• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

(DB Tier 1) We must imagine a DB scaler happy.

Status
Not open for further replies.
so uh
whats gonna happen after grace
do we wait for georr's thread to finish or are the changes gonna be applied
 
It is though at least everyone agrees with DT which is the previous standard.
And the outcome of this thread hinges on that thread.
No it won’t DT practically gave an example that was the same as DB.

A timeline encompassing other space-timez (timelines) has never been considered an extra temporal dimension. It's always been and will be a timeline that encompasses other space-times (timelines) with their own temporal dimensions
 
so uh
whats gonna happen after grace
do we wait for georr's thread to finish or are the changes gonna be applied
Zeno and many profiles needs to be unlocked after grace.

Uh anyway, Standards are still same and unchanged, also among all the examples given by DT for when time axis of multiverse qualifies for Low 1-C, DB follows one. So it's fine regardless.
 
so uh
whats gonna happen after grace
do we wait for georr's thread to finish or are the changes gonna be applied
Wait for Geor thread since the standard this thread is based on, is getting changed in their thread.
No it won’t DT practically gave an example that was the same as DB.

A timeline encompassing other space-timez (timelines) has never been considered an extra temporal dimension. It's always been and will be a timeline that encompasses other space-times (timelines) with their own temporal dimensions
Not the basis of this thread and another argument entirely, create a new thread for that and then we can talk about that there. So far as this is based on the current argument it does not pass if the standard gets overturned.
Also I am not sure you read what you wrote but it is incoherent though I understand the underlying message and probably a typo on your end.
 
No offense, but can you please stop posting? Go to the general discussion or something like that, this is unnecessarily filling this crt.
It seems like no one listens anymore.

No offense, but if you want to ask about the grace period, just go to the general discussion.

There's no reason to ask here and clog up the crt with questions like this or "who scale to whom"

This will be seen later.
 
If you then can proof that those aren't discrete alternate version (i.e. not like in fiction where every time travel just spawns a new timeline), but a continuous time-like progression of the timeline, that should work.
Just quote what DT say, as long as that "hypertimeline" is not discreate version or just a parallel timeline but a continuous time progress, that is low 1C
 
40 min till grace
super-buu-hourglass.gif
 
Btw it looks like the standards are going to change and DT will be the one who drafts it, but if you guys don't want to wait any longer, just do it, it will be revisited after standards has already changed.

But personally, I'd rather wait and see what happens
 
So if you guys can come in and say your mind, that will be great.
We're waiting on the revised draft from DT, but even if the different time streams within the timeline don't qualify, there is a possibility the timelines due to being independent Temporal Constructs would be Low 1-C.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top