So um, I've read this thread, it took alot of time but okay.
Still I'm not getting sth, are damage and AKM arguing that Aizen's EE is related to his Reiatsu while Arcker and others say it's not?
(Don't get angry if I misunderstood ur position, just correct me for it)
It's related to Reiatsu in the sense that its done by his Reiatsu, as the scan AKM showed for Aizen when he was in Muken.
However, its not related to Reiatsu in the sense of "anyone who reaches this level of Reiatsu will have EE" as this meaning is contradicted by the series, and its not how we treat hax, I agree with Arcker that the burden of proof is on the other side to prove that this weakness exists.
Also I think Aizen's EE has nothing to do with his RC range/Aura, when Reio's remnants came down to SS,
Aizen reiatsu crushed them on a wider range, this is his Reiatsu crush.
But his EE had a much more limited range that it only erased the other soul reapers when they came too close to him in Muken.
Another difference is that his EE is passively surrounding him on a specific range, and anything comes in will get erased as he himself said that to Shunsui, he can control his RC and choose on whom he should use/apply it, which was shown many times in the series.
So based on this I say that his RC aura is irrelevant to his EE hax range, both are completely different things as its shown, its not like when u get strong enough ur Reiatsu crush turns into an EE, both are different things.
That's my opinion for now, and thus I support a full rating of EE.
However if Damage and others didn't agree, I think a compromise of possibly EE should work too.
Sorry if that's too long to read but yeah.
Small addition:
As a Shinigami ability, it has to follow the same rules, if someone is much stronger than u, he will neg it with his Reiatsu.
If someone is comparable to you or weaker, he can't do that with his Reiatsu, and this has many examples over the series, but I think it's everyone agrees on it here so no need for derailment