- 6,436
- 1,664
question... How can time be 1D?????
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is my point, @Andy, time destruction is usally associated with timeline or worst is a space-time hax. For 1-D time destruction feat, I visited and edited of thousands of profiles but I never saw it at all.Andytrenom said:@Eli That's cause destroying time rarely means destroying a single dimensional axis, which doesn't even make sense without math or concept bases powers. It usually just refers to destroying the timeline.
Currently on High 3-A Tiering System section:Agnaa said:@Elizhaa @Andy I'm not familiar with the character, but Wokistan said that Saint-14 destroyed time and had this treated as a hax ability, presumably because it was just a 1-D feat.
This is for characters who can destroy and/or create the entire 4-dimensional space-time of a single universe, not just the physical matter within one. For example, an entire timeline. |
This is for characters who are four-dimensional, and/or can destroy and/or create the entire 4-dimensional space-time of a single universe, not just the physical matter within one. For example, an entire timeline. |
Time itself is indeed 1-D yesAgnaa said:Agreed, but even if it was considered as AP it would only be 1-D (in my opinion from what little I've heard).
SCP-4444 is 4-D, I think.Agnaa said:Even if no fiction currently on the site would have a 4-D character under that definitio
I think someone was going to bring up issues with using SCP's statements of dimensionality after Ultima's revisions, but SCP-4444 might get around that if it's shown to have a large degree of control over reality.Dargoo Faust said:SCP-4444 is 4-D, I think.
Andytrenom said:Sorry for saying this so late into the revision but, is there an actual reason for 3-A and high 3-A to be the same tier?
We differentiate between an infinite and finite scale for other tiers (2-B and 2-A, 1-B and high 1-B) so am I missing some important reasoning behind this change? If so, sorry but if not, I don't think we should take up such a big task of editing for an unnecessary change.
I hope that I'd sufficiently explained why "4-D structures less than universal" makes sense and is necessary in the tiering system.DarkDragonMedeus said:Yeah, I'm not sure if merging those tiers are good ideas either. The only part that was agreed was to get rid of the "4-D structures less than universal" since that makes no sense at all. But I think Infinite sized universes and Finite sized universes might still have distinctions. This includes various ancient mythologies that have literally infinite sized flat oceans for example.
Yes there is, the High 3-A tiering for character with a Limited 4-D feat will be removedAntvasima said:Hmm. It seems like we may not perform any changes after all then.