- 15,438
- 15,404
Beam of Light and it being straight is good enough for light speed IMO
The dancing around that here is a bit ridiculous
The dancing around that here is a bit ridiculous
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like seriously Damage, you can’t tell me his discussion rule making is in the wrong when others have brought up that it took like 5 threads of the same thing when people have made a seireitei downgrade thread and it took that many times finally make a discussion rule about it. One that doesn’t really matter because as soon as the anime comes out you’re going to make another. I’m just skeptical when it comes to staff members commenting on Bleach because I know they’re not in favor of it
And it being reflecting also like light.Beam of Light and it being straight is good enough for light speed IMO
The dancing around that here is a bit ridiculous
It was also reflected/deflected, we are shown + toldBeam of Light and it being straight is good enough for light speed IMO
The dancing around that here is a bit ridiculous
?? The technique does not have multipliersWould this technique be subjected to multiplier stacking if accepted?
While I won’t condone any slander against Staff. I ask that AKM stop intentionally provoking the supporters as well by saying stuff like “this will never get accepted”. It’s obvious that it provoked people the first time he said it, and it clearly provoked people the second time.This is uncalled for. Disagreeing with a staff member's judgement does not mean belittling them.
As per the OPs request, who scales and how scaling is affected is going to be saved for an application thread, this is just to get the calc accepted.He means do people that scale to it get stacked multipliers on it
I wanted to say something about this also but just decided to ignore it.“this will never get accepted”.
Regarding damage’s “it being reflected is vague” point.
Turning aside = cause someone or something to deviate in the direction; direct, avert or deflect someone or something on another course; veer or move away; change position.
Source: theidioms.com
Visual confirmation + auditory confirmation that Renji's Zabimaru deflected Mask's Star Flash = satisfies reflection requirement
Star Flash is a beam of light = satisfies made of light requirement
Two requirements satisfied = light speed laser
I’ll reiterate: Yhwach has detailed daten on the Quincy techniques that he hands out to his very own Quincy, additionally Mask has had 100s if not 1000s of years to familiarize himself with his own techniques. There’s little reason to doubt him.
For the sake of verification, do you have the scans on the Quincy having this daten on their own specific techniques?Fair that doesn’t address the fact Yhwach gives out databooks to his army.
Yes I’ll drop it when I get on my computer.For the sake of verification, do you have the scans on the Quincy having this daten on their own specific techniques?
Wasn't the thread you created for statements like “beam of light” to be accepted as the 4th requirement if it's without contradiction?We were previously fine with using the feat, but then LS standards changed, but now they changed again back to what they were when we accepted Mask/Renji's feat.
Precisely -_-Wasn't the thread you created for statements like “beam of light” to be accepted as the 4th requirement if it's without contradiction?
It was yes and AKM Sama himself said beam of light is fine in that threadWasn't the thread you created for statements like “beam of light” to be accepted as the 4th requirement if it's without contradiction?
"Flowery LaNguage"It seems we may have to wait for a databook to release and the technique glossary in the back to call it a "beam of light" lmao.
……. I will.The whole "wait for the anime" or "wait for more info" is just a weak attempt at buying time and avoid dealing with the issue now.
Like, lets be real, how many if any of us are going to be here in 3 or so years when the anime actually reaches that point, let alone when a possible databook drops which basically has a zero % chance of happening.
I myself have been spending less time on this wikiThe whole "wait for the anime" or "wait for more info" is just a weak attempt at buying time and avoid dealing with the issue now.
Like, lets be real, how many if any of us are going to be here in 3 or so years when the anime actually reaches that point, let alone when a possible databook drops which basically has a zero % chance of happening.
The whole "wait for the anime" or "wait for more info" is just a weak attempt at buying time and avoid dealing with the issue now.
Like, lets be real, how many if any of us are going to be here in 3 or so years when the anime actually reaches that point, let alone when a possible databook drops which basically has a zero % chance of happening.
Objectively false tho, considering the last LS thread got "beam of light" as a satisfactory statement to the fourth requirement barring no contradictions.Don't think that will do anything? If I'm understanding correctly either they believe it still needs to say photons for whatever reason or that somehow mask statement is flowery.
The moment this technique is defined as a beam of light in a legitimate databook will be the moment when Mask's statement would be confirmed to be a reliable matter-of-fact thing and I will vouch for it myself. Take my word for it, if you can believe that.It seems we may have to wait for a databook to release and the technique glossary in the back to call it a "beam of light" lmao.
Any elaboration?I don't think this'd qualify for light speed
Mostly what Damage is saying. The "statement" is questionable, although I'm sure the reflection part is fine.Any elaboration?
Is stated to be a beam of light which thanks to the thread posted here it qualifies for the 4th requirement of it being light
It's also reflected/deflected which is shown + stated