Vietthai96
He/Him- 10,169
- 14,464
Peoples: post gifs
Me: Can't see the gifs
What the hell they doing
Me: Can't see the gifs
What the hell they doing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Battling beyond time and space( shit posting)Peoples: post gifs
Me: Can't see the gifs
What the hell they doing
You have 12 in the name, dragon ball has 12 universes in a timeline.
Only Arale's profile so far, the rest will be discussed later.What changes can be applied immediately after this thread? Im pretty sure we need a CRT for each change
DT actually said that it could extend along the same axis in its independent temporal dimensions. Even time flowing is different does not mean different/extra-axesWe're waiting on the revised draft from DT, but even if the different time streams within the timeline don't qualify, there is a possibility the timelines due to being independent Temporal Constructs would be Low 1-C.
If a Timeline is accepted as Low 1-C any character currently scaling to destroying one or all Timelines would be Low 1-CWhat changes can be applied immediately after this thread?
That would require it's own thread, but the basis this thread is based of is "multiple temporal dimensions based of time that flows in the same direction" which is getting overturned.We're waiting on the revised draft from DT, but even if the different time streams within the timeline don't qualify, there is a possibility the timelines due to being independent Temporal Constructs would be Low 1-C.
So basicallyIf a Timeline is accepted as Low 1-C = Any character currently scaling to destroying one or all Timelines would be Low 1-C
If the greater zone containing all Timelines is considered Low 1-C, then characters who can effect all Timelines would be Low 1-C.
Arale!!!!So basically
Zeno
All 2-A profiles
The gp would also be low-1c, due to scaling from zeno's eeAfaik the consensus was:
Zeno becomes Low 1-C for being able to destroy the cosmology.
DBH and DBX needs their own thread to apply this to stats.
Afaik the consensus was:
Zeno becomes Low 1-C for being able to destroy the cosmology.
DBH and DBX needs their own thread to apply this to stats (as it was stated verbatim within the course of the thread).
Yes, there may be different, inclusive or independent temporal dimensions, but as long as they do not flow in different directions and axes, nothing changes, and this was the basis of the thread I openedThat would require it's own thread, but the basis this thread is based of is "multiple temporal dimensions based of time that flows in the same direction" which is getting overturned.
it isn't needed, pretty unnecessary,DBH and DBX needs their own thread to apply this to stats (as it was stated verbatim within the course of the thread).
oh, mind to enlighten me on what different time direction look like???Yes, there may be different, inclusive or independent temporal dimensions, but as long as they do not flow in different directions and axes, nothing changes, and this was the basis of the thread I opened
Uh I don’t think they need their own threads. Just like Qawsef said, any 2-As become directly changed by the result, since they all scale to the destruction of all timelines.Afaik the consensus was:
Zeno becomes Low 1-C for being able to destroy the cosmology.
DBH and DBX needs their own thread to apply this to stats.
I get that but we cant just go back on our word at the 11th hour because it's "unnecessary". That's bad faith.it isn't needed, pretty unnecessary,
should ice write one like last time, or should i write one? tbh im mainly a fate/tsukihime and umineko scaler, but neither of those are active as of nowWe seriously need a cosmology page to be made for this.
Well, if the majority agree with that then I'm cool with it since I don't really care. But haven't people been saying to make a separate thread throughout this one?Uh I don’t think they need their own threads. Just like Qawsef said, any 2-As become directly changed by the result, since they all scale to the destruction of all timelines.
You can do itshould ice write one like last time, or should i write one? tbh im mainly a fate/tsukihime and umineko scaler, but neither of those are active as of now
Basically they can't flow forwards or backwards in any capacity. They have to move sideways or have something like time existing in one sectionbefore time existed in another and/or have time continue to exist in one section while time is removed from another.oh, mind to enlighten me on what different time direction look like???
nah we got 2 minutes leftAlright boys I think grace is over we can proceed
It's not over, because the standard this is predicated on is being changed. That must go through first.Alright boys I think grace is over we can proceed
So we're waiting for the staff thread to conclude first?It's not over, because the standard this is predicated on is being changed. That must go through first.
Thank you very much for explaining it to usBasically they can't flow forwards or backwards in any capacity. They have to move sideways or have something like time existing in one sectionbefore time existed in another and/or have time continue to exist in one section while time is removed from another.
Alternatively for time traveling, if you do time travel, if the new timeline you land on is completely independent it would also suggest more temporal axis being present.
Or in other words:
The DB Multiverse is probably not Low 1-C under the standards. The Timestreams as a collective are probably Low 1-C since when you time travel you're going to an independent temporal existence rather than a branched Multiverse. At least that is my current haphazard understanding of it.
- You have to have a timeline R>F another Timeline. Something that gets you Low 1-C anyways.
- You have to showcase time not moving forwards or backwards but in an orthogonal direction (which I cannot imagine any non-Suggsverse series doing)
- You have to showcase an independent existence of time seperate from another's existence in a particular way
Yes. Since the Staff thrrad determines if each Timeline is Low 1-C (this thread) or if the collective of all Timelines are Low 1-C (another thread)So we're waiting for the staff thread to conclude first?
The temporal dimension is basically modeled as a 1-dimensional line, I'll give you a simple exampleit isn't needed, pretty unnecessary,
oh, mind to enlighten me on what different time direction look like???
Page 10. Only in DB threads. Is there anything else left to be discussed?
That's it, that's the end of it and now we just have to wait for the team thread to close, for DT to make his draft.Page 10. Only in DB threads. Is there anything else left to be discussed?
COOK@Georredannea15 @PrinceofPein Will either of you two actually give examples of characters that would qualify for your version of hypertimelines? The fact you’ve not remotely given examples for this backwards ass logic makes it really hard for anyone to see your side of the argument to be reasonable. Especially if you’re gonna argue Dragon Ball doesn’t qualify for this.
Do I have to give an example for something? Because they wanted it in the thread they wanted, but DT didn't pay much attention to it and basically supported what I wrote (even questioning the old standards were like this and why they changed)@Georredannea15 @PrinceofPein Will either of you two actually give examples of characters that would qualify for your version of hypertimelines? The fact you’ve not remotely given examples for this backwards ass logic makes it really hard for anyone to see your side of the argument to be reasonable. Especially if you’re gonna argue Dragon Ball doesn’t qualify for this.
Does that mean time has to stay stagnant? because time by definition has no direction, thats a spatial concept, and even them, time is represented by a straight line, forwards for the future, and backwards for the past. Does time have to go ina loop-de-loop or diagonal?
- You have to showcase time not moving forwards or backwards
Do I have to give an example for something short answer yes, long answer is yes absolutely without an exception.Do I have to give an example for something? Because they wanted it in the thread they wanted, but DT didn't pay much attention to it and basically supported what I wrote (even questioning the old standards were like this and why they changed)
In short, these were things that used to happen, just not in a very detailed way