- 15,329
- 14,964
Beam of Light and it being straight is good enough for light speed IMO
The dancing around that here is a bit ridiculous
The dancing around that here is a bit ridiculous
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Bleach: Renji and Mask
- Thread starter Cyberblader90
- Start date
- Status
- 29,724
- 24,670
I haven't seen anything about a discussion rule yet. I might have just missed it though.
- 3,759
- 1,621
And it being reflecting also like light.
- 6,105
- 2,510
It was also reflected/deflected, we are shown + told
So 2 requirements +backing feats like traveling straight and burning/vaporizes
- 6,105
- 2,510
?? The technique does not have multipliers
- 21,105
- 30,051
He means do people that scale to it get stacked multipliers on it
- 16,993
- 22,812
While I won’t condone any slander against Staff. I ask that AKM stop intentionally provoking the supporters as well by saying stuff like “this will never get accepted”. It’s obvious that it provoked people the first time he said it, and it clearly provoked people the second time.
Again I don’t condone anyone lashing back out, but it’s a two way street and I’d appreciate it if we ALL can be civil.
Thank you.
As per the OPs request, who scales and how scaling is affected is going to be saved for an application thread, this is just to get the calc accepted.
Also I’ll respond to damage’s two points in a bit.
- 3,759
- 1,621
I wanted to say something about this also but just decided to ignore it.
- 16,993
- 22,812
Regarding damage’s “it being reflected is vague” point.
Turning aside = cause someone or something to deviate in the direction; direct, avert or deflect someone or something on another course; veer or move away; change position.
Source: theidioms.com
Visual confirmation + auditory confirmation that Renji's Zabimaru deflected Mask's Star Flash = satisfies reflection requirement
Star Flash is a beam of light = satisfies made of light requirement
Two requirements satisfied = light speed laser
The little bit of burning would be entirely to the beam being so energetic and hot that the limited flux into the blade heated it up that much. And as you say, Renji’s blade isn’t pure white, it isn’t a perfect reflector.
Regarding Mask not being a reliable source.
I’ll reiterate: Yhwach has detailed daten on the Quincy techniques that he hands out to his very own Quincy, additionally Mask has had 100s if not 1000s of years to familiarize himself with his own techniques. There’s little reason to doubt him.
- 29,724
- 24,670
I get your point as just "Mask should have time to be aware of his own techniques" but I don't think we have any kind of confirmation that Mask has been alive for hundreds of years.
We saw As Nodt in a modern-day hospital before he was picked up by Yhwach and recruited into the Sternritter. So there's no reason to assume that all of the Sternritter have been around since the beginning of the Wandenreich / end of the previous Quincy war.
- 29,724
- 24,670
For the sake of verification, do you have the scans on the Quincy having this daten on their own specific techniques?
- 16,993
- 22,812
Yes I’ll drop it when I get on my computer.
- 707
- 247
If this doesn’t get accepted something is wrong
- 11,062
- 13,759
I've talked to a few other staff members about this feat, and they agree that "beam of light" in this context does not meet our standards. It really isn't about subjective interpretation. It's a pretty objective thing. The standards are there for everyone to see, and so is the statement. It either meets it, or doesn't. If you think it does, then perhaps you didn't understand the requirements in the first place. I am currently awaiting the input from other staff members.
- 29,724
- 24,670
I would also like to see the input from these staff members.
- 11,062
- 13,759
I have sent messages to @DontTalkDT @Mr._Bambu and @Wokistan about it. Giving them another notification should probably not hurt.
- 8,136
- 2,155
Wasn't the thread you created for statements like “beam of light” to be accepted as the 4th requirement if it's without contradiction?
- 16,993
- 22,812
Precisely -_-
- 5,220
- 3,346
It was yes and AKM Sama himself said beam of light is fine in that thread
The argument isn't so much that "beam of light" is invalid, rather the argument is that the way Mask said it and the context makes it invalid, which is wrong, but at that point you're just arguing against AKM Sama's faulty interpretation.
- 6,105
- 2,510
Mask (the hero) will use his beam of light to kill renji (the villain)
That's all that sentence means, idk what he reading that gives him another interpretation
That's all that sentence means, idk what he reading that gives him another interpretation
- 6,105
- 2,510
"Flowery LaNguage"
- 5,220
- 3,346
The whole "wait for the anime" or "wait for more info" is just a weak attempt at buying time and avoid dealing with the issue now.
Like, lets be real, how many if any of us are going to be here in 3 or so years when the anime actually reaches that point, let alone when a possible databook drops which basically has a zero % chance of happening.
Like, lets be real, how many if any of us are going to be here in 3 or so years when the anime actually reaches that point, let alone when a possible databook drops which basically has a zero % chance of happening.
- 13,510
- 5,665
……. I will.
- 6,105
- 2,510
I myself have been spending less time on this wiki
- 8,136
- 2,155
Don't think that will do anything? If I'm understanding correctly either they believe it still needs to say photons for whatever reason or that somehow mask statement is flowery.
- 16,993
- 22,812
- 16,993
- 22,812
Objectively false tho, considering the last LS thread got "beam of light" as a satisfactory statement to the fourth requirement barring no contradictions.
- 8,136
- 2,155
Well it looks like they don't agree with the thread after all 
.
.
- 3,708
- 1,759
Is this the time Bleahc changes the standards for light speed!?
Follow more on the next episode-
But seriously "beam of light" : it doesn't bend, it reflects, it burns, it doesn't explode. It travels in a straight line
Seems light speed to me, unless "beam of light" means beam of pee-
Follow more on the next episode-
But seriously "beam of light" : it doesn't bend, it reflects, it burns, it doesn't explode. It travels in a straight line
Seems light speed to me, unless "beam of light" means beam of pee-
- 11,062
- 13,759
The moment this technique is defined as a beam of light in a legitimate databook will be the moment when Mask's statement would be confirmed to be a reliable matter-of-fact thing and I will vouch for it myself. Take my word for it, if you can believe that.
- 6,105
- 2,510
If it happens next thing will be "well I changed my mind"
- 15,587
- 11,870
I don't think this'd qualify for light speed
- 6,105
- 2,510
Any elaboration?
Is stated to be a beam of light which thanks to the thread posted here it qualifies for the 4th requirement of it being light
It's also reflected/deflected which is shown + stated
Last edited:
- 15,587
- 11,870
Mostly what Damage is saying. The "statement" is questionable, although I'm sure the reflection part is fine.
- Status
Similar threads
