• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Composite Black Clover Vs Composite Seven Deadly Sins

Y'all wanna prove that anti-magic in itself isn't a form of magic because the natural assumption is that it would be magic since its an esoteric ability within a world which other esoteric abilities exist, with most of those abilities being formed by magic, this includes even Devils within the series, with them using basically a corrupted form of magic. (negative mana)
 
Y'all wanna prove that anti-magic in itself isn't a form of magic because the natural assumption is that it would be magic since its an esoteric ability within a world which other esoteric abilities exist, with most of those abilities being formed by magic, this includes even Devils within the series, with them using basically a corrupted form of magic. (negative mana)
Anti Magic isn't magic. That's been stated numerous of times in the series, and why his power is so broken lol. The "history" behind anti-magic hasnt been fully explained so it's not something we can "prove". But the series has made it very clear since he got his grimoire
 
Anti Magic isn't magic. That's been stated numerous of times in the series, and why his power is so broken lol. The "history" behind anti-magic hasnt been fully explained so it's not something we can "prove". But the series has made it very clear since he got his grimoire
Provide those statements.

The "history" doesn't matter since i'm making an Occam's Razor argument based on the current information that we have.
 
Immortality (Type 1, 3, 5 and 6: Transcend Life and Death, has a different type of immortality from Ban who regenerates. Chaos can possess others such as Arthur), Incorporeality and Abstract Existence (Type 1; Chaos is a Will and has no physical form)

It ain't easy 😭

Edit: AE removed.
 
I would just make the argument that Anti-Magic is something that can't really be sensed given its inherent power nullification properties negging the mana sense of other mages.

Hence why the dude couldn't sense Asta's anti-magic within him.
 
I would just make the argument that Anti-Magic is something that can't really be sensed given its inherent power nullification properties negging the mana sense of other mages.

Hence why the dude couldn't sense Asta's anti-magic within him.
That doesnt debunk anti magic not being magic
 
I would just make the argument that Anti-Magic is something that can't really be sensed given its inherent power nullification properties negging the mana sense of other mages.

Hence why the dude couldn't sense Asta's anti-magic within him.
He didn't have Anti Magic when he was sensed. He didn't get his grimoire until after.
 
That doesnt debunk anti magic not being magic
That statement doesn't debunk my previous argument either given this context.

He didn't have Anti Magic in him when it was sensed. He didn't get his grimoire until after.
So Asta didn't even have his magic yet, how can you even use this scan to prove your argument when Asta didn't even have his anti-magic yet?
 
The only reason why he can even use Anti Magic is because he has 0 magic.
Anti magic is explicitly stated to be different from magic, in fact the only reason Asta can use it is because he has 0 magic.

IMG_5097.jpg
 
That statement doesn't debunk my previous argument either given this context.


So Asta didn't even have his magic yet, how can you even use this scan to prove your argument when Asta didn't even have his anti-magic yet?
Asta can’t sense magic either

you need magic to sense magic and with anti magic Asta can’t sense magic.
 
Anti magic is inherently not magic, it’s analogous to anti matter vs matter, Asta is consistently referred to as “magicless loser” all throughout the series (BC goons can slide for me with scans). Also, does Ruler resist PN on Asta’s level (whatever that may be for Asta)?
 
Because Asta had 0 magic power, he was able to use anti magic. Constantly in the manga he's stated to have 0 magic/0 magic power. This isn't rocket science
He had no magical power when he didn't have his anti-magic, duh.

You haven't prove the "constantly" point at all so idk why you're acting like you did.

Until you can fulfill that burden you can't make such a concrete assertion.
 
anyway ill just unfollow this thread

this is just gonna become a clusterfuck soon and i dont want any part of it 🚪
 
Why?

Is there a revision im not privy to?

Either way this is F&G so calm down
Continental/FTL with many New abilities

Also it’s like the 3rd Time this week we have to debate either for or against stomps we asked to stop making these for a few weeks
(If it’s F and G fine)
 
Back
Top