no wonder this is getting so much attention.We’re at 81 messages already. Guys chill out lmao.
From what I heard there are verses that are low 1-C for this reason.Also, a ton of verses would be Low 1-C because of this.Also, why do I feel like this should be a staff only thread?
Me too, thought I don't remember which onesFrom what I heard there are verses that are low 1-C for this reason.
Here in forums or fandom?Saw something on Ultima message wall that kind of addresses this issue, Anyways let wait for him/her
To clarify: When I talked about this before, I was referring to cosmologies where the entire timeline of a smaller spacetime continuum was superseded, and thus subordinate to, a higher flow of time in a bigger space, much like how the spatial volume of a 4-D universe is subordinate to the full time axis, which holds uncountably infinite "snapshots" of it, each corresponding to a single point in time.
In this case, the best way to prove that would be by showing that the multiverse has its own past and a future that exists separately from the past and future of individual timelines and instead encompasses them, and thus, destroying the multiverse throughout this higher flow of time would be Low 1-C, just like destroying the universe throughout all of time is Low 2-C.
Be careful with that, though, since timelines are ultimately objects that can be mathematically treated like any other, and thus have hypervolume (4-volume, specifically, assuming they are 4-D continuums) that informs their size, too. So, if a spacetime continuum is explicitly finite and contained within a larger one, it's very, very plausible that the latter just has a larger hypervolume than it, but not necessarily infinitely so.
YeahThis is the post Lormac is talking about. On his wall here.
If it’s just some random space that contains them and not a timeline, then it doesn’t qualify.I'm pretty sure xeno goku and demigra put the crack of time at risk when they fought and the crack of time is described as a 6th dimensional space that is outside time too
It contains the timelines as mere 3-D crystals, yesIf it’s just some random space that contains them and not a timeline, then it doesn’t qualify.
It contains the timelines as mere 3-D crystals, yes
Otto they can’t be 3D if they’re timelines.
It works in the same way as DBS, I suppose@Zamasu_Chan
Could you explain to me where all of this about timelines within timelines comes from, in DBH's case? I think I have a pretty good idea of what it's supposed to be, but I'd like to confirm it first.
It’s the exact same as DBS. There are 12-18 universes within a timeline made by a time ring.@Zamasu_Chan
Could you explain to me where all of this about timelines within timelines comes from, in DBH's case? I think I have a pretty good idea of what it's supposed to be, but I'd like to confirm it first.
Sorry if I'm bringing back an old debate, but that does sound pretty strange, given how I could've sworn that we all agreed to not treat the individual universes as separate spacetimes anymore in the thread you've made regarding the standards for Low 2-C. Mostly because of how Zeno destroying Trunks' world (And killing Zamasu along with it) clearly didn't destroy past, present and future, seeing as how Whis still could go back in time to a period where it wasn't erased yet, which in itself just sounds like more evidence that they are not spacetimes on their own rather than evidence that the Dragon Ball Multiverse has a second temporal dimension.It’s the exact same as DBS. There are 12-18 universes within a timeline made by a time ring.
Then why was it rejected?Sorry if I'm bringing back an old debate, but that does sound pretty strange, given how I could've sworn that we all agreed to not treat the individual universes as separate spacetimes anymore in the thread you've made regarding the standards for Low 2-C.
This, well I’ll talk about this later.Mostly because of how Zeno destroying Trunks' world (And killing Zamasu along with it) clearly didn't destroy past, present and future,
This is actually not true at all. Whis went to a completely different timeline. He even said that there would be 2 Mais and 2 Trunks.seeing as how Whis still could go back in time to a period where it wasn't erased yet,
Second temporal dimension?which in itself just sounds like more evidence that they are not spacetimes on their own rather than evidence that the Dragon Ball Multiverse has a second temporal dimension.
It was not rejected, as far as I am aware, unless you care to point me to any particular post in the thread that indicates this. From what I remember, it was just postponed, since big revisions that would affect multiple verses were still banned during the early days of the New Forum.Then why was it rejected?
We had a thread about DBS and we rejected it again. Medeus and AKM made this clearIt was not rejected, as far as I am aware, unless you care to point me to any particular post in the thread that indicates this. From what I remember, it was just postponed, since big revisions that would affect multiple verses were still banned during the early days of the New Forum.
Nevermind that it wasn't even a CRT, per se, just a call for action, because it just so happened that people didn't understand what exactly Low 2-C entailed, and slapped it on characters that actually didn't qualify at all.
I think Ultima meant the revisions for the tier 2 standards in general, not specifically DBBut it was rejected. Yesterday. By AKM and DDM.
DDM's only arguments against it were things like "Zamasu was appearing in the main timeline, so he must have been merging with spacetime too" (Which still doesn't mean that Universe 7 itself is a spacetime continuum, just that Zamasu's influence was affecting spacetime and thus seeping into other timelines), or "Toriyama explicitly mentions that there are space-time barriers between the 12 universes" (Which I'd like to see scans for), meanwhile AKM didn't even make an argument against it to begin with, as far as I've seen, and just said "Stop overthinking, DB's cosmology is 2-C, and that's all there is to it."But it was rejected. Yesterday. By AKM and DDM.
same lolWhy do I feel this is going to end with a downgrade rather than an upgrade
I also somewhat agree with this. The refutes for the anti tier 2 side were not really good ones. That doesn’t make the pro 3-A side any better though.DDM's only arguments against it were things like "Zamasu was appearing in the main timeline, so he must have been merging with spacetime too" (Which still doesn't mean that Universe 7 itself is a spacetime continuum, just that Zamasu's influence was affecting spacetime and thus seeping into other timelines), or "Toriyama explicitly mentions that there are space-time barriers between the 12 universes" (Which I'd like to see scans for), meanwhile AKM didn't even make an argument against it to begin with, as far as I've seen, and just said "Stop overthinking, DB's cosmology is 2-C, and that's all there is to it).
The former could potentially be something, and the latter doesn't hold up at all. So, yeah, I'm bringing up that subject again.